Development and validation of a questionnaire to identify learning-oriented group interactions in PBL

被引:34
|
作者
Visschers-Pleijers, AJSF
Dolmans, DHJM
Wolfhagen, IHAP
van der Vleuten, CPM
机构
[1] Maastricht Univ, Dept Educ Dev & Res, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] Maastricht Univ, Sch Med, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1080/01421590500046395
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Collaborative learning attracts attention because of its potential as a powerful learning strategy. This also holds for PBL. However, group work in PBL sometimes encounters problems and the quality of interaction is not always at the desired level. The aim of the present study was to develop and validate a questionnaire to assess the quality of learning-oriented group interactions in PBL in an uncomplicated way. The questionnaire, to be completed by students involved in PBL, contained items on three group-interaction dimensions: exploratory questions, cumulative reasoning and handling conflicts. It was validated by means of confirmatory factor analysis and regression analysis, the latter to investigate the relation between the three-dimension model and the tutorial group's productivity. The factors underlying the questionnaire were confirmed by the data in a linear structural analysis of the data. The regression analysis showed that the `exploratory questions' and `cumulative reasoning' factors explained together 26% of the variance of the tutorial group's productivity. This study provided evidence for the validity of the questionnaire. The instrument contains tips for students and tutors to stimulate deep processing interactions in the tutorial group. Nevertheless, it seems useful to investigate the external validity of the questionnaire.
引用
收藏
页码:375 / 381
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Student perspectives on learning-oriented interactions in the tutorial group
    Visschers-Pleijers, AJSF
    Dolmans, DHJM
    Wolfhagen, IHAP
    Van der Vleuten, CPM
    [J]. ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2005, 10 (01) : 23 - 35
  • [2] Student Perspectives on Learning-Oriented Interactions in the Tutorial Group
    Astrid J. S. F. Visschers-Pleijers
    Diana H. J. M. Dolmans
    Ineke H. A. P. Wolfhagen
    Cees P. M. Van der. Vleuten
    [J]. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 2005, 10 : 23 - 35
  • [3] Development and Validation of an Instrument Measuring EFL Teachers' Perceptions and Practices in Learning-Oriented Assessment
    Domsky, Javad Gholami
    Zareian, Gholamreza
    Ashraf, Hamid
    Khodabakhshzadeh, Hossein
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ASIA TEFL, 2022, 19 (02): : 726 - 736
  • [4] Validation studies of the group development questionnaire
    Wheelan, SA
    Hochberger, JM
    [J]. SMALL GROUP RESEARCH, 1996, 27 (01) : 143 - 170
  • [5] Evaluating the 'logical framework approach' towards learning-oriented development evaluation
    Gasper, D
    [J]. PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION AND DEVELOPMENT, 2000, 20 (01) : 17 - 28
  • [6] Questionnaire-based evaluation of mass casuality incident (MCI) exercises A tool for learning-oriented feedback
    Schuette, M.
    Hartart, F.
    [J]. NOTFALL & RETTUNGSMEDIZIN, 2019, 22 (06): : 522 - 527
  • [7] Development and validation of a questionnaire to identify patients with sleep apnea in Mexican populationMexican questionnaire to identify sleep apnea
    Zaira Romero-López
    María Dolores Ochoa-Vázquez
    José Antonio Mata-Marín
    Luis Gerardo Ochoa-Jiménez
    Favio Gerardo Rico-Méndez
    [J]. Sleep and Breathing, 2011, 15 : 113 - 119
  • [8] The Ecology of Resources Model of Context: A Unifying Representation for the Development of Learning-oriented Technologies
    Luckin, Rosemary
    [J]. SECOND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MOBILE, HYBRID, AND ON-LINE LEARNING (ELML 2010), 2010, : 47 - 52
  • [9] Validation of the German group development (GD) questionnaire
    Leuteritz, Jan-Paul
    Navarro, Jose
    Czakert, Jan Philipp
    Berger, Rita
    [J]. CURRENT PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 41 (07) : 4321 - 4328
  • [10] Validation of the German group development (GD) questionnaire
    Jan-Paul Leuteritz
    Jose Navarro
    Jan Philipp Czakert
    Rita Berger
    [J]. Current Psychology, 2022, 41 : 4321 - 4328