Does pension privatization increase economic growth? Evidence from Latin America and Eastern Europe

被引:12
|
作者
Altiparmakov, Nikola [1 ]
Nedeljkovic, Milan [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Fiscal Council, Belgrade, Serbia
[2] Natl Bank Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia
[3] Singidunum Univ, Fac Econ Finance & Adm, Belgrade, Serbia
[4] CESIfo Network, Poschinger St 5, D-81679 Munich, Germany
来源
关键词
Pension funding; economic growth; national saving; emerging economies; PANEL-DATA; REFORM; LESSONS; MODELS; FUNDS;
D O I
10.1017/S1474747216000160
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Analyses of pension funding effects on economic growth should differentiate between carve-out' pension privatization in Latin America and Eastern Europe and typical add-on' pension funding in Western Europe and North America. We find no evidence that pension privatization in Latin America and Eastern Europe was associated with higher economic growth. The result is robust across both continents and several alternative econometric specifications. Positive growth effects are particularly unlikely in countries resorting to debt-financed privatization. Furthermore, we note the lack of positive pension privatization effects on savings in Eastern Europe, with limited evidence of positive savings effects in Latin America. These findings suggest that cost-containment parametric reforms should be given priority over carve-out pension privatization when considering options for restoring financial sustainability of public Pay-As-You-Go systems.
引用
收藏
页码:46 / 84
页数:39
相关论文
共 50 条