Three versus 12-month dual antiplatelet therapy duration in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

被引:2
|
作者
Selvaraj, Vijairam [1 ]
Chatterjee, Saurav [2 ]
Hirai, Taishi [3 ]
Abbott, J. Dawn [4 ]
Bavishi, Chirag [3 ]
机构
[1] Brown Univ, Miriam Hosp, Dept Med, Warren Alpert Med Sch, Providence, RI USA
[2] Zucker Sch Med, Div Cardiol, Northwell Hlth, New York, NY USA
[3] Univ Missouri, Div Cardiol, Sch Med, Columbia, MO 65212 USA
[4] Brown Univ, Lifespan Cardiovasc Inst, Div Cardiol, Warren Alpert Med Sch, Providence, RI USA
关键词
acute coronary syndrome; bleeding; DAPT; outcomes; percutaneous intervention; CARDIOVASCULAR EVENTS; ELUTING STENTS; CLOPIDOGREL; MONOTHERAPY; TICAGRELOR; ASPIRIN; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1002/ccd.30467
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction The American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology guidelines on dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) recommend at least 12 months of a P2Y12 inhibitor and low dose aspirin in patients with an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) treated with a stent. Since that recommendation, several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have studied an abbreviated duration of DAPT in ACS. Therefore, we sought to perform a meta-analysis of RCTs comparing 3- versus 12-month DAPT in patients presenting with ACS undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central databases were searched until July 31, 2022, for RCTs comparing 3- versus 12-month DAPT in patients with ACS undergoing PCI. Outcomes assessed were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), stent thrombosis (ST) and bleeding. A random-effects model was used to calculate pooled relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results We included 5 trials comprising 16,781 patients with an ACS that underwent PCI. There was no significant difference in MACE (RR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.76-1.11), cardiovascular mortality (RR: 1.26; 95% CI: 0.38-4.17), or all-cause mortality (RR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.48-1.77) between the 2 groups. In addition, there was no difference in rates of MI (RR: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.74-1.30), or ST (RR: 1.30; 95% CI: 0.55-3.05) between 3- and 12-month DAPT. However, compared with 12-month DAPT, 3-month DAPT significantly reduced risk of major bleeding (RR: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.43-0.64). Conclusions In patients with ACS undergoing PCI, 3-month DAPT reduced risk of bleeding without evidence of harm.
引用
收藏
页码:1151 / 1158
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] ONE-MONTH DURATION OF DUAL ANTIPLATELET THERAPY IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION: A META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS
    Mohamed, Mohamed Maali G.
    Shaikh, Safia
    Osman, Mohammed
    Kheiri, Babikir
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2022, 79 (09) : 674 - 674
  • [2] One-Month Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Mohamed, Mohamed Maali Gumaa
    Shaikh, Safia
    Osman, Mohammed
    Kheiri, Babikir
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2021, 78 (19) : B73 - B73
  • [3] Meta-analysis of duration of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome after percutaneous coronary intervention
    Khan, Safi U.
    Bin Riaz, Irbaz
    Rahman, Hammad
    Lone, Ahmed N.
    Raza, Munis
    Khan, Muhammad Shahzeb
    Riaz, Anum
    Kaluski, Edo
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 26 (04) : 429 - 432
  • [4] Duration of dual antiplatelet therapy and outcome in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous revascularization: A meta-analysis of 11 randomized trials
    Verdoia, Monica
    Khedi, Elvin
    Ceccon, Claudia
    Suryapranata, Harry
    De Luca, Giuseppe
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 264 : 30 - 38
  • [5] Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients with an Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    Bavishi, Chirag
    Trivedi, Vrinda
    Singh, Mandeep
    Katz, Edward
    Messerli, Franz H.
    Bangalore, Sripal
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2017, 130 (11): : 1325.e1 - 1325.e12
  • [6] Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    张步春
    车文良
    刘伟静
    徐亚伟
    South China Journal of Cardiology, 2010, 11 (04) : 238 - 245
  • [7] Prasugrel versus ticagrelor in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention; a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Rodriguez, Z.
    Valdecanas, A.
    Palileo, N.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2020, 41 : 1465 - 1465
  • [8] Safety and Efficacy of Ticagrelor versus Clopidogrel in East Asian Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Treated with Dual Antiplatelet Therapy: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Li, Jingyuan
    Wang, Qian
    Wu, Chunliu
    Qu, Xiaoyu
    Zhang, Lei
    He, Xiaofeng
    Ma, Sicong
    Qiu, Miaohan
    Wang, Xiaozeng
    CARDIOLOGY, 2023, 148 (04) : 363 - 373
  • [9] Meta-analysis of Unguided Deescalation of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    Mohamed, Mohamed M. G.
    Shaikh, Safia
    Osman, Mohammed
    Kheiri, Babikir
    TH OPEN, 2022, 06 (02) : e144 - e146
  • [10] Optimal Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: Insights From a Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials
    Kuno, Toshiki
    Ueyama, Hiroki
    Takagi, Hisato
    Fox, John
    Bangalore, Sripal
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 76 (17) : B109 - B110