Patient-reported outcomes after Low-dose-rate versus High-dose-rate brachytherapy boost in combination with external beam radiation for intermediate and high risk prostate cancer

被引:4
|
作者
Dhere, Vishal R. [1 ]
Fischer-Valuck, Benjamin W. [1 ]
Goyal, Subir [2 ]
Liu, Yuan [2 ]
Morgan, Tiffany M. [3 ]
Ghavidel, Elizabeth [1 ]
Moghanaki, Drew M. [1 ]
Hershatter, Bruce W. [1 ]
Patel, Pretesh R. [1 ]
Jani, Ashesh B. [1 ]
Godette, Karen D. [1 ]
Rossi, Peter J. [4 ]
Patel, Sagar A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Emory Univ, Winship Canc Inst, Dept Radiat Oncol, 615 Peachtree St NE, Atlanta, GA 30308 USA
[2] Emory Univ, Dept Biostat & Bioinformat, Atlanta, GA 30308 USA
[3] New Hanover Reg Med Ctr, Wilmington, NC USA
[4] Valley View Hosp, Calaway Young Canc Ctr, Glenwood Springs, CO USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Prostate cancer; Brachytherapy boost; LDR; HDR; toxicity; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; ANDROGEN SUPPRESSION; SEXUAL TOXICITY; ASCENDE-RT; RADIOTHERAPY; ESCALATION; THERAPY; DOSIMETRY; INDEX;
D O I
10.1016/j.brachy.2021.07.005
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: Addition of a brachytherapy boost to external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) reduces prostate cancer (PCa) recurrence at the expense of genitourinary (GU) toxicity. Whether brachytherapy boost technique, specifically low-dose-rate (LDR-BT) versus high-dose-rate (HDR-BT), impacts treatment-related toxicity is unclear. METHODS: Between 2012-2018, 106 men with intermediate/high risk PCa underwent EBRT (37.5-45 Gy in 1.8-2.5 Gy/fraction) plus brachytherapy boost, either with LDR-BT (110 Gy I-125 or 100 Gy Pd-103; n = 51) or HDR-BT (15 Gy x1 Ir-192; n = 55). Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) were assessed by International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC-CP) surveys at 3-6-month intervals for up to three years following treatment, with higher scores indicating more severe toxicity. Provider-reported GU and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity was graded per CTCAE v5.0 at each follow-up. Linear mixed models comparing PROs between LDR-BT versus HDR-BT were fitted. Stepwise multivariable analysis (MVA) was performed to account for age, gland size, androgen deprivation therapy use, and alpha-blocker medication use. Incidence rates of grade 2 + GU/GI toxicity was compared using Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: Use of LDR-BT was associated with greater change in IPSS (p = 0.003) and EPIC-CP urinary irritative score (p = 0.002) compared with HDR-BT, but effect size diminished over time (LDR-BT versus HDR-BT: baseline to 6-/24-month mean IPSS change, + 6.4/+ 1.4 versus + 2.7/-3.0, respectively; mean EPIC-CP irritative/obstructive change, + 2.5/+ 0.1 versus + 0.9/+ 0.1, respectively). Results remained significant on MVA. Post-treatment grade 2 + GU toxicity was significantly higher in the LDR-BT group (67.5% versus 42.9% for LDR-BT and HDR-BT, respectively; p < 0.001). There were no differences between groups in incontinence, bowel function, and erectile function, or grade 2 + GI toxicity. CONCLUSION: Compared with LDR-BT, HDR-BT was associated with lower acute patient-and provider-reported GU toxicity. (C) 2021 American Brachytherapy Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1130 / 1138
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Toxicity Outcomes After Low-Dose-Rate vs. High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy Boost in Combination With External Beam Radiation for Intermediate and High-Risk Prostate Cancer
    Dhere, V. R.
    Fischer-Valuck, B. W.
    Goyal, S.
    Liu, Y.
    Morgan, T.
    Ghavidel, B.
    Moghanaki, D.
    Hershatter, B.
    Patel, P. R.
    Jani, A.
    Godette, K. D.
    Rossi, P. J.
    Patel, S. A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2021, 111 (03): : E272 - E272
  • [2] Population-based patient-reported quality of life outcomes following low-dose-rate versus high-dose-rate brachytherapy monotherapy for low-intermediate risk prostate cancer
    Ong, Wee Loon
    Evans, Melanie
    Papa, Nathan
    Williams, Scott
    Millar, Jeremy
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2023, 67 (07) : 789 - 795
  • [3] Comparison of Patient-reported Outcomes After External Beam Radiation Therapy and Combined External Beam With Low-dose-rate Brachytherapy Boost in Men With Localized Prostate Cancer
    Lee, Daniel J.
    Barocas, Daniel A.
    Zhao, Zhiguo
    Huang, Li-Ching
    Resnick, Matthew J.
    Koyoma, Tatsuki
    Conwill, Ralph
    McCollum, Dan
    Cooperberg, Matthew R.
    Goodman, Michael
    Greenfield, Sheldon
    Hamilton, Ann S.
    Hashibe, Mia
    Kaplan, Sherrie H.
    Paddock, Lisa E.
    Stroup, Antoinette M.
    Wu, Xiao-Cheng
    Penson, David F.
    Hoffman, Karen E.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2018, 102 (01): : 116 - 126
  • [4] High-dose-rate brachytherapy with external beam radiotherapy versus low-dose-rate brachytherapy with or without external beam radiotherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer
    Yamazaki, Hideya
    Masui, Koji
    Suzuki, Gen
    Aibe, Norihiro
    Shimizu, Daisuke
    Kimoto, Takuya
    Yamada, Kei
    Ueno, Akihisa
    Matsugasumi, Toru
    Yamada, Yasuhiro
    Shiraishi, Takumi
    Fujihara, Atsuko
    Okihara, Koji
    Yoshida, Ken
    Nakamura, Satoaki
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)
  • [5] High-dose-rate brachytherapy with external beam radiotherapy versus low-dose-rate brachytherapy with or without external beam radiotherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer
    Hideya Yamazaki
    Koji Masui
    Gen Suzuki
    Norihiro Aibe
    Daisuke Shimizu
    Takuya Kimoto
    Kei Yamada
    Akihisa Ueno
    Toru Matsugasumi
    Yasuhiro Yamada
    Takumi Shiraishi
    Atsuko Fujihara
    Koji Okihara
    Ken Yoshida
    Satoaki Nakamura
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 11
  • [6] Low and high-dose-rate brachytherapy in combination with external beam radiotherapy for high risk prostate cancer
    Solodkiy, V. A.
    Pavlov, A. Yu
    Tsibulskii, A. D.
    Panshin, G. A.
    Dzidzaria, A. G.
    Mirzahanov, R., I
    [J]. ONKOUROLOGIYA, 2021, 17 (02): : 72 - 82
  • [7] High-dose-rate brachytherapy monotherapy versus low-dose-rate brachytherapy with or without external beam radiotherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer
    Yamazaki, Hideya
    Masui, Koji
    Suzuki, Gen
    Nakamura, Satoaki
    Yamada, Kei
    Okihara, Koji
    Shiraishi, Takumi
    Yoshida, Ken
    Kotsuma, Tadayuki
    Tanaka, Eiichi
    Otani, Keisuke
    Yoshioka, Yasuo
    Ogawa, Kazuhiko
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2019, 132 : 162 - 170
  • [8] Adjuvant high-dose-rate and low-dose-rate brachytherapy with external beam radiation in soft tissue sarcoma: A comparison of outcomes
    Pohar, Surjeet
    Haq, Rashid
    Liu, Lizhong
    Koniarczyk, Michael
    Hahn, Seung
    Damron, Timothy
    Aronowitz, Jesse N.
    [J]. BRACHYTHERAPY, 2007, 6 (01) : 53 - 57
  • [9] A comparison of outcomes for patients with intermediate and high risk prostate cancer treated with low dose rate and high dose rate brachytherapy in combination with external beam radiotherapy
    Slevin, Finbar
    Rodda, Sree Lakshmi
    Bownes, Peter
    Murray, Louise
    Bottomley, David
    Wilkinson, Clare
    Adiotomre, Ese
    Al-Qaisieh, Bashar
    Dugdale, Emma
    Hulson, Oliver
    Mason, Joshua
    Smith, Jonathan
    Henry, Ann M.
    [J]. CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2020, 20 : 1 - 8
  • [10] Sigmoid dose delivered by high-dose-rate brachytherapy versus low-dose-rate brachytherapy for cervical cancer
    Holloway, C. L.
    O'Farrell, D. A.
    Cormack, R. A.
    Viswanathan, A. N.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2006, 66 (03): : S165 - S165