Do Men Receive Information Required for Shared Decision Making About PSA Testing? Results from a National Survey

被引:41
|
作者
Leyva, Bryan [1 ]
Persoskie, Alexander [2 ]
Ottenbacher, Allison [3 ]
Hamilton, Jada G. [4 ]
Allen, Jennifer D. [5 ]
Kobrin, Sarah C. [1 ]
Taplin, Stephen H. [1 ]
机构
[1] NCI, Proc Care Res Branch, Behav Res Program, NIH, 9609 Med Ctr Dr 3E230, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[2] NCI, Basic Biobehav & Psychol Sci Branch, Behav Res Program, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[3] NCI, Sci Res & Technol Branch, Behav Res Program, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[4] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10021 USA
[5] Tufts Univ, Dept Publ Hlth & Community Med, Boston, MA 02111 USA
关键词
Shared decision making; PSA testing; Prostate cancer screening; Uncertainty; Patient-provider communication; PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN; CARE PHYSICIANS USE; RANDOMIZED PROSTATE; SCREENING DECISIONS; SELF-REPORTS; CANCER; GUIDELINES; TRIAL; AIDS; COMMUNICATION;
D O I
10.1007/s13187-015-0870-8
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Most professional organizations, including the American College of Physicians and U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, emphasize that screening for prostate cancer with the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test should only occur after a detailed discussion between the health-care provider and patient about the known risks and potential benefits of the test. In fact, guidelines strongly advise health-care providers to involve patients, particularly those at elevated risk of prostate cancer, in a "shared decision making" (SDM) process about PSA testing. We analyzed data from the National Cancer Institute's Health Information National Trends Survey 2011-2012-a nationally representative, cross-sectional survey-to examine the extent to which health professionals provided men with information critical to SDM prior to PSA testing, including (1) that patients had a choice about whether or not to undergo PSA testing, (2) that not all doctors recommend PSA testing, and (3) that no one is sure if PSA testing saves lives. Over half (55 %) of men between the ages of 50 and 74 reported ever having had a PSA test. However, only 10 % of men, regardless of screening status, reported receiving all three pieces of information: 55 % reported being informed that they could choose whether or not to undergo testing, 22 % reported being informed that some doctors recommend PSA testing and others do not, and 14 % reported being informed that no one is sure if PSA testing actually saves lives. Black men and men with lower levels of education were less likely to be provided this information. There is a need to improve patient-provider communication about the uncertainties associated with the PSA test. Interventions directed at patients, providers, and practice settings should be considered.
引用
收藏
页码:693 / 701
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Do Men Receive Information Required for Shared Decision Making About PSA Testing? Results from a National Survey
    Bryan Leyva
    Alexander Persoskie
    Allison Ottenbacher
    Jada G. Hamilton
    Jennifer D. Allen
    Sarah C. Kobrin
    Stephen H. Taplin
    Journal of Cancer Education, 2016, 31 : 693 - 701
  • [2] Shared Decision Making in Senior Medical Students: Results from a National Survey
    Zeballos-Palacios, Claudia
    Quispe, Renato
    Mongilardi, Nicole
    Diaz-Arocutipa, Carlos
    Mendez-Davalos, Carlos
    Lizarraga, Natalia
    Paz, Aldo
    Montori, Victor M.
    Malaga, German
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2015, 35 (04) : 533 - 538
  • [3] Lack of Shared Decision Making in Cancer Screening Discussions Results from a National Survey
    Hoffman, Richard M.
    Elmore, Joann G.
    Fairfield, Kathleen M.
    Gerstein, Bethany S.
    Levin, Carrie A.
    Pignone, Michael P.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2014, 47 (03) : 251 - 259
  • [4] The challenge of promoting informed, shared decision-making about PSA testing among African-American (AA) men.
    Burack, RC
    George, J
    Coombs, J
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2000, 15 : 56 - 56
  • [5] The Role of Patient Activation in Preferences for Shared Decision Making: Results From a National Survey of US Adults
    Smith, Samuel G.
    Pandit, Anjali
    Rush, Steven R.
    Wolf, Michael S.
    Simon, Carol J.
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH COMMUNICATION, 2016, 21 (01) : 67 - 75
  • [6] Information provision and decision-making in fertility care. Results from a national survey in Germany
    Rauprich, O.
    Berns, E.
    Vollmann, J.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2010, 25 : I95 - I95
  • [7] DECISION MAKING ABOUT SUITABILITY FOR KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION: RESULTS OF A NATIONAL SURVEY OF AUSTRALIAN NEPHROLOGISTS
    Cass, A.
    Cunningham, J.
    Anderson, K.
    Snelling, P.
    Colman, S.
    Devitt, J.
    Preece, C.
    Eris, J.
    NEPHROLOGY, 2006, 11 : A39 - A39
  • [8] What men want: Results from a national survey on decision making for prostate cancer treatment and research participation
    Mendenhall, Nancy P.
    Osian, Sarah M. Rausch
    Bryant, Curtis M.
    Hoppe, Bradford S.
    Morris, Christopher G.
    CTS-CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE, 2021, 14 (06): : 2314 - 2326
  • [9] Effect of shared decision making on racial and ethnic disparity in prostate cancer screening: Results from a national behavioral survey
    Frego, N.
    Labban, M.
    Stone, B., V
    Koelker, M.
    Beatrici, E.
    Filipas, D. K.
    Lughezzani, G.
    Buffi, N. M.
    Abdollah, F.
    Osman, N. Y.
    Solomon, S. R.
    Lipsitz, S. R.
    Kibel, A. S.
    Sammon, J. D.
    Trinh, Q-D
    Cole, A. P.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2023, 83
  • [10] EFFECT OF SHARED DECISION MAKING ON RACIAL AND ETHNIC DISPARITY IN PROSTATE CANCER SCREENING: RESULTS FROM A NATIONAL BEHAVIORAL SURVEY
    Frego, Nicola
    Labban, Muhieddine
    Stone, Benjamin V.
    Koelker, Mara
    Beatrici, Edoardo
    Filipas, Dejan K.
    Lughezzani, Giovanni
    Buffi, Nicolo Maria
    Abdollah, Firas
    Osman, Nora Y.
    Solomon, Sonja R.
    Lipsitz, Stuart R.
    Kibel, Adam S.
    Sammon, Jesse D.
    Quoc-Dien Trinh
    Cole, Alexander P.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 209 : E1049 - E1050