Organizations towards the Evaluation of Environmental Management Tools ISO 14001 and EMAS

被引:9
|
作者
Ociepa-Kubicka, Agnieszka [1 ]
Deska, Iwona [2 ]
Ociepa, Ewa [2 ]
机构
[1] Czestochowa Tech Univ, Fac Management, Armii Krajowej 19 B, PL-42218 Czestochowa, Poland
[2] Czestochowa Tech Univ, Fac Infrastruct & Environm, Brzeznicka 60 A, PL-42215 Czestochowa, Poland
关键词
environmental management system; eco-management and audit scheme; EMAS; ISO; 14001; organization; management; environmental protection; sustainable development; ECO-MANAGEMENT; AUDIT SCHEME; SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; SYSTEMS; CERTIFICATION; PERFORMANCE; COMPANIES; BENEFITS; QUALITY; FIRMS;
D O I
10.3390/en14164870
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The purpose of this article is to analyze and compare the benefits of and barriers to the implementation of Environmental Management Systems (EMS)-International Standard ISO 14001 and Eco-Management and Audit Scheme (EMAS)-by organizations. This paper attempts to answer the following research questions: 1. Does the implementation of either ISO 14001 or EMAS bring the same benefits and barriers to organizations? 2. Does the system functioning duration in the company influence internal and external benefits resulting from EMS implementation? 3. Are economic aspects of EMS adoption as important for entrepreneurs as the ecological aspects? This topic is important due to the large disproportions appearing in recent years between the number of companies registered in ISO 14001 and in EMAS, and due to relatively frequent cases of non-renewal of EMAS certifications in recent years. It is crucial because each EMS certified institution has implemented procedures which contribute to better protection of the natural environment. The study was conducted in the form of a survey; questions and answers were specified based on the literature review and the authors' research. Results indicate that the knowledge-based and organizational problems, as well as the time invested in preparing the documentation, are much more significant than financial problems associated with EMS implementation. Even organizations that previously introduced ISO 14001 still have difficulties with EMAS implementation. The perception of benefits resulting from EMS introduction is related to the system functioning duration in the company. The analysis shows that it is necessary to strengthen economic incentives in order to enable the widest possible dissemination of EMS among companies. Research results can contribute to further simplification and increases in EMS implementation, which may lead to more sustainable development and climate change mitigation, inter alia, due to the improvement in energy efficiency, increased use of renewable energy, and reduction of greenhouse gas emissions.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Contribution to Energy Management of the Main Standards for Environmental Management Systems: The Case of ISO 14001 and EMAS
    Laskurain, Iker
    Ibarloza, Ander
    Larrea, Ainara
    Allur, Erlantz
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2017, 10 (11)
  • [2] ISO 14001, EMAS and environmental performance: A meta-analysis
    Erauskin-Tolosa, Artitzar
    Zubeltzu-Jaka, Eugenio
    Heras-Saizarbitoria, Inaki
    Boiral, Olivier
    [J]. BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 29 (03) : 1145 - 1159
  • [3] EMAS and ISO 14001: the differences in effectively improving environmental performance
    Testa, Francesco
    Rizzi, Francesco
    Daddi, Tiberio
    Gusmerotti, Natalia Marzia
    Frey, Marco
    Iraldo, Fabio
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2014, 68 : 165 - 173
  • [4] 从ISO 14001到EMAS
    徐新宇
    王文
    [J]. 标准科学, 2014, (07) : 61 - 63
  • [5] A comprehensive approach towards product and organisation related Environmental Management tools: Life Cycle Assessment (iso 14040) and environmental management systems (iso 14001)
    Finkbeiner M.
    Wiedemann M.
    Saur K.
    [J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 1998, 3 (3) : 169 - 178
  • [6] Competing environmental management standards: how ISO 14001 outnumbered EMAS in Germany, the UK, France, and Sweden
    Bracke, Roeland
    Albrecht, Johan
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING C-GOVERNMENT AND POLICY, 2007, 25 (04): : 611 - 627
  • [7] Contribution of Life Cycle Knowledge towards Environmental Performance of ISO 14001 Certified Malaysian Companies: Analysis of ISO 14001 and Selected Life Cycle Management Tools
    Rajendran, Natasha Ashvinee
    Jimi, Quiena Lia Anak
    Sharaai, Amir Hamzah
    [J]. PERTANIKA JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE AND HUMANITIES, 2021, 29 (04): : 2189 - 2205
  • [8] ISO 14001, EMAS close to tying the knot
    Roberts, M
    [J]. CHEMICAL WEEK, 1996, 158 (11) : 26 - 26
  • [9] The Adoption of Environmental Management Systems Based on ISO 14001, EMAS, and Alternative Models for SMEs: A Qualitative Empirical Study
    Diaz de Junguitu, Alberto
    Allur, Erlantz
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (24)
  • [10] Towards implementation of ISO 14001 environmental management systems in selected industries in China
    Zeng, SX
    Tam, CM
    Tam, VWY
    Deng, ZM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2005, 13 (07) : 645 - 656