Coseismic slip of the 2010 Mw 8.8 Great Maule, Chile, earthquake quantified by the inversion of GRACE observations

被引:48
|
作者
Wang, Lei [1 ]
Shum, C. K. [1 ]
Simons, Frederik J. [2 ]
Tassara, Andres [3 ]
Erkan, Kamil [1 ]
Jekeli, Christopher [1 ]
Braun, Alexander [4 ]
Kuo, Chungyen [5 ]
Lee, Hyongki [6 ]
Yuan, Dah-Ning [7 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Sch Earth Sci, Div Geodet Sci, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] Princeton Univ, Dept Geosci, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
[3] Univ Concepcion, Dept Ciencias Tierra, Concepcion, Chile
[4] Univ Texas Dallas, Dept Geosci, Richardson, TX 75083 USA
[5] Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Dept Geomat, Tainan 70101, Taiwan
[6] Univ Houston, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Houston, TX 77204 USA
[7] CALTECH, Jet Prop Lab, Pasadena, CA 91125 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Maule earthquake; Geodynamics; GRACE; INTERSEISMIC STRAIN ACCUMULATION; SUMATRA-ANDAMAN EARTHQUAKE; SEISMIC GAP; SOUTH-AMERICA; GRAVITY; GPS; OPTIMIZATION; VARIABILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.epsl.2012.04.044
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
The 27 February 2010 Mw 8.8 Maule, Chile, earthquake ruptured over 500 km along a mature seismic gap between 34 degrees S and 38 degrees S-the Concepcion-Constitucion gap, where no large megathrust earthquakes had occurred since the 1835 Mw similar to 8.5 event. Notable discrepancies exist in slip distribution and moment magnitude estimated by various models inverted using traditional observations such as teleseismic networks, coastal/river markers, tsunami sensors, Global Positioning System (GPS) and Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR). We conduct a spatio-spectral localization analysis, based on Slepian basis functions, of data from Gravity Recovery And Climate Experiment (GRACE) to extract coseismic gravity change signals of the Maule earthquake with improved spatial resolution (350 km half-wavelength). Our results reveal discernible differences in the average slip between the GRACE observation and predictions from various coseismic models. The sensitivity analysis reveals that GRACE observation is sensitive to the size of the fault, but unable to separate depth and slip. Here we assume the depth of the fault is known, and simultaneously invert for the fault-plane area and the average slip using the simulated annealing algorithm. Our GRACE-inverted fault plane length and width are 429 +/- 6 km, 146 +/- 5 km, respectively. The estimated slip is 8.1 +/- 1.2 m, indicating that most of the strain accumulated since 1835 in the Concepcion-Constitucion gap was released by the 2010 Maule earthquake. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:167 / 179
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Coseismic slip distribution of the February 27, 2010 Mw 8.8 Maule, Chile earthquake
    Pollitz, Fred F.
    Brooks, Ben
    Tong, Xiaopeng
    Bevis, Michael G.
    Foster, James H.
    Buergmann, Roland
    Smalley, Robert, Jr.
    Vigny, Christophe
    Socquet, Anne
    Ruegg, Jean-Claude
    Campos, Jaime
    Barrientos, Sergio
    Parra, Hector
    Baez Soto, Juan Carlos
    Cimbaro, Sergio
    Blanco, Mauro
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2011, 38
  • [2] Splay fault slip during the Mw 8.8 2010 Maule Chile earthquake
    Melnick, Daniel
    Moreno, Marcos
    Motagh, Mahdi
    Cisternas, Marco
    Wesson, Robert L.
    [J]. GEOLOGY, 2012, 40 (03) : 251 - 254
  • [3] On the relationship between structure, morphology and large coseismic slip: A case study of the Mw 8.8 Maule, Chile 2010 earthquake
    Contreras-Reyes, Eduardo
    Maksymowicz, Andrei
    Lange, Dietrich
    Grevemeyer, Ingo
    Munoz-Linford, Pamela
    Moscoso, Eduardo
    [J]. EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS, 2017, 478 : 27 - 39
  • [4] Splay fault slip during the Mw 8.8 2010 Maule Chile earthquake Comment
    Allmendinger, Richard W.
    Gonzalez, Gabriel
    Cembrano, Jose
    Aron, Felipe
    Yanez, Gonzalo
    [J]. GEOLOGY, 2013, 41 (12) : E309 - E309
  • [5] Splay fault slip during the Mw 8.8 2010 Maule Chile earthquake Reply
    Melnick, Daniel
    Moreno, Marcos
    Motagh, Mahdi
    Cisternas, Marco
    Wesson, Robert L.
    [J]. GEOLOGY, 2013, 41 (12) : E310 - E310
  • [6] Estimating coseismic coastal uplift with an intertidal mussel: calibration for the 2010 Maule Chile earthquake (Mw=8.8)
    Melnick, Daniel
    Cisternas, Marco
    Moreno, Marcos
    Norambuena, Ricardo
    [J]. QUATERNARY SCIENCE REVIEWS, 2012, 42 : 29 - 42
  • [7] Coseismic slip distribution of the February 27, 2010 Mw 8.8 Maule, Chile earthquake (vol 38, L09309, 2011)
    Pollitz, Fred F.
    Brooks, Ben
    Tong, Xiaopeng
    Bevis, Michael G.
    Foster, James H.
    Buergmann, Roland
    Smalley, Robert, Jr.
    Vigny, Christophe
    Socquet, Anne
    Ruegg, Jean-Claude
    Campos, Jaime
    Barrientos, Sergio
    Parra, Hector
    Soto, Juan Carlos Baez
    Cimbaro, Sergio
    Blanco, Mauro
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2011, 38
  • [8] Impact of ionosphere on InSAR observation and coseismic slip inversion: Improved slip model for the 2010 Maule, Chile, earthquake
    Zhang, Bochen
    Ding, Xiaoli
    Amelung, Falk
    Wang, Chisheng
    Xu, Wenbin
    Zhu, Wu
    Shimada, Masanobu
    Zhang, Qingjun
    Baba, Toshitaka
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 267
  • [9] Triggering of tremors and slow slip event in Guerrero, Mexico, by the 2010 Mw 8.8 Maule, Chile, earthquake
    Zigone, Dimitri
    Rivet, Diane
    Radiguet, Mathilde
    Campillo, Michel
    Voisin, Christophe
    Cotte, Nathalie
    Walpersdorf, Andrea
    Shapiro, Nikolai M.
    Cougoulat, Glenn
    Roux, Philippe
    Kostoglodov, Vladimir
    Husker, Allen
    Payero, Juan S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH, 2012, 117
  • [10] Deep mass redistribution prior to the 2010 Mw 8.8 Maule (Chile) Earthquake revealed by GRACE satellite gravity
    Bouih, Marie
    Panet, Isabelle
    Remy, Dominique
    Longuevergne, Laurent
    Bonvalot, Sylvain
    [J]. EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS, 2022, 584