Improved subsalt images with least-squares reverse time migration

被引:11
|
作者
Wang, Ping [1 ]
Huang, Shouting [1 ]
Wang, Ming [1 ]
机构
[1] CGG, Houston, TX 77072 USA
关键词
DECONVOLUTION;
D O I
10.1190/INT-2016-0203.1
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Complex overburdens often distort reservoir images in terms of structural positioning, stratigraphic resolution, and amplitude fidelity. One prime example of a complex overburden is in the deepwater Gulf of Mexico, where thick and irregular layers of remobilized (i.e., allochthonous) salt are situated above prospective reservoir intervals. The highly variant salt layers create large lateral velocity variations that distort wave propagation and the illumination of deeper reservoir targets. In subsalt imaging, tools such as reflection tomography, fullwaveform inversion, and detailed salt interpretation are needed to derive a high-resolution velocity model that captures the lateral velocity variations. Once a velocity field is obtained, reverse time migration (RTM) can be applied to restore structural positioning of events below and around the salt. However, RTM by nature is unable to fully recover the reflectivity for desired amplitudes and resolution. This shortcoming is well-recognized by the imaging community, and it has propelled the emergence of least-squares RTM (LSRTM) in recent years. We have investigated how current LSRTM methods perform on subsalt images. First, we compared the formulation of data-domain versus image-domain least-squares migration, as well as methods using single-iteration approximation versus iterative inversion. Then, we examined the resulting subsalt images of several LSRTM methods applied on the synthetic and field data. Among our tests, we found that image-domain single-iteration LSRTM methods, including an extension of an approximate inverse Hessian method in the curvelet domain, not only compensated for amplitude loss due to poor illumination caused by complex salt bodies, but it also produced subsalt images with fewer migration artifacts in the field data. In contrast, an iterative inversion method showed its potential for broadening the bandwidth in the subsalt, but it was less effective in reducing migration artifacts and noise. Based on our understanding, we evaluated the current state of LSRTM for subsalt imaging.
引用
收藏
页码:SN25 / SN32
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A guide to least-squares reverse time migration for subsalt imaging: Challenges and solutions
    Zeng, Chong
    Dong, Shuqian
    Wang, Bin
    [J]. INTERPRETATION-A JOURNAL OF SUBSURFACE CHARACTERIZATION, 2017, 5 (03): : SN1 - SN11
  • [2] Elastic least-squares reverse time migration
    Feng, Zongcai
    Schuster, Gerard T.
    [J]. GEOPHYSICS, 2017, 82 (02) : S143 - S157
  • [3] Elastic least-squares reverse time migration
    Duan, Yuting
    Guitton, Antoine
    Sava, Paul
    [J]. GEOPHYSICS, 2017, 82 (04) : S315 - S325
  • [4] Preconditioned least-squares reverse time migration
    [J]. Huang, Jianping (jphuang@mail.ustc.edu.cn), 2016, Science Press (51):
  • [5] Least-squares reverse time migration of multiples
    Zhang, Dongliang
    Schuster, Gerard T.
    [J]. GEOPHYSICS, 2014, 79 (01) : S11 - S21
  • [6] Prestack correlative least-squares reverse time migration
    Liu, Xuejian
    Liu, Yike
    Lu, Huiyi
    Hu, Hao
    Khan, Majid
    [J]. GEOPHYSICS, 2017, 82 (02) : S159 - S172
  • [7] Staining algorithm for least-squares reverse time migration
    Liu, Chang
    Qu, Yingming
    Li, Zhenchun
    Zeng, Shenghan
    Yang, Tingyu
    Zhao, Weijie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2023, 219
  • [8] Least-squares reverse time migration in elastic media
    Ren, Zhiming
    Liu, Yang
    Sen, Mrinal K.
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 208 (02) : 1103 - 1125
  • [9] Full wavefield least-squares reverse time migration
    Davydenko, Mikhail
    Verschuur, Eric
    [J]. GEOPHYSICS, 2021, 86 (05) : WC67 - WC74
  • [10] Improving the gradient in least-squares reverse time migration
    Liu, Qiancheng
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICS AND ENGINEERING, 2016, 13 (02) : 172 - 180