Short-Term Memory and Long-Term Memory are Still Different

被引:141
|
作者
Norris, Dennis [1 ]
机构
[1] MRC Cognit & Brain Sci Unit, 15 Chaucer Rd, Cambridge CB2 2EF, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
long-term memory; memory; STM; working memory; IMMEDIATE SERIAL-RECALL; VISUAL WORKING-MEMORY; PHONOLOGICAL SIMILARITY; WORD-FREQUENCY; SELECTIVE IMPAIRMENT; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL EVIDENCE; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; SEMANTIC CONTRIBUTION; REPETITION BLINDNESS; NETWORK MODEL;
D O I
10.1037/bul0000108
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
A commonly expressed view is that short-term memory (STM) is nothing more than activated long-term memory. If true, this would overturn a central tenet of cognitive psychology-the idea that there are functionally and neurobiologically distinct short-and long-term stores. Here I present an updated case for a separation between short- and long-term stores, focusing on the computational demands placed on any STM system. STM must support memory for previously unencountered information, the storage of multiple tokens of the same type, and variable binding. None of these can be achieved simply by activating long-term memory. For example, even a simple sequence of digits such as "1, 3, 1" where there are 2 tokens of the digit "1" cannot be stored in the correct order simply by activating the representations of the digits "1" and "3" in LTM. I also review recent neuroimaging data that has been presented as evidence that STM is activated LTM and show that these data are exactly what one would expect to see based on a conventional 2-store view.
引用
收藏
页码:992 / 1009
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条