Using Conjoint Analysis and Choice Experiments to Estimate QALY Values Issues to Consider

被引:49
|
作者
Flynn, Terry N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Technol, Ctr Study Choice CenSoC, Ultimo, NSW, Australia
关键词
OLDER-PEOPLE; MODELS; HEALTH; UTILITY; CARE; WORST;
D O I
10.2165/11535660-000000000-00000
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
There is increasing interest in using ranking tasks, discrete choice experiments and best-worst sealing studies to estimate QALY values for use in cost-utility analysis. The research frontier in choice modelling is moving rapidly, with a number of issues being explored across several disciplines. These issues include the estimation of discount factors, proper modelling of the variance scale factor and the estimation of individual-level utility functions. Some of these issues are particularly acute when discrete choice tasks are used to facilitate extra-welfarist analyses that rely on population-based values. There are also potential problems in implementing such tasks that have received little interest in the non-health discrete choice literature because they are specific to the QALY framework. This article details these issues and offers recommendations on the conduct of 21st century QALY valuation exercises that propose to use any tasks that rely on discrete choices.
引用
收藏
页码:711 / 722
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Using Conjoint Analysis and Choice Experiments to Estimate QALY ValuesIssues to Consider
    Terry N. Flynn
    [J]. PharmacoEconomics, 2010, 28 : 711 - 722
  • [2] Discrete Choice Experiments Are Not Conjoint Analysis
    Louviere, Jordan J.
    Flynn, Terry N.
    Carson, Richard T.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHOICE MODELLING, 2010, 3 (03) : 57 - 72
  • [3] Response latencies in the analysis of conjoint choice experiments
    Haaijer, R
    Kamakura, W
    Wedel, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2000, 37 (03) : 376 - 382
  • [4] Conjoint Analysis and Discrete Choice Experiments for Quality Improvement
    Li, William
    Nachtsheim, Christopher J.
    Wang, Ke
    Reul, Robert
    Albrecht, Mark
    [J]. JOURNAL OF QUALITY TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 45 (01) : 74 - 99
  • [5] Designing conjoint choice experiments using managers' prior beliefs
    Sándor, Z
    Wedel, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2001, 38 (04) : 430 - 444
  • [6] Including Opt-Out Options in Discrete Choice Experiments: Issues to Consider
    Campbell, Danny
    Erdem, Seda
    [J]. PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2019, 12 (01): : 1 - 14
  • [7] Including Opt-Out Options in Discrete Choice Experiments: Issues to Consider
    Danny Campbell
    Seda Erdem
    [J]. The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 2019, 12 : 1 - 14
  • [8] Estimating nonuse values using conjoint analysis
    Turner, Robert W.
    Giuda, Alita
    Noddin, Laura
    [J]. ECONOMICS BULLETIN, 2005, 17
  • [9] Online Healthy Food Experiments: Capturing Complexity by Using Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis
    Valdimar Sigurdsson
    R. G. Vishnu Menon
    Asle Fagerstrøm
    [J]. The Behavior Analyst, 2017, 40 : 373 - 391
  • [10] Online Healthy Food Experiments: Capturing Complexity by Using Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis
    Sigurdsson, Valdimar
    Menon, R. G. Vishnu
    Fagerstrom, Asle
    [J]. BEHAVIOR ANALYST, 2017, 40 (02): : 373 - 391