Minimally invasive oesophagectomy: current status and future direction

被引:33
|
作者
Butler, Nick [1 ]
Collins, Stuart [1 ]
Memon, Breda [1 ]
Memon, Muhammed Ashraf [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Ipswich Hosp, Dept Surg, Ipswich, Qld, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, Dept Surg, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[3] Bond Univ, Fac Hlth Sci & Med, Gold Coast, Qld, Australia
[4] Bolton Univ, Fac Hlth & Social Sci, Bolton, Lancs, England
关键词
Oesophagectomy; Laparoscopy; Oesophageal cancer; Retrospective studies; Prospective studies; Comparative studies; Patient outcome; Intraoperative complications; Postoperative complications; Hospitalisation; Human; LAPAROSCOPIC TRANSHIATAL ESOPHAGECTOMY; THORACOSCOPIC ESOPHAGECTOMY; INTRATHORACIC ANASTOMOSIS; CERVICAL ACCESS; PRONE POSITION; CANCER; EXPERIENCE; OUTCOMES; MOBILIZATION; ESOPHAGUS;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-010-1511-2
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Oesophagectomy is one of the most challenging surgeries. Potential for morbidity and mortality is high. Minimally invasive techniques have been introduced in an attempt to reduce postoperative complications and recovery times. Debate continues over whether these techniques are beneficial to morbidity and whether oncological resection is compromised. This review article will analyse the different techniques employed in minimally invasive oesophagectomy (MIO) and critically evaluate commonly reported outcome measures from the available literature. Methods Medline, Embase, Science Citation Index, Current Contents, and PubMed databases were used to search English language articles published on MIO. Thirty-one articles underwent thorough analysis and the data were tabulated where appropriate. To date, only level III evidence exists. Where appropriate, comparisons are made with a meta-analysis on open oesophagectomy. Results Positive aspects of MIO include at least comparable postoperative recovery data and oncological resection measures to open surgery. Intensive care unit requirements are lower, as is duration of inpatient stay. Respiratory morbidity varies. Negative aspects include increased technical skill of the surgeon and increased equipment requirements, increased operative time and limitation with respect to local advancement of cancer. With increasing individual experience, improvements in outcome measures and the amenability of this approach to increasing neoplastic advancement has been shown. Conclusion MIO has outcome measures at least as comparable to open oesophagectomy in the setting of benign and nonlocally advanced cancer. Transthoracic oesophagectomy provides superior exposure to the thoracic oesophagus compared to the transhiatal approach and is currently preferred. No multicentre randomised controlled trials exist or are likely to come into fruition. As with all surgery, careful patient selection is required for optimal results from MIO.
引用
收藏
页码:2071 / 2083
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Minimally invasive oesophagectomy: current status and future direction
    Nick Butler
    Stuart Collins
    Breda Memon
    Muhammed Ashraf Memon
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2011, 25 : 2071 - 2083
  • [2] Reply to: a letter to the editors: Re: minimally invasive oesophagectomy: current status and future direction
    Muhammed Ashraf Memon
    Nick Butler
    Stuart Collins
    Breda Memon
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2012, 26 : 2697 - 2697
  • [3] Reply to: a letter to the editors: Re: minimally invasive oesophagectomy: current status and future direction
    Memon, Muhammed Ashraf
    Butler, Nick
    Collins, Stuart
    Memon, Breda
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2012, 26 (09): : 2697 - 2697
  • [4] Minimally invasive esophagectomy: current status and future direction
    Maas, Kirsten
    Biere, Surya
    Van der Peet, Donald
    Cuesta, Miguel
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2012, 26 (06): : 1794 - 1794
  • [5] Minimally invasive esophagectomy: current status and future direction
    Kirsten Maas
    Surya Biere
    Donald Van der Peet
    Miguel Cuesta
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2012, 26 : 1794 - 1794
  • [6] Minimally invasive glaucoma surgery: current status and future prospects
    Richter, Grace M.
    Coleman, Anne L.
    CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2016, 10 : 189 - 206
  • [7] Minimally invasive photoacoustic imaging: Current status and future perspectives
    Zhao, Tianrui
    Desjardins, Adrien E.
    Ourselin, Sebastien
    Vercauteren, Tom
    Xia, Wenfeng
    PHOTOACOUSTICS, 2019, 16
  • [8] Minimally invasive central pancreatectomy: current status and future directions
    Kang, Chang Moo
    Lee, Jin Ho
    Lee, Woo Jung
    JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES, 2014, 21 (12) : 831 - 840
  • [9] Current status and future directions of minimally invasive cardiac surgery
    Goldstein, DJ
    Oz, MC
    CURRENT OPINION IN CARDIOLOGY, 1999, 14 (05) : 419 - 425
  • [10] Minimally invasive oesophagectomy in Wales
    Chan, David S. Y.
    Baker, Andrew L.
    SURGEON-JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL COLLEGES OF SURGEONS OF EDINBURGH AND IRELAND, 2016, 14 (04): : 196 - 201