Cognitive and Neurophysiological Effects of Non-invasive Brain Stimulation in Stroke Patients after Motor Rehabilitation

被引:26
|
作者
D'Agata, Federico [1 ]
Peila, Elena [1 ]
Cicerale, Alessandro [1 ]
Caglio, Marcella M. [1 ]
Caroppo, Paola [1 ,2 ]
Vighetti, Sergio [1 ]
Piedimonte, Alessandro [1 ]
Minuto, Alice [3 ]
Campagnoli, Marcello [3 ]
Salatino, Adriana [4 ]
Molo, Mario T. [4 ]
Mortara, Paolo [1 ]
Pinessi, Lorenza [1 ]
Massazza, Giuseppe [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Turin, Dept Neurosci, Turin, Italy
[2] Fdn IRCCS Ist Neurol Carlo Besta, UO Neurol Neuropathol 5, Milan, Italy
[3] Univ Turin, Phys Med & Rehabil, Turin, Italy
[4] Molo ONLUS, Turin, Italy
来源
关键词
non-invasive brain stimulation; transcranial magnetic stimulation; transcranial direct current stimulation; mirror-box therapy; stroke rehabilitation; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; DEPRESSIVE SYMPTOMS; SYNAPTIC PLASTICITY; CUTANEOUS STIMULI; PARIETAL CORTEX; IMPAIRMENT; RECOVERY; ATTENTION; LIMB; FMRI;
D O I
10.3389/fnbeh.2016.00135
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The primary aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of two specific Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation (NIBS) paradigms, the repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS), and transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS), in the upper limb rehabilitation of patients with stroke. Short and long term outcomes (after 3 and 6 months, respectively) were evaluated. We measured, at multiple time points, the manual dexterity using a validated clinical scale (ARAT), electroencephalography auditory event related potentials, and neuropsychological performances in patients with chronic stroke of middle severity. Thirty four patients were enrolled and randomized. The intervention group was treated with a NIBS protocol longer than usual, applying a second cycle of stimulation, after a washout period, using different techniques in the two cycles (rTMS/tDCS). We compared the results with a control group treated with sham stimulation. We split the data analysis into three studies. In this first study we examined if a cumulative effect was clinically visible. In the second study we compared the effects of the two techniques. In the third study we explored if patients with minor cognitive impairment have most benefit from the treatment and if cognitive and motor outcomes were correlated. We found that the impairment in some cognitive domains cannot be considered an exclusion criterion for rehabilitation with NIBS. ERR improved, related to cognitive and attentional processes after stimulation on the motor cortex, but transitorily. This effect could be linked to the restoration of hemispheric balance or by the effects of distant connections. In our study the effects of the two NIBS were comparable, with some advantages using tDCS vs. rTMS in stroke rehabilitation. Finally we found that more than one cycle (2-4 weeks), spaced out by washout periods, should be used, only in responder patients, to obtain clinical relevant results.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Non-invasive brain stimulation to enhance cognitive rehabilitation after stroke
    Draaisma, Laurijn R.
    Wessel, Maximilian J.
    Hurnmel, Friedhelm C.
    [J]. NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 2020, 719
  • [2] Ipsilateral motor pathways after stroke: implications for non-invasive brain stimulation
    Bradnam, Lynley V.
    Stinear, Cathy M.
    Byblow, Winston D.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2013, 7
  • [3] Non-invasive brain stimulation in rehabilitation
    Kesikburun, Serdar
    [J]. TURKISH JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2022, 68 (01): : 1 - 8
  • [4] Effects of non-invasive brain stimulation for upper limb rehabilitation in acute stroke patients - A controlled clinical trial
    Wong, K. H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2017, 381 : 839 - 839
  • [5] Can Motor Recovery in Stroke Be Improved by Non-invasive Brain Stimulation?
    Rothwell, John C.
    [J]. PROGRESS IN MOTOR CONTROL: THEORIES AND TRANSLATIONS, 2016, 957 : 313 - 323
  • [6] Non-invasive brain stimulation for fine motor improvement after stroke: a meta-analysis
    O'Brien, A. T.
    Bertolucci, F.
    Torrealba-Acosta, G.
    Huerta, R.
    Fregni, F.
    Thibaut, A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2018, 25 (08) : 1017 - 1026
  • [7] Non-invasive Brain Stimulation (NIBS) in Motor Recovery After Stroke: Concepts to Increase Efficacy
    Morishita T.
    Hummel F.C.
    [J]. Current Behavioral Neuroscience Reports, 2017, 4 (3) : 280 - 289
  • [8] Recruitment issues with non-invasive brain stimulation in stroke patients
    Learmonth, G.
    Muir, K. W.
    Benwell, C.
    Walters, M.
    Harvey, M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STROKE, 2018, 13 : 61 - 61
  • [9] Theta burst stimulation a new paradigm of non-invasive brain stimulation for post-stroke upper limb motor rehabilitation
    Khan, Fayaz
    Chevidikunnan, Faisal
    [J]. TURKISH JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2017, 63 (02): : 193 - 196
  • [10] Neurobiological after-effects of non-invasive brain stimulation
    Cirillo, G.
    Di Pino, G.
    Capone, F.
    Ranieri, F.
    Florio, L.
    Todisco, V.
    Tedeschi, G.
    Funke, K.
    Di Lazzaro, V.
    [J]. BRAIN STIMULATION, 2017, 10 (01) : 1 - 18