The psychometric properties of depression screening tools in primary healthcare settings: A systematic review

被引:106
|
作者
El-Den, Sarira [1 ]
Chen, Timothy F. [1 ]
Gan, Yuh-Lin [1 ]
Wong, Eling [1 ]
O'Reilly, Claire L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Fac Pharm, Bldg A15, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia
关键词
Psychometric; Depression; Screening; Primary healthcare; 4-DIMENSIONAL SYMPTOM QUESTIONNAIRE; CASE-FINDING INSTRUMENTS; COMMON MENTAL-DISORDERS; MAJOR DEPRESSION; INVENTORY-II; VALIDATION; VALIDITY; ANXIETY; VERSION; BECK;
D O I
10.1016/j.jad.2017.08.060
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Consensus on a tool for depression screening among adults in primary healthcare (PHC) settings is lacking. This systematic review aimed to explore the psychometric properties of depression screening tools. Methods: A systematic literature search composed of four terms (screening AND psychometric AND depression AND primary healthcare) was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO and MEDLINE, between January 1995 through October 2015. Studies that aimed to psychometrically test a depression screening tool among the general adult population in a PHC setting were included. Studies exploring the diagnostic properties of depression screening tools among specific populations were excluded. Results: Sixty publications, evaluating the psychometric properties of 55 tools or adaptations, were included. Studies were conducted in 24 countries and 18 languages on 48234 adults. The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 was the most evaluated tool with 14 studies evaluating its psychometric properties. Fifty-four studies reported on at least one measure of receiver operating characteristics. Sensitivity and specificity values ranged from 28% to 100% and 43% to 100%, respectively. Cronbach alpha values ranged from 0.56 to 0.94. Other forms of reliability and validity testing were less consistently and commonly reported. Limitations: The inclusion of studies regardless of methodological quality or design may have limited generalizability, but allowed for a comprehensive and detailed overview of the current literature. Conclusions: Depression screening tools vary in their psychometric properties. The PHQ-9 was the most extensively psychometrically tested tool. This systematic review may aid PHC professionals in choosing a depression screening tool for universal use as it provides a comprehensive overview of their psychometric properties.
引用
收藏
页码:503 / 522
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Psychometric and Pragmatic Properties of Social Risk Screening Tools: A Systematic Review
    Henrikson, Nora B.
    Blasi, Paula R.
    Dorsey, Caitlin N.
    Mettert, Kayne D.
    Nguyen, Matthew B.
    Walsh-Bailey, Callie
    Macuiba, Jennifer
    Gottlieb, Laura M.
    Lewis, Cara C.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2019, 57 (06) : S13 - S24
  • [2] A systematic review of the psychometric properties of tools for measuring depression in youths with intellectual disability
    Benarous, Xavier
    Walesa, Sandy
    Guile, Jean-Marc
    Cravero, Cora
    Consoli, Angele
    Cohen, David
    Young, Heloise
    Labelle, Real
    Lahaye, Helene
    [J]. EUROPEAN CHILD & ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 2024,
  • [3] Psychometric properties of screening questionnaires to detect depression in primary healthcare setting in rural Ethiopia
    Kassahun Habtamu
    Rahel Birhane
    Girmay Medhin
    Charlotte Hanlon
    Abebaw Fekadu
    [J]. BMC Primary Care, 23
  • [4] Psychometric properties of screening questionnaires to detect depression in primary healthcare setting in rural Ethiopia
    Habtamu, Kassahun
    Birhane, Rahel
    Medhin, Girmay
    Hanlon, Charlotte
    Fekadu, Abebaw
    [J]. BMC PRIMARY CARE, 2022, 23 (01):
  • [5] Screening for Depression in Adult Patients in Primary Care Settings: A Systematic Evidence Review
    O'Connor, Elizabeth A.
    Whitlock, Evelyn P.
    Beil, Tracy L.
    Gaynes, Bradley N.
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2009, 151 (11) : 793 - W265
  • [6] A systematic review of the psychometric properties of bronchiolitis assessment tools
    Davies, Clare J.
    Waters, Donna
    Marshall, Andrea
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2017, 73 (02) : 286 - 301
  • [7] Depression screening tools in persons with epilepsy: A systematic review of validated tools
    Gill, Stephanie J.
    Lukmanji, Sara
    Fiest, Kirsten M.
    Patten, Scott B.
    Wiebe, Samuel
    Jette, Nathalie
    [J]. EPILEPSIA, 2017, 58 (05) : 695 - 705
  • [8] Psychometric Properties of the Cardiac Depression Scale: A Systematic Review
    Chavez, Carolina A.
    Ski, Chantal F.
    Thompson, David R.
    [J]. HEART LUNG AND CIRCULATION, 2014, 23 (07): : 610 - 618
  • [9] Assessing safety climate in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of the adequacy of the psychometric properties of survey measurement tools
    Gheed Alsalem
    Paul Bowie
    Jillian Morrison
    [J]. BMC Health Services Research, 18
  • [10] Assessing safety climate in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of the adequacy of the psychometric properties of survey measurement tools
    Alsalem, Gheed
    Bowie, Paul
    Morrison, Jillian
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2018, 18