Scoping study into wound management nurse practitioner models of practice

被引:4
|
作者
Gibb, Michelle A. [1 ]
Edwards, Helen E. [2 ]
Gardner, Glenn E. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Queensland Univ Technol, Inst Hlth & Biomed Innovat, Kelvin Grove, Qld 4059, Australia
[2] Queensland Univ Technol, Fac Hlth, Kelvin Grove, Qld 4059, Australia
[3] Queensland Univ Technol, Kelvin Grove, Qld 4059, Australia
[4] Royal Brisbane & Womens Hosp, Kelvin Grove, Qld 4059, Australia
关键词
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; GENERAL-PRACTITIONERS; PRIMARY-CARE; SATISFACTION; FRAMEWORK; OUTCOMES; QUALITY; COST;
D O I
10.1071/AH14040
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives The primary objective of this research was to investigate wound management nurse practitioner (WMNP) models of service for the purposes of identifying parameters of practice and how patient outcomes are measured. Methods A scoping study was conducted with all authorised WMNPs in Australia from October to December 2012 using survey methodology. A questionnaire was developed to obtain data on the role and practice parameters of authorised WMNPs in Australia. The tool comprised seven sections and included a total of 59 questions. The questionnaire was distributed to all members of the WMNP Online Peer Review Group, to which it was anticipated the majority of WMNPs belonged. Results Twenty-one WMNPs responded (response rate 87%), with the results based on a subset of respondents who stated that, at the time of the questionnaire, they were employed as a WMNP, therefore yielding a response rate of 71% (n=15). Most respondents (93%; n=14) were employed in the public sector, with an average of 64 occasions of service per month. The typical length of a new case consultation was 60min, with 32min for follow ups. The most frequently performed activity was wound photography (83%; n=12), patient, family or carer education (75%; n=12), Doppler ankle-brachial pressure index assessment (58%; n=12), conservative sharp wound debridement (58%; n=12) and counselling (50%; n=12). The most routinely prescribed medications were local anaesthetics (25%; n=12) and oral antibiotics (25%; n=12). Data were routinely collected by 91% of respondents on service-related and wound-related parameters to monitor patient outcomes, to justify and improve health services provided. Conclusion This study yielded important baseline information on this professional group, including data on patient problems managed, the types of interventions implemented, the resources used to accomplish outcomes and how outcomes are measured. What is known about the topic? The nurse practitioner (NP) is an established and legitimised entity of health service in Australia, with NPs in a range of specialities. To date, there is a paucity of research on the role and practice parameters of WMNP in the Australian context. What does this paper add? This paper provides important baseline information on WMNP models of practice in the Australian context, including data on patient problems managed, the types of interventions implemented, the resources used to accomplish outcomes and how outcomes are currently measured. This information will help inform the development of WMNP roles and highlights potential areas of evaluation for WMNP models of care. What are the implications for practitioners? Measurement of outcomes is essential to demonstrate efficacy of NP service. Yet, there is no way currently to measure these outcomes for WMNP service. Nationally consistent data collection on processes of care and patient outcomes supports ongoing development of the WMNP role.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:220 / 227
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Practice management skills for the nurse practitioner
    Sportsman, S
    Hawley, LJ
    Pollock, S
    Varnell, G
    JOURNAL OF PROFESSIONAL NURSING, 2001, 17 (05) : 226 - 232
  • [2] The Key Role of Nurse Researchers in the Evaluation of Nurse Practitioner Models of Practice
    Hungerford, Catherine
    Prosser, Brenton
    Davey, Rachel
    RESEARCH AND THEORY FOR NURSING PRACTICE, 2015, 29 (03) : 214 - 225
  • [3] Nurse practitioner models of care in aged care: a scoping review protocol
    Peters, Micah D. J.
    Marnie, Casey
    JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2022, 20 (08) : 2064 - 2070
  • [4] Nurse practitioner/physician collaborative models of care: a scoping review protocol
    Katherine S. McGilton
    Lynn Haslam-Larmer
    Aria Wills
    Alexandra Krassikova
    Jessica Babineau
    Ben Robert
    Carrie Heer
    Carrie McAiney
    Gail Dobell
    Jennifer Bethell
    Kelly Kay
    Margaret Keatings
    Sharon Kaasalainen
    Sid Feldman
    Souraya Sidani
    Ruth Martin-Misener
    BMC Geriatrics, 23
  • [5] Nurse practitioner/physician collaborative models of care: a scoping review protocol
    McGilton, Katherine S. S.
    Haslam-Larmer, Lynn
    Wills, Aria
    Krassikova, Alexandra
    Babineau, Jessica
    Robert, Ben
    Heer, Carrie
    McAiney, Carrie
    Dobell, Gail
    Bethell, Jennifer
    Kay, Kelly
    Keatings, Margaret
    Kaasalainen, Sharon
    Feldman, Sid
    Sidani, Souraya
    Martin-Misener, Ruth
    BMC GERIATRICS, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [6] Hospital-based nurse practitioner roles and interprofessional practice: A scoping review
    Hurlock-Chorostecki, Christina
    Forchuk, Cheryl
    Orchard, Carole
    van Soeren, Mary
    Reeves, Scott
    NURSING & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2014, 16 (03) : 403 - 410
  • [7] Nurse Practitioner Scope of Practice Regulations and Nurse Practitioner Supply
    Kandrack, Ryan
    Barnes, Hilary
    Martsolf, Grant R.
    MEDICAL CARE RESEARCH AND REVIEW, 2021, 78 (03) : 208 - 217
  • [8] An investigation of the international literature on nurse practitioner private practice models
    Currie, J.
    Chiarella, M.
    Buckley, T.
    INTERNATIONAL NURSING REVIEW, 2013, 60 (04) : 435 - 447
  • [9] Statewide Mapping of Nurse Practitioner Models of Practice Throughout Victoria
    Driscoll, Andrea
    Tori, Kathleen
    Jennings, Natasha
    Schiftan, Dan
    Lowe, Grainne
    JNP- THE JOURNAL FOR NURSE PRACTITIONERS, 2022, 18 (10): : 1052 - 1056
  • [10] The Pursuit of Nurse Practitioner Practice Legislation: A Case Study
    Moore, Catherine
    Kabbe, Angela
    Gibson, Tiffany S.
    Letvak, Susan
    POLICY POLITICS & NURSING PRACTICE, 2020, 21 (04) : 222 - 232