Treatment of kaposiform hemangioendothelioma and tufted angioma

被引:61
|
作者
Liu, Xiao Han [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Li, Jia Ying [4 ]
Qu, Xin Hua [5 ]
Yan, Wei Li [6 ]
Zhang, Ling [2 ,3 ]
Yang, Chi [2 ,3 ]
Zheng, Jia Wei [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Coll Stomatol, Sch Med, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Dept Oral Surg, Shanghai Peoples Hosp 9, Coll Stomatol,Sch Med,Shanghai Key Lab Stomatol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Dept Oral Maxillofacial Head & Neck Surg, Shanghai Peoples Hosp 9, Coll Stomatol,Sch Med,Shanghai Key Lab Stomatol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] Jining Med Univ, Rizhao, Shandong, Peoples R China
[5] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Key Lab Orthoped Implant, Shanghai Peoples Hosp 9, Sch Med, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[6] Fudan Univ, Pudong Inst Prevent Med, Shanghai, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
kaposiform hemangioendothelioma; tufted angioma; Kasabach-Merritt phenomenon; treatment; KASABACH-MERRITT PHENOMENON; VASCULAR ANOMALIES; VINCRISTINE; MANAGEMENT; RISK;
D O I
10.1002/ijc.30216
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
This meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of current treatment modalities for kaposiform hemangioendothelioma and tufted angioma. A systematic review was performed using PubMed (Medline), Web of Science and Embase for clinical studies. The outcome was measured by pooled response rate with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), together with heterogeneity, subgroup analysis, sensitivity analysis and publication bias. Fifteen studies with 244 participants were included in this analysis. Vincristine therapy exhibited a relatively higher response rate (0.72; 95%CI, 0.64-0.79) compared with other therapies including systemic corticosteroid (0.27; 95%CI, 0.17-0.36), interferon (0.36; 95%CI, 0.24-0.48), radiotherapy (0.49; 95%CI, 0.26-0.73), embolization (0.66; 95%CI, 0.48-0.83), aspirin/ticlopidine (0.42; 95%CI, 0.06-0.78) and sirolimus (0.57; 95%CI, 0.00-0.10), in treating KHE/TA. Subgroup analysis indicated that the efficacy of systemic corticosteroids therapy was age-related. The pooled response rate was 0.15 (95%CI, 0.08-0.23) for participants 3.5 months of age and older compared with 0.35 (95% CI, 0.26-0.44) for participants less than 3.5 months. Regarding side effects, systemic corticosteroids treatment was 0.32 (95%CI, 0.15-0.50), vincristine modality was 0.16 (95%CI, 0.08-0.24) and interferon therapy was 0.28 (95%CI, 0.13-0.43). In conclusion, as one of the first reviews evaluating the effect of common therapies in the treatment of KHE/TA, our meta-analysis displayed that vincristine was more effective. Thus, vincristine was the most effective, providing evidence supporting the use of vincristine as a first-line therapy for KHE/TA. What's new? Kaposiform hemangioendothelioma (KHE) and tufted angioma (TA) are vascular tumors that typically occur in infancy and early childhood and present with Kasabach-Merritt syndrome, a life-threatening condition. Given their rarity, currently there is no evidence-based standard therapy for KHE/TA, however. In this meta-analysis of 15 clinical studies, the authors for the first time evaluated the efficacy of common KHE/TA treatments including systemic corticosteroid, vincristine, interferon, radiotherapy, embolization, anti-platelet agents, propranolol and sirolimus. The findings show that vincristine, an inhibitor of endothelial proliferation, is more effective, thus providing strong evidence for the use of vincristine as a first-line treatment modality for KHE/TA.
引用
收藏
页码:1658 / 1666
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Successful Treatment of Kaposiform Hemangioendothelioma and Tufted Angioma With Vincristine
    Fahrtash, Farzan
    McCahon, Emma
    Arbuckle, Susan
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC HEMATOLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2010, 32 (06) : 506 - 510
  • [2] Tacrolimus ointment for the treatment of superficial kaposiform hemangioendothelioma and tufted angioma
    Zhang, Xuepeng
    Yang, Kaiying
    Chen, Siyuan
    Ji, Yi
    JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2019, 46 (10): : 898 - 901
  • [3] The clinical spectrum of kaposiform hemangioendothelioma and tufted angioma
    Croteau, Stacy E.
    Gupta, Deepti
    SEMINARS IN CUTANEOUS MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2016, 35 (03) : 147 - 152
  • [4] Transformation between Kaposiform hemangioendothelioma and tufted angioma
    Chu, CY
    Hsiao, CH
    Chiu, HC
    DERMATOLOGY, 2003, 206 (04) : 334 - 337
  • [5] KAPOSIFORM HEMANGIOENDOTHELIOMA AND TUFTED ANGIOMA: SUCCESSFUL TREATMENT WITH A NATIONAL THERAPEUTIC GUIDELINE
    Lopez Almaraz, R.
    Lopez Gutierrez, J. C.
    Ramirez Villar, G. L.
    Fernandez Pineda, I.
    Perez Alonso, V.
    Arnaiz Pena, S.
    Escobosa Sanchez, O.
    Fernandez-Delgado Cerda, R.
    Lillo Lillo, M.
    Martinez Mechon, T.
    Fuster Soler, J. L.
    Mateos Gonzalez, M. E.
    PEDIATRIC BLOOD & CANCER, 2013, 60 : 9 - 9
  • [6] Sirolimus as initial therapy for kaposiform hemangioendothelioma and tufted angioma
    Wang, Huaijie
    Guo, Xinkui
    Duan, Yitao
    Zheng, Baijun
    Gao, Ya
    PEDIATRIC DERMATOLOGY, 2018, 35 (05) : 635 - 638
  • [7] EXPRESSION OF PROX1 IN KAPOSIFORM HEMANGIOENDOTHELIOMA AND TUFTED ANGIOMA
    Dadras, S.
    North, P.
    le Huu, A. Rimella
    JOURNAL OF CUTANEOUS PATHOLOGY, 2009, 36 (01) : 111 - 111
  • [8] Kaposiform hemangioendothelioma and tufted angioma: two entities of the same clinicopathological spectrum
    Nieto-Benito, Lula Maria
    Huerta-Aragones, Jorge
    Parra-Blanco, Veronica
    Campos-Dominguez, Minia
    ANAIS BRASILEIROS DE DERMATOLOGIA, 2023, 98 (03) : 391 - 394
  • [9] Ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging features of kaposiform hemangioendothelioma and tufted angioma
    Gong, Xia
    Ying, Hanru
    Zhang, Zimin
    Wang, Lizhen
    Li, Jia
    Ding, Angang
    Zhou, Lu
    Lin, Xiaoxi
    Xiong, Ping
    JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2019, 46 (10): : 835 - 842
  • [10] Clinical features and management of kaposiform hemangioendothelioma and tufted angioma: Similarities and differences
    Zhou, Jiangyuan
    Yang, Kaiying
    Dai, Shiyi
    Qiu, Tong
    Zhang, Xuepeng
    Gong, Xue
    Chen, Siyuan
    Ji, Yi
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 2022, 87 (01) : 172 - 174