Golem: an algorithm for robust experiment and process optimization

被引:22
|
作者
Aldeghi, Matteo [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Hase, Florian [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Hickman, Riley J. [2 ,3 ]
Tamblyn, Isaac [1 ,5 ]
Aspuru-Guzik, Alan [1 ,2 ,3 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Vector Inst Artificial Intelligence, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Dept Chem, Chem Phys Theory Grp, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Dept Comp Sci, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Harvard Univ, Dept Chem & Chem Biol, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[5] Natl Res Council Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[6] Canadian Inst Adv Res, Toronto, ON, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
GENETIC ALGORITHMS;
D O I
10.1039/d1sc01545a
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Numerous challenges in science and engineering can be framed as optimization tasks, including the maximization of reaction yields, the optimization of molecular and materials properties, and the fine-tuning of automated hardware protocols. Design of experiment and optimization algorithms are often adopted to solve these tasks efficiently. Increasingly, these experiment planning strategies are coupled with automated hardware to enable autonomous experimental platforms. The vast majority of the strategies used, however, do not consider robustness against the variability of experiment and process conditions. In fact, it is generally assumed that these parameters are exact and reproducible. Yet some experiments may have considerable noise associated with some of their conditions, and process parameters optimized under precise control may be applied in the future under variable operating conditions. In either scenario, the optimal solutions found might not be robust against input variability, affecting the reproducibility of results and returning suboptimal performance in practice. Here, we introduce Golem, an algorithm that is agnostic to the choice of experiment planning strategy and that enables robust experiment and process optimization. Golem identifies optimal solutions that are robust to input uncertainty, thus ensuring the reproducible performance of optimized experimental protocols and processes. It can be used to analyze the robustness of past experiments, or to guide experiment planning algorithms toward robust solutions on the fly. We assess the performance and domain of applicability of Golem through extensive benchmark studies and demonstrate its practical relevance by optimizing an analytical chemistry protocol under the presence of significant noise in its experimental conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:14792 / 14807
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Research on robust optimization of cement calcination process based on RMODE algorithm
    Yang, Xunian
    Yang, Jieguang
    Hao, Xiaochen
    CHEMOMETRICS AND INTELLIGENT LABORATORY SYSTEMS, 2025, 261
  • [2] A robust optimization algorithm for brachytherapy
    Wang, X.
    Wang, P.
    Li, J.
    Orlandini, L. Clara
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2020, 152 : S772 - S773
  • [3] Robustness of robust process optimization
    Mevik, B.-H.
    Quality Engineering, 2001, 14 (01) : 13 - 23
  • [4] ROBUST EXPERIMENT DESIGN VIA MAXIMIN OPTIMIZATION
    PRONZATO, L
    WALTER, E
    MATHEMATICAL BIOSCIENCES, 1988, 89 (02) : 161 - 176
  • [5] Robust simplex algorithm for online optimization
    Huang, Xiaobiao
    PHYSICAL REVIEW ACCELERATORS AND BEAMS, 2018, 21 (10):
  • [6] Parallelization of a nonlinear robust optimization algorithm
    Tanyi, BA
    Rustem, B
    Darlington, J
    PARALLEL COMPUTING: FUNDAMENTALS, APPLICATIONS AND NEW DIRECTIONS, 1998, 12 : 171 - 178
  • [7] A robust genetic algorithm for structural optimization
    Chen, SY
    Rajan, SD
    STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING AND MECHANICS, 2000, 10 (04) : 313 - 336
  • [8] A robust evolutionary algorithm for global optimization
    Yang, JM
    Lin, CJ
    Kao, CY
    ENGINEERING OPTIMIZATION, 2002, 34 (05) : 405 - 425
  • [9] ITERATIVE ALGORITHM FOR ROBUST PERFORMANCE OPTIMIZATION
    GLARIA, J
    GOODWIN, G
    ROJAS, R
    SALGADO, M
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONTROL, 1993, 57 (04) : 799 - 815
  • [10] EXPERIMENT IN LINEAR OPTIMIZATION OF HOLOGRAPHIC PROCESS
    YU, FTS
    APPLIED OPTICS, 1972, 11 (04): : 949 - &