The prevalence and impact of different types of open access articles from China and USA

被引:0
|
作者
Zhang, Lin [1 ,2 ]
Wei, Yahui [1 ,2 ]
Huang, Ying [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Sivertsen, Gunnar [5 ]
机构
[1] Wuhan Univ, Sch Informat Management, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[2] Wuhan Univ, Ctr Sci Technol & Educ Assessment CSTEA, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[3] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Ctr R&D Monitoring ECOOM, Leuven, Belgium
[4] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept MSI, Leuven, Belgium
[5] Nordic Inst Studies Innovat Res & Educ, Oslo, Norway
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
CITATION; GOLD;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Compared to the traditional subscription-based business model, Open Access (OA) publishing has many advantages. It can make science accessible to a wider public and expand individual researchers' influence and increase the potential impact of their research. This study covers all articles and reviews published from China and the USA from 2010 to 2019 with the aim of analyzing the prevalence and impact of different types of OA research articles. We find that the USA has a higher percentage of OA publications than China. American OA articles are more frequently in the Green and Bronze types of OA, while China publishes relatively more in Gold journals covered in DOAJ. Regarding citations, hybrid OA publications from American researchers have the highest impact, while the non-OA publications articles have the lowest impact. Green OA publications from Chinese researchers have the highest impact, while those appearing in Gold DOAJ journals have the lowest impact. The differences can be explained by national research evaluation and OA policies.
引用
收藏
页码:1325 / 1336
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Open access to journal articles in dentistry: Prevalence and citation impact
    Hua, Fang
    Sun, Heyuan
    Walsh, Tanya
    Worthington, Helen
    Glenny, Anne-Marie
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2016, 47 : 41 - 48
  • [2] Difference in the impact of open-access papers published by China and the USA
    Yang, Siluo
    Xing, Xin
    Wolfram, Dietmar
    SCIENTOMETRICS, 2018, 115 (02) : 1017 - 1037
  • [3] Difference in the impact of open-access papers published by China and the USA
    Siluo Yang
    Xin Xing
    Dietmar Wolfram
    Scientometrics, 2018, 115 : 1017 - 1037
  • [4] Impact factions: assessing the citation impact of different types of open access repositories
    Jonathan Wheeler
    Ngoc-Minh Pham
    Kenning Arlitsch
    Justin D. Shanks
    Scientometrics, 2022, 127 : 4977 - 5003
  • [5] Impact factions: assessing the citation impact of different types of open access repositories
    Wheeler, Jonathan
    Ngoc-Minh Pham
    Arlitsch, Kenning
    Shanks, Justin D.
    SCIENTOMETRICS, 2022, 127 (08) : 4977 - 5003
  • [6] The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles
    Piwowar, Heather
    Priem, Jason
    Lariviere, Vincent
    Alperin, Juan Pablo
    Matthias, Lisa
    Norlander, Bree
    Farley, Ashley
    West, Jevin
    Haustein, Stefanie
    PEERJ, 2018, 6
  • [7] Open Access Articles Have a Greater Research Impact Than Articles Not Freely Available
    Lewis, Suzanne P.
    EVIDENCE BASED LIBRARY AND INFORMATION PRACTICE, 2006, 1 (03): : 57 - 59
  • [8] Research on differential and interactive impact of China-led and US-led open-access articles
    Mingkun, Wei
    Wei, Quan
    Misra, Sadhana
    Savage, Russell
    JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE, 2023, 49 (01) : 248 - 260
  • [9] Evaluation of impact factors of articles in scientific open access journals in Turkiye
    Alav, Orhan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ASSESSMENT TOOLS IN EDUCATION, 2022, 9 (03): : 713 - 727
  • [10] Open access to journal articles in oncology: current situation and citation impact
    Hua, F.
    Sun, H.
    Walsh, T.
    Glenny, A. -M.
    Worthington, H.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2017, 28 (10) : 2612 - 2617