Evaluation of the long-term cost-effectiveness of insulin detemir compared with neutral protamine hagedorn insulin in patients with type 1 diabetes using a basal-bolus regimen in Sweden

被引:15
|
作者
Valentine, William J. [1 ]
Aagren, Mark [2 ]
Haglund, Mattias [3 ,4 ]
Ericsson, Asa [3 ]
Gschwend, Manuela H. [5 ]
机构
[1] Ossian Hlth Econ & Commun, Basel, Switzerland
[2] Novo Nordisk Inc, Princeton, NJ USA
[3] Novo Nordisk Scandinavia AB, Malmo, Sweden
[4] NeuroSearch AS, Ballerup, Denmark
[5] IMS Hlth, Basel, Switzerland
关键词
Cost-effectiveness; costs; insulin detemir; NPH insulin; Sweden; type; 1; diabetes; NPH INSULIN; GLYCEMIC CONTROL; HEALTH-CARE; RISK; PEOPLE; HYPOGLYCEMIA; OUTCOMES; DISEASE; UTILITY; ASPART;
D O I
10.1177/1403494810379290
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Aims: To evaluate the long-term clinical and economic outcomes associated with insulin detemir and neutral protamine hagedorn (NPH) insulin in combination with mealtime insulin aspart in patients with type 1 diabetes in Sweden, based on data from a two-year, multi-national, open-label, randomized, controlled trial. Methods: Insulin detemir was associated with significant improvements in glycaemic control after 24 months (HbA1c 7.36% versus 7.58%, mean difference -0.22%, p = 0.022) and major hypoglycaemic events (69% risk reduction, p = 0.001) versus NPH. Patients treated with detemir gained less weight (1.7 versus 2.7 kg, P = 0.024). Based on these findings, a published and validated computer model (IMS CORE Diabetes Model) was used to estimate life-expectancy, quality-adjusted life expectancy and both direct medical costs and indirect costs. Results: Basal-bolus therapy with insulin detemir was projected to improve life expectancy by 0.14 years (15.02 +/- 0.19 versus 14.88 +/- 0.18 years) and quality-adjusted life expectancy by 0.53 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) versus NPH (8.35 +/- 0.11 versus 7.82 +/- 0.10 QALYs). Improvements in QALYs were driven by avoided or delayed diabetes-related complications and fewer hypoglycaemic events. Direct medical costs over patient lifetimes were SEK 26,144 higher in the insulin detemir arm (SEK 995,025 +/- 19,580 versus 968,881 +/- 19,769), leading to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of SEK 49,757 per QALY gained. Capturing indirect costs led to insulin detemir being cost saving over patient lifetimes, by SEK 80,113, compared to NPH (SEK 2,959,909 +/- 64,727 versus 3,040,022 +/- 62,317). Conclusions: Compared with NPH, insulin detemir is likely to be cost-effective from a healthcare payer perspective and dominant from a societal perspective in patients with type 1 diabetes in Sweden.
引用
收藏
页码:79 / 87
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条