Influence of transfer-in rates on quality of care and outcomes at receiving hospitals in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

被引:7
|
作者
Mehta, Rajendra H. [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Anita Y. [1 ,2 ]
Ohman, E. Magnus [1 ,2 ]
Gibler, W. Brian [3 ]
Peterson, Eric D. [1 ,2 ]
Roe, Matthew T. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Duke Clin Res Inst, Durham, NC 27715 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Durham, NC USA
[3] Univ Cincinnati, Coll Med, Cincinnati, OH USA
关键词
ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROMES; FIBRINOLYTIC THERAPY; INVASIVE MANAGEMENT; ANGIOPLASTY; STRATEGIES; COMMUNITY; DISEASE; VOLUME; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.ahj.2010.06.025
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) are frequently transferred to tertiary hospitals for angiography and/or revascularization from hospitals lacking such capabilities. Given that patients who undergo invasive cardiac procedures are younger and have fewer comorbidities compared with those managed medically, the relative proportion of transfer-in patients at tertiary hospitals may influence comparisons of quality and guidelines adherence. Methods We evaluated 142,092 NSTEMI patients treated at 396 revascularization-capable sites in the CRUSADE National Quality Improvement Initiative from 2001 to 2006. Transfer-in patients were included if they arrived at the receiving hospital after their first presentation to a different hospital. Hospitals were categorized into tertiles based upon their transfer-in rates (low, intermediate, and high) and adherence to practice guidelines recommendations for NSTEMI. In-hospital clinical outcomes were compared across hospital tertiles. Results Acute and discharge composite guidelines adherence scores improved at hospitals with an increasing proportion of transfer-in patients, both for transferred as well as for directly admitted patients. These better adherence scores were inversely associated with overall mortality, with the lowest mortality observed in patients at hospitals with the highest transfer-in rates. However, once adjusted for baseline confounders, the mortality rates for patients in the hospitals in the highest transfer-in tertile did not differ significantly compared with the sites in the lowest transfer-in tertile (odds ratio 1.02, 95% CI 0.90-1.16). Conclusions Our findings show that the proportion of NSTEMI patients transferred into revascularization-capable hospitals varies significantly. Hospitals with a higher proportion of transfer-in patients tend to provide higher overall quality of NSTE acute coronary syndrome care; they also have lower overall in-hospital mortality, which may, in part, be related to the lower-risk baseline characteristics of patients at these hospitals. (Am Heart J 2010;160:405-11.)
引用
收藏
页码:405 / 411
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Influence of Transfer-In Rates on Quality of Care and Outcomes at Receiving Hospitals in Patients With Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes
    Mehta, Rajendra H.
    Chen, Anita Y.
    Peterson, Eric D.
    Roe, Matthew T.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2009, 53 (10) : A367 - A367
  • [2] Limitations of using cardiac catheterization rates to assess the quality of care for patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
    Leonardi, Sergio
    Chen, Anita Y.
    Gharacholou, S. Michael
    Wang, Tracy Y.
    de Lemos, James A.
    Saucedo, Jorge F.
    Peterson, Eric D.
    Roe, Matthew T.
    [J]. AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2012, 164 (04) : 502 - 508
  • [3] Quality of care by classification of myocardial infarction - Treatment patterns for ST-segment elevation vs non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
    Roe, MT
    Parsons, LS
    Pollack, CV
    Canto, JG
    Barron, HV
    Every, NR
    Rogers, WJ
    Peterson, ED
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2005, 165 (14) : 1630 - 1636
  • [4] Day 1 care in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
    Thomas, Deepak
    Giugliano, Robert P.
    [J]. CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE, 2010, 11 (01) : 41 - 51
  • [5] Influence of Presenting Electrocardiographic Findings on the Treatment and Outcomes of Patients With Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
    Patel, Jigar H.
    Gupta, Raghav
    Roe, Matthew T.
    Peng, S. Andrew
    Wiviott, Stephen D.
    Saucedo, Jorge F.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 113 (02): : 256 - 261
  • [6] Trends in outcomes among older patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
    Chin, Chee Tang
    Wang, Tracy Y.
    Chen, Anita Y.
    Mathews, Robin
    Alexander, Karen P.
    Roe, Matthew T.
    Peterson, Eric D.
    [J]. AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2014, 167 (01) : 36 - +
  • [7] Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Delayed Hospitalization for Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
    Cha, Jung-Joon
    Bae, SungA
    Park, Duk-Woo
    Park, Jae Hyoung
    Hong, Soon Jun
    Park, Seong-Mi
    Yu, Cheol Woong
    Rha, Seung-Woon
    Lim, Do-Sun
    Suh, Soon Yong
    Han, Seung Hwan
    Woo, Seong-Ill
    Lee, Nae-Hee
    Choi, Donghoon
    Chae, In-Ho
    Kim, Hyo-Soo
    Hong, Young Joon
    Ahn, Youngkeun
    Jeong, Myung Ho
    Ahn, Tae Hoon
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2022, 79 (04) : 311 - 323
  • [8] Impact of ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Regionalization Programs on the Treatment and Outcomes of Patients Diagnosed With Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
    Montoy, Juan Carlos C.
    Shen, Yu-Chu
    Brindis, Ralph G.
    Krumholz, Harlan M.
    Hsia, Renee Y.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, 2021, 10 (03): : 1 - 15
  • [9] Management of non-ST-Segment elevation myocardial infarction
    Van Horn, Stephen E.
    Maniu, Calin V.
    [J]. MEDICAL CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2007, 91 (04) : 683 - +
  • [10] Is The Diagnosis ST-Segment Elevation or Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction?
    Tsutsumi, Katsuhiko
    Tsukahara, Kengo
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2018, 138 (23) : 2715 - 2717