Crowding is the strongest predictor of left without being seen risk in a pediatric emergency department

被引:10
|
作者
Gorski, Jillian K. [1 ]
Arnold, Tyler S. [1 ,2 ]
Usiak, Holly [2 ]
Showalter, Cory D. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ Sch Med, Dept Pediat, 705 Riley Hosp Dr, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[2] Indiana Univ Sch Med, Dept Emergency Med, 720 Eskenazi Ave,Fifth Third Bank Bldg,3rd Floor, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
来源
关键词
Overcrowding; Left without being seen; Pediatric emergency medicine; Operations research; LEAVE; OUTCOMES; CHILDREN; PATIENT; CARE; CONSEQUENCES; PHYSICIAN; IMPACT; TIMES; WAIT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajem.2021.04.005
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: Emergency Department (ED) patients who leave without being seen (LWBS) are associated with adverse safety and medico-legal consequences. While LWBS risk has been previously tied to demographic and acuity related factors, there is limited research examining crowding-related risk in the pediatric setting. The primary objective of this study was to determine the association between LWBS risk and crowding, using the National Emergency Department Overcrowding Score (NEDOCS) and occupancy rate as crowding metrics. Methods: We performed a retrospective observational study on electronic health record (EHR) data from the ED of a quaternary care children's hospital and trauma center during the 14-month study period. NEDOCS and occupancy rate were calculated for 15-min windows and matched to patient arrival time. We leveraged multiple logistic regression analyses to demonstrate the relationship between patientlevel LWBS risk and each crowding metric, controlling for characteristics drawn from the pre-arrival state. We performed a chi-squared test to determine whether a difference existed between the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves in the two models. Finally, we executed a dominance analysis using McFadden's pseudo-R 2 to determine the relative importance of each crowding metric in the models. Results: A total of 54,890 patient encounters were studied, 1.22% of whom LWBS. The odds ratio for LWBS risk was 1.30 (95% CI 1.27-1.33) per 10-point increase in NEDOCS and 1.23 (95% CI 1.21-1.25). per 10% increase in occupancy rate. Area under the curve (AUC) was 86.9% for the NEDOCS model and 86.7% for the occupancy rate model. There was no statistically significant difference between the AUCs of the two models (p-value 0.27). Dominance analysis revealed that in each model, the most important variable studied was its respective crowding metric; NEDOCS accounted for 55.6% and occupancy rate accounted for 53.9% of predicted variance in LWBS. Conclusion: Not only was ED overcrowding positively and significantly associated with individual LWBS risk, but it was the single most important factor that determined a patient's likelihood of LWBS in the pediatric ED. Because occupancy rate and NEDOCS are available in real time, each could serve as a monitor for individual LWBS risk in the pediatric ED. (c) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:73 / 78
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Crowding is the Strongest Predictor of Left Without Being Seen Risk in a Pediatric Emergency Department
    Gorski, J. K.
    Arnold, T. S.
    Usiak, H.
    Showalter, C. D.
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2020, 76 (04) : S145 - S145
  • [2] The left-without-being-seen rate: An imperfect measure of emergency department crowding
    Pines, Jesse M.
    [J]. ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2006, 13 (07) : 807 - 807
  • [3] Hospital Determinants of Emergency Department Left Without Being Seen Rates
    Hsia, Renee Y.
    Asch, Steven M.
    Weiss, Robert E.
    Zingmond, David
    Liang, Li-Jung
    Han, Weijuan
    McCreath, Heather
    Sun, Benjamin C.
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2011, 58 (01) : 24 - 32
  • [4] Pediatric Left-Without-Being-Seen Patients What Happens to Them After They Leave the Pediatric Emergency Department?
    Tothy, Alison S.
    Staley, Shannon
    Dean, Elena K.
    Johnson, Sameka
    Johnson, Daniel
    [J]. PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY CARE, 2013, 29 (11) : 1194 - 1196
  • [5] 'Swab and Go' impact on emergency department left without being seen rates
    Yoo, Michael J.
    Schauer, Steven G.
    Trueblood, Wesley E.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2022, 57 : 164 - 165
  • [6] Leaving Without Being Seen From the Pediatric Emergency Department: A New Baseline
    Kappy, Brandon
    Mckinley, Kenneth
    Chamberlain, James
    Badolato, Gia M.
    Podolsky, Robert H.
    Bond, Gregory
    Schultz, Theresa Ryan
    Isbey, Sarah
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2023, 65 (03): : e237 - e249
  • [7] The Impact of Behavioral Health Patients on a Pediatric Emergency Department's Length of Stay and Left Without Being Seen
    Conrad, Heather B.
    Hollenbach, Kathryn A.
    Gehlbach, Daniel L.
    Ferran, Karen L.
    Barham, Tiffani A.
    Carstairs, Keri L.
    [J]. PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY CARE, 2018, 34 (08) : 584 - 587
  • [8] Comparison of the Demographics and Visit Characteristics of Patients Who Left the Pediatric Emergency Department Without Being Seen With Those Who Were Evaluated in the Emergency Department
    Suastegui, Charles
    Lozano, Juan M.
    Maniaci, Vincenzo M.
    Linares, Marc Yves-Rene
    [J]. PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY CARE, 2021, 37 (06) : E329 - E333
  • [9] Left without being seen in a hybrid point of service collection model emergency department
    Hitti, Eveline
    Hadid, Dima
    Tamim, Hani
    Al Hariri, Moustafa
    El Sayed, Mazen
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2020, 38 (03): : 497 - 502
  • [10] Characteristics and retention of emergency department patients who left without being seen (LWBS)
    Roby, Nathan
    Smith, Hayden
    Hurdelbrink, Jonathan
    Craig, Steven
    Hawthorne, Clint
    DuMontier, Samuel
    Kluesner, Nicholas
    [J]. INTERNAL AND EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2022, 17 (02) : 551 - 558