Performance of GitHub Open-Source Software Project: An Empirical Analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Joy, Abin [1 ]
Thangavelu, Senthilkumar [1 ]
Jyotishi, Amalendu [1 ]
机构
[1] Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Amrita Sch Business, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
关键词
Open source software; GitHub; forks count; primary language intensity; watchers; econometric analysis; SUCCESS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
The phenomenon of open-source software (OSS) has gained importance among the information technology (IT) firms and software entrepreneurial ventures in the recent years due to its advantages over proprietary closed software including high level of innovation, low cost of development, availability of reusable architectural and functional component, free and unrestrictive access to the source codes. The firms have started recognizing the importance and value of the open source software over the proprietary closed software. It is important to understand and analyze various characteristics of the OSS projects which influence their performance. In this research, we examine OSS project characteristics forks count, number of contributors, project age, project size, project owner, number of programming languages used, primary language intensity, and watchers using 130 project repositories which are started in 2017 from GitHub one of the leading web-based Git version control repository hosting services. A conceptual model of OSS Project performance and hypotheses are developed. The results conclude that the number of programming languages, the project size, the number of contributors, and the project age are showing significant positive influence on the OSS project performance. The project ownership and the primary language are not showing any significant influence on the OSS project performance.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] GitHub Projects. Quality Analysis of Open-Source Software
    Jarczyk, Oskar
    Gruszka, Blazej
    Jaroszewicz, Szymon
    Bukowski, Leszek
    Wierzbicki, Adam
    [J]. SOCIAL INFORMATICS, SOCINFO 2014, 2014, 8851 : 80 - 94
  • [2] Analysis of Intercrossed Open-Source Software Repositories Data in GitHub
    Farah, Gabriel
    Correal, Dario
    [J]. 2013 8TH COMPUTING COLOMBIAN CONFERENCE (8CCC), 2013, : 37 - 42
  • [3] Evolution Model of Open-Source Software Projects in GitHub
    Wang, Hongbing
    Ji, Haoran
    [J]. 2022 2ND IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (SEAI 2022), 2022, : 135 - 145
  • [4] Determinants of Open Source Software Project Performance: A Stage-wise Analysis of GitHub Projects
    Thangavelu, Senthilkumar
    Jyotishi, Amalendu
    [J]. SIGMIS-CPR'18: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2018 ACM SIGMIS CONFERENCE ON COMPUTERS AND PEOPLE RESEARCH, 2018, : 41 - 42
  • [5] The Influence of Sponsorship on Open-Source Software Developers' Activities on GitHub
    Wang, Yaxin
    Wang, Liang
    Hu, Hao
    Jiang, Jing
    Kuang, Hongyu
    Tao, Xianping
    [J]. 2022 IEEE 46TH ANNUAL COMPUTERS, SOFTWARE, AND APPLICATIONS CONFERENCE (COMPSAC 2022), 2022, : 924 - 933
  • [6] GitHub Statistics as a Measure of the Impact of Open-Source Bioinformatics Software
    Dozmorov, Mikhail G.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN BIOENGINEERING AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2018, 6
  • [7] Is this GitHub project maintained? Measuring the level of maintenance activity of open-source projects
    Coelho, Jailton
    Valente, Marco Tulio
    Milen, Luciano
    Silva, Luciana L.
    [J]. INFORMATION AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 122
  • [8] An Empirical Study of Architectural Decay in Open-Source Software
    Duc Minh Le
    Link, Daniel
    Shahbazian, Arman
    Medvidovic, Nenad
    [J]. 2018 IEEE 15TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURE (ICSA), 2018, : 176 - 185
  • [9] An Empirical Exploration of Regularities in Open-Source Software Lexicons
    Pierret, Derrin
    Poshyvanyk, Denys
    [J]. ICPC: 2009 IEEE 17TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PROGRAM COMPREHENSION, 2009, : 228 - 232
  • [10] Open-source software for geospatial analysis
    Isamar M. Cortés
    [J]. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 2023, 4 : 143 - 143