Spinal ropivacaine for lower limb surgery: A dose-response study

被引:13
|
作者
Lee, Ying Y.
Kee, Warwick D. Ngan
Chang, Hang K.
So, Chi L.
Gin, Tony
机构
[1] Kwong Wah Hosp, Dept Anaesthesiol, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Kwong Wah Hosp, Operating Theatre Serv, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Dept Anaesthesia & Intens Care, Shatin, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
来源
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA | 2007年 / 105卷 / 02期
关键词
D O I
10.1213/01.ane.0000267523.66285.57
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: The dose-response relationship for spinal ropivacaine in patients undergoing surgery of the lower extremity has not been fully determined. METHODS: We performed a prospective, randomized, double-blind study of 60 patients scheduled for lower limb surgery under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia. Patients were assigned to receive 1 of 5 doses of intrathecal ropivacaine: 2, 4, 7, 10, or 14 mg diluted to 2.8 mL with normal saline. A dose was considered successful if a sensory block to cold was achieved bilaterally at the T12 dermatome within 20 min and surgery proceeded without supplementation for at least 50 min. RESULTS: Anesthesia was successful in 0, 0, 42, 83, and 100% of the 2, 4, 7, 10, and 14 mg groups, respectively. The derived value for ED50 was 7.6 mg (95% CI: 6.2-8.7 mg) and for ED95 was 11.4 mg (95% CI: 9.7-18.3 mg). The cephalic level of sensory block and the degree of motor block increased with larger doses of ropivacaine. CONCLUSION: The ED50 and ED95 for spinal ropivacaine in lower limb surgery of 50 min duration or less were 7.6 and 11.4 mg, respectively. This provides a useful guide for clinicians to choose the optimal dose of spinal ropivacaine under different clinical situations.
引用
收藏
页码:520 / 523
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [2] Dose-response study of spinal hyperbaric ropivacaine for cesarean section.
    Chen X.Z.
    Chen H.
    Lou A.F.
    Lü C.C.
    [J]. Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE B, 2006, 7 (12): : 992 - 997
  • [3] ROPIVACAINE IN EPIDURAL ANALGESIA - DOSE-RESPONSE STUDY IN ORTHOPEDIC-SURGERY
    NIESEL, HC
    EILINGSFELD, T
    KAISER, H
    KLIMPEL, L
    [J]. ANAESTHESIST, 1990, 39 (05): : A73 - A77
  • [4] Dose response study of lidocaine 1% for spinal anaesthesia for lower limb and perineal surgery
    Liam, BL
    Yim, CF
    Chong, JL
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1998, 45 (07): : 645 - 650
  • [5] Dose response study of lidocaine 1% for spinal anaesthesia for lower limb and perineal surgery
    Beng-Ling Liam
    Cik-Foo Yim
    Jin-Long Chong
    [J]. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia, 1998, 45 : 645 - 650
  • [6] Hypobaric Spinal Anesthesia with Ropivacaine Plus Sufentanil for Traumatic Femoral Neck Surgery in the Elderly: A Dose-Response Study
    Lilot, Marc
    Meuret, Pascal
    Bouvet, Lionel
    Caruso, Liana
    Dabouz, Rabia
    Deleat-Besson, Robert
    Rousselet, Bernard
    Thouverez, Bruno
    Zadam, Abbes
    Allaouchiche, Bernard
    Boselli, Emmanuel
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2013, 117 (01): : 259 - 264
  • [7] Hyperbaric spinal anesthesia with ropivacaine coadministered with sufentanil for cesarean delivery: a dose-response study
    Zheng, Dongyue
    Wu, Guowei
    Qin, Peishun
    Ji, Bin
    Ye, Lisha
    Shi, Tong
    Huang, Huang
    Jin, Lexiao
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2015, 8 (04): : 5739 - 5745
  • [8] Dose-response study of epidural ropivacaine for labor analgesia
    Lee, BB
    Kee, WDN
    Wong, ELY
    Liu, JYW
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2001, 94 (05) : 767 - 772
  • [9] The dose-response of caudal ropivacaine in children
    Koinig, H
    Krenn, CG
    Glaser, C
    Marhofer, P
    Wildling, E
    Brunner, M
    Wallner, T
    Grabner, C
    Klimscha, W
    Semsroth, M
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1999, 90 (05) : 1339 - 1344
  • [10] Comparison of hyperbaric and plain ropivacaine 15 mg in spinal anaesthesia for lower limb surgery
    Kallio, H
    Snäll, EVT
    Tuomas, CA
    Rosenberg, PH
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2004, 93 (05) : 664 - 669