Privatization, competition, and budget constraints: Disciplining enterprises in Russia

被引:16
|
作者
Earle, JS
Estrin, S
机构
[1] London Business Sch, Fac Econ, London NW1 4SA, England
[2] Upjohn Co, Inst Employment Res, Kalamazoo, MI 49007 USA
来源
ECONOMICS OF PLANNING | 2003年 / 36卷 / 01期
关键词
competition; enterprise performance; import discipline; market structure; privatization; Russia; soft budget constraints; subsidies; transition;
D O I
10.1023/B:ECOP.0000005749.89697.13
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We investigate whether privatization, competitive forces, and the hardening of budget constraints played efficiency-enhancing roles in Russia in the immediate post-privatization period. We find evidence of a positive impact of privatization on labor productivity: a 10% point increase in private share ownership raises real sales per employee by 3-5%. The evidence on product market competition is weaker, depending on model specification. Soft budget constraints are usually found to reduce restructuring but the effect is small and insignificant. We find that in terms of their impacts on productivity, privatization and subsidy reduction are substitutes; privatization and competition (measured as the geographic scope of markets) are complements; and that competition and subsidy reduction are independent.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 22
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条