Martian electron density profiles retrieved from Mars Express dual-frequency radio occultation measurements

被引:10
|
作者
Zhang, S. J. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Cui, J. [2 ]
Guo, P. [1 ]
Li, J. L. [1 ]
Ping, J. S. [2 ]
Jian, N. C. [1 ]
Zhang, K. F. [5 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Shanghai Astron Observ, Shanghai 200030, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Natl Astron Observ, Beijing 100012, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Sci, Key Lab Planetary Sci, Shanghai 200030, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
[5] RMIT Univ, Melbourne, Vic 3001, Australia
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Martian ionosphere; Radio occultation; Inversion; Differential Doppler; SCIENCE OBSERVATIONS; DOPPLER TRACKING; RADAR SOUNDINGS; GLOBAL SURVEYOR; IONOSPHERE; ATMOSPHERE; TOPOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.1016/j.asr.2015.01.030
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
The S- and X-band dual-frequency Doppler radio occultation observations obtained by the Mars Express Radio Science (MaRS) experiments are reduced in this study. A total of 414 Martian electron density profiles are retrieved covering the period from DOY 93 2004 to DOY 304 2012. These observations are well distributed over both longitude and latitude, with Sun-Mars distance varying from 1.38 AU to 1.67 AU, the solar zenith angle (SZA) ranging from 52 degrees to 122 degrees. Due to the improved vertical resolution for the MaRS experiments, the vertical structures of the retrieved profiles appear to be more complicated than those revealed by early radio occultation experiments. Dayside electron density profiles have primary peaks (M2) typically around 130 km and secondary peaks (M1) around 110 km. Nightside electron density profiles are highly variable, many of which do not have double layer structures. Both the dayside and nightside electron density profiles reveal some atypical features such as topside layering above M2 and bottom-side layering below M1. The former likely represent the plasma fluctuations in response to the solar wind (SW) interactions with the Martian ionosphere, whereas the latter is thought to be induced by the meteoric influx. We fit the peak electron density of profiles up to terminator with a simple power relation (N-m = N-0/ch(k)(x)) with the best-fit subsolar peak electron density being N-0 = (1.499 +/- 0.002) x 10(5) cm(-3), and the best-fit power index being k = 0.513 +/- 0.001. The measured total electron content (TEC) is obtained by integrating the observed electron density profile vertically from 50 km to 400 km, which is then compared with the ideal TEC computed from the one-layer Chapman model. We find that the one-layer Chapman model can generally underestimate the measured TEC up to similar to 0.1 TECU (1 TECU = 1.0 x 10(16) m(-2)) for 55 degrees < SZA < 90 degrees and up to similar to 0.05 TECU for 90 degrees < SZA < 120 degrees. The dayside TEC (SZA <= 75 degrees) varies from 0.1 to 0.6 TECU, whereas the nightside TEC (SZA >= 105 degrees) is usually below 0.2 TECU. Several large TEC values can be found in the terminator region. The corresponding slab thickness varies from 40 km-60 km for the dayside and 40 km-140 km for the nightside, with an average value of 61 km. (C) 2015 COSPAR. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2177 / 2189
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Error analysis of Abel retrieved electron density profiles from radio occultation measurements
    Yue, X.
    Schreiner, W. S.
    Lei, J.
    Sokolovskiy, S. V.
    Rocken, C.
    Hunt, D. C.
    Kuo, Y. -H.
    [J]. ANNALES GEOPHYSICAE, 2010, 28 (01) : 217 - 222
  • [2] The structure of Mars lower atmosphere from Mars Express Radio Science (MaRS) occultation measurements
    Tellmann, Silvia
    Paetzold, Martin
    Haeusler, Bernd
    Hinson, D. P.
    Tyler, G. Leonard
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-PLANETS, 2013, 118 (02) : 306 - 320
  • [3] A noise-aware combination of dual-frequency measurements from GPS radio occultation
    Wee, Tae-Kwon
    Kuo, Ying-Hwa
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2013, 118 (23) : 12852 - 12868
  • [4] Data assimilation retrieval of electron density profiles from radio occultation measurements
    Yue, Xinan
    Schreiner, William S.
    Lin, Yu-Cheng
    Rocken, Christian
    Kuo, Ying-Hwa
    Zhao, Biqiang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2011, 116
  • [5] Recovery and Validation of Mars Ionospheric Electron Density Profiles from Viking Orbiter Radio Occultation Observations
    Withers, Paul
    Felici, Marianna
    Flynn, Casey
    Vogt, Marissa F.
    [J]. PLANETARY SCIENCE JOURNAL, 2020, 1 (01):
  • [6] Variation of the Martian ionospheric electron density from Mars Express radar soundings
    Morgan, D. D.
    Gurnett, D. A.
    Kirchner, D. L.
    Fox, J. L.
    Nielsen, E.
    Plaut, J. J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2008, 113 (A9)
  • [7] Longitudinal behaviors of the IRI-B parameters of the equatorial electron density profiles retrieved from FORMOSAT-3/COSMIC radio occultation measurements
    Liu, Libo
    Wan, Weixing
    Ning, Baiqi
    Zhang, Man-Lian
    He, Maosheng
    Yue, Xinan
    [J]. ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH, 2010, 46 (08) : 1064 - 1069
  • [8] COMPARISON OF RAINFALL PROFILES RETRIEVED FROM DUAL-FREQUENCY RADAR AND FROM COMBINED RADAR AND PASSIVE MICROWAVE RADIOMETRIC MEASUREMENTS
    WEINMAN, JA
    MENEGHINI, R
    NAKAMURA, K
    [J]. FOURTH CONFERENCE ON SATELLITE METEOROLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY, 1989, : 27 - 30
  • [9] Retrieval of ionospheric profiles from the Mars Express MARSIS experiment data and comparison with radio occultation data
    Sanchez-Cano, B.
    Witasse, O.
    Herraiz, M.
    Radicella, S. M.
    Bauer, J.
    Blelly, P. -L.
    Rodriguez-Caderot, G.
    [J]. GEOSCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTATION METHODS AND DATA SYSTEMS, 2012, 1 (01) : 77 - 84
  • [10] Ganymede's Ionosphere Observed by a Dual-Frequency Radio Occultation With Juno
    Buccino, D. R.
    Parisi, M.
    Gramigna, E.
    Gomez-Casajus, L.
    Tortora, P.
    Zannoni, M.
    Caruso, A.
    Park, R. S.
    Withers, P.
    Steffes, P.
    Hodges, A.
    Levin, S.
    Bolton, S.
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2022, 49 (23)