Policy-level interventions and work-related psychosocial risk management in the European Union

被引:37
|
作者
Leka, Stavroula [1 ]
Jain, Aditya [1 ]
Zwetsloot, Gerard [2 ]
Cox, Tom [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Inst Work Hlth & Org, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
[2] TNO Work & Employment, Hoofddorp, Netherlands
来源
WORK AND STRESS | 2010年 / 24卷 / 03期
关键词
psychosocial risk management; work-related stress; policy-level interventions; European Union; ORGANIZATION;
D O I
10.1080/02678373.2010.519918
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
There exists a substantial degree of diversity across strategies to prevent and manage work-related psychosocial risks and their associated health effects. Whereas it is common to distinguish between organizational and individual interventions, the important level of policy-level interventions has been largely neglected in the mainstream academic literature. Despite a number of significant developments towards the management of psychosocial risks that have been achieved at the policy level in the European Union (EU), these initiatives have not had the impact anticipated both by experts and policy makers. This paper discusses the policy context to the management of work-related psychosocial risks in the EU, identifying major achievements and challenges in relation to policy and practice. It draws on the findings of the PRIMA-EF project, a policy-oriented research programme funded by the European Commission's 6th Framework Programme for Research. It is concluded that although a common policy context in the area of psychosocial risk management has developed in the EU, there still exists great variation in the translation of these initiatives into practice in different EU member states. Moreover, evaluation in this area is sporadic, even though it could inform the way forward as concerns both policy and practice developments.
引用
收藏
页码:298 / 307
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Addressing psychosocial work-related stress interventions: A systematic review
    Restrepo, Julia
    Lemos, Mariantonia
    [J]. WORK-A JOURNAL OF PREVENTION ASSESSMENT & REHABILITATION, 2021, 70 (01): : 53 - 62
  • [2] Evaluation of national work-related psychosocial risk management policies: An international review of the literature
    Potter, Rachael
    Jamieson, Stephanie
    Jain, Aditya
    Leka, Stavroula
    Dollard, Maureen
    O'Keeffe, Valerie
    [J]. SAFETY SCIENCE, 2022, 154
  • [3] The role of policy for the management of psychosocial risks at the workplace in the European Union
    Leka, Stavroula
    Jain, Aditya
    Iavicoli, Sergio
    Vartia, Maarit
    Ertel, Michael
    [J]. SAFETY SCIENCE, 2011, 49 (04) : 558 - 564
  • [4] The European policy context for the management of psychosocial risks at work
    Leka, Stavroula
    [J]. SAFETY AND HEALTH AT WORK, 2022, 13 : S63 - S63
  • [5] Work-related stress, risk management and Management Standards
    Cox, T
    [J]. WORK AND STRESS, 2004, 18 (02): : 89 - 90
  • [6] Work-related psychosocial risks of the Family Health nurse and management strategies
    Celestino, Lazaro Clarindo
    Leal, Laura Andrian
    Alves Lopes, Olivia Cristina
    Henriques, Silvia Helena
    [J]. REVISTA DA ESCOLA DE ENFERMAGEM DA USP, 2020, 54
  • [7] Improving work-related psychosocial risk management: A mixed methods evaluation of the factors influencing inspectors' practice
    Steel, Emma
    Malinen, Sanna K.
    Naswall, Katharina
    [J]. SAFETY SCIENCE, 2025, 181
  • [8] The benefits of interventions for work-related stress
    van der Klink, JJL
    Blonk, RWB
    Schene, AH
    van Dijk, FJH
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2001, 91 (02) : 270 - 276
  • [9] Evaluating Cardiovascular Risk in Fire Fighters: Implications for Work-Related Interventions
    Kazmierczak, Kristy
    Lawson, Barbara
    Boura, Judy
    deJong, Adam
    Rochlen, Jeff
    Franklin, Barry
    [J]. MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2010, 42 (05): : 586 - 586
  • [10] Work-related stress as a risk factor for WMSDs: Implications for ergonomics interventions
    Devereux, J
    [J]. CONTEMPORARY ERGONOMICS 2003, 2003, : 59 - 64