Product platform design to improve commonality in custom products

被引:80
|
作者
Farrell, RS [1 ]
Simpson, TW [1 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Dept Mech & Nucl Engn, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
关键词
product families; product platforms; customization;
D O I
10.1023/A:1027306704980
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Many companies find it difficult to maintain commonality and economies of scale in products with strict customer design requirements that may vary greatly from contract-to-contract or piece-to-piece. These strict and varied requirements typically result in highly customized products that are costly to manufacture, involve small production runs, and require long delivery times. In this paper, we discuss how the strategic incorporation of product platforms into the design process can leverage the design effort of individually customized products. The example involves the design of cross-sections for yokes used to mount valve actuators in the nuclear power industry. Through this example we demonstrate the process of creating a market segmentation grid, choosing a targeted segment, creating a product platform for the yoke cross-section, and subsequently defining the yoke product family using the product platform concept exploration method. The end result is a platform-based product family that will improve response to customer requests, reduce design and manufacturing costs, and improve time to market for companies that make small production runs of highly customized products.
引用
收藏
页码:541 / 556
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Product platform design to improve commonality in custom products
    Ronald S. Farrell
    Timothy W. Simpson
    [J]. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 2003, 14 : 541 - 556
  • [2] Using product dissection to integrate product family design research into the classroom and improve students' understanding of platform commonality
    Simpson, Timothy W.
    Thevenot, Henri J.
    [J]. Proceedings of the ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Vol 5, 2005, : 375 - 382
  • [3] Using product dissection to integrate product family design research into the classroom and improve students' understanding of platform commonality
    Simpson, Timothy W.
    Thevenot, Henri J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2007, 23 (01) : 120 - 130
  • [4] Automating the product design cycle for custom made products
    Bilalis, N
    Katsigiannis, JA
    Georgilakis, PS
    Souflaris, AT
    Antoniadis, A
    [J]. Design 2004: Proceedings of the 8th International Design Conference, Vols 1-3, 2004, : 129 - 134
  • [5] Modularity analysis and commonality design: a framework for the top-down platform and product family design
    Liu, Zhuo
    Wong, Yoke San
    Lee, Kim Seng
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2010, 48 (12) : 3657 - 3680
  • [6] PRODUCT FAMILY AND PRODUCT PLATFORM BENCHMARKING WITH COMMONALITY AND VARIETY INDICES
    Simpson, Timothy W.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL DESIGN ENGINEERING TECHNICAL CONFERENCES AND COMPUTERS AND INFORMATION IN ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, 2017, VOL 2B, 2017,
  • [7] Balancing commonality and performance within the concurrent design of multiple products in a product family
    Simpson, TW
    Seepersad, CC
    Mistree, F
    [J]. CONCURRENT ENGINEERING-RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS, 2001, 9 (03): : 177 - 190
  • [8] TOWARDS PRODUCT PLATFORM INTRODUCTION: OPTIMISING COMMONALITY OF COMPONENTS
    Zapico, Miguel
    Eckert, Claudia
    Jowers, Iestyn
    Earl, Christopher
    [J]. ICED 15, VOL 7: PRODUCT MODULARISATION, PRODUCT ARCHITECTURE, SYSTEMS ENGINEERING,PRODUCT SERVICE SYSTEMS, 2015,
  • [9] A metric for evaluating design commonality in product families
    Kota, S
    Sethuraman, K
    Miller, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN, 2000, 122 (04) : 403 - 410
  • [10] An efficient decomposed multiobjective genetic algorithm for solving the joint product platform selection and product family design problem with generalized commonality
    Aida Khajavirad
    Jeremy J. Michalek
    Timothy W. Simpson
    [J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2009, 39 : 187 - 201