Alleviating poverty: how do we know the scope of the problem and when we have solved it?

被引:5
|
作者
Dwyer, Rocky J. [1 ]
机构
[1] St Paul Univ, Fac Philosophy, Ottawa, ON, Canada
关键词
poverty; performance measurement (quality); stakeholder analysis;
D O I
10.1108/00251740710819078
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose - This paper aims to outline and discuss how to incorporate the stakeholder perspective into performance measurement framework to enhance program effectiveness, accountability and understanding in relation to human development issues. Design/methodology/approach - An examination of the literature and a review of best practices was undertaken to identify relevant performance measurements and indicators that could be utilized to measure incremental results and impacts related to poverty reduction strategies. Findings - Credible demonstration of policy or program impacts for poverty reduction are dependent on understanding the distinction between inputs, outputs, outcomes and indicators. Moreover, to be trusted by the public, performance reporting on poverty reduction needs to focus more selectively on identifying the key measures of performance and the engagement of key constituents. The intention of this paper is to identify some current best practices and suggest a model with potential indicators, which could be utilized to measure incremental results and impacts in relation to human development issues that we contend is the essential next step if the power and resources of stakeholders are to be harnessed in the fight against poverty while enabling organizations to implement new ways of approaching measurement effectiveness and accountability in a strategic and comprehensive manner. Practical implications - The paper advocates that an understanding of performance measurement theory and stakeholder engagement process can enable business leaders to create practical performance measurement frameworks, which in turn will lead to enhanced reporting and accountability for poverty reduction impacts and results. Originality/value - This paper presents an overview of the literature which both enhances personal knowledge and understanding at the theoretical and practical levels enabling business leaders to gain insight on the inherent stakeholder factors that need to be considered when designing performance measurement strategies and reporting frameworks.
引用
收藏
页码:1343 / 1358
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] How do we know when we have found competence?
    Doll, Beth
    [J]. PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY-RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2007, 38 (05) : 514 - 515
  • [2] HOW DO WE KNOW WHEN WE HAVE DONE ENOUGH TO PROTECT THE ENVIRONMENT
    LANDNER, L
    [J]. MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN, 1994, 29 (6-12) : 593 - 599
  • [3] How Do We Know When We Know?: Reflections on Method
    Kaestle, Carl
    [J]. HISTORY OF EDUCATION QUARTERLY, 2020, 60 (01) : 58 - 58
  • [4] How will we know when we have enough of them?
    Gilmore, WF
    [J]. AMERICAN SCIENTIST, 2003, 91 (02) : 98 - 98
  • [5] Restrictive Practices: How do we know when we have gone too far?
    Baker, Edward
    Xyrichis, Andreas
    Clark, Louise L.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL EMERGENCY NURSING, 2020, 50
  • [6] How Do We Know When They Are Real?
    Aronis, Konstantinos N.
    Berger, Ronald D.
    Ashikaga, Hiroshi
    [J]. CIRCULATION-ARRHYTHMIA AND ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2017, 10 (09):
  • [7] How Do We Know When to Celebrate?
    Mauksch, Larry B.
    Fogarty, Colleen T.
    [J]. FAMILIES SYSTEMS & HEALTH, 2014, 32 (02) : 135 - 136
  • [8] How do we know when peanut and tree nut allergy have resolved, and how do we keep it resolved?
    Byrne, A. M.
    Malka-Rais, J.
    Burks, A. W.
    Fleischer, D. M.
    [J]. CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ALLERGY, 2010, 40 (09): : 1303 - 1311
  • [9] What do we know and when do we know it?
    Nicholls, Anthony
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2008, 22 (3-4) : 239 - 255
  • [10] What do we know and when do we know it?
    Anthony Nicholls
    [J]. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, 2008, 22 : 239 - 255