Comparison of epidemiological characteristics and transmissibility of different strains of COVID-19 based on the incidence data of all local outbreaks in China as of March 1, 2022

被引:4
|
作者
Niu, Yan [1 ]
Luo, Li [2 ]
Yang, Shiting [2 ]
Abudurusuli, Guzainuer [2 ]
Wang, Xiaoye [1 ]
Zhao, Zeyu [2 ]
Rui, Jia [2 ]
Li, Zhuoyang [2 ]
Deng, Bin [2 ]
Liu, Weikang [2 ]
Zhang, Zhe [3 ]
Li, Kangguo [2 ]
Liu, Chan [2 ]
Li, Peihua [2 ]
Huang, Jiefeng [2 ]
Yang, Tianlong [2 ]
Wang, Yao [2 ]
Chen, Tianmu [2 ]
Li, Qun [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Publ Hlth Emergency Ctr, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Xiamen Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, State Key Lab Mol Vaccinol & Mol Diagnost, Xiamen, Fujian, Peoples R China
[3] Shandong Univ, Cheeloo Coll Med, Sch Basic Med Sci, Jinan, Peoples R China
关键词
SARS-CoV-2; effective reproduction number; variant; transmissibility; Delta variant; Omicron variant; SARS-COV-2; VARIANT; VIRAL LOAD; B.1.617.2; DYNAMICS; RATES;
D O I
10.3389/fpubh.2022.949594
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe epidemiological characteristics and transmissibility of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) may undergo changes due to the mutation of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) strains. The purpose of this study is to compare the differences in the outbreaks of the different strains with regards to aspects such as epidemiological characteristics, transmissibility, and difficulties in prevention and control. MethodsCOVID-19 data from outbreaks of pre-Delta strains, the Delta variant and Omicron variant, were obtained from the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Case data were collected from China's direct-reporting system, and the data concerning outbreaks were collected by on-site epidemiological investigators and collated by the authors of this paper. Indicators such as the effective reproduction number (R-eff), time-dependent reproduction number (R-t), rate of decrease in transmissibility (RDT), and duration from the illness onset date to the diagnosed date (D-ID)/reported date (D-IR) were used to compare differences in transmissibility between pre-Delta strains, Delta variants and Omicron variants. Non-parametric tests (namely the Kruskal-Wallis H and Mean-Whitney U tests) were used to compare differences in epidemiological characteristics and transmissibility between outbreaks of different strains. P < 0.05 indicated that the difference was statistically significant. ResultsMainland China has maintained a "dynamic zero-out strategy" since the first case was reported, and clusters of outbreaks have occurred intermittently. The strains causing outbreaks in mainland China have gone through three stages: the outbreak of pre-Delta strains, the outbreak of the Delta variant, and outbreaks involving the superposition of Delta and Omicron variant strains. Each outbreak of pre-Delta strains went through two stages: a rising stage and a falling stage, Each outbreak of the Delta variant and Omicron variant went through three stages: a rising stage, a platform stage and a falling stage. The maximum R-eff value of Omicron variant outbreaks was highest (median: 6.7; ranged from 5.3 to 8.0) and the differences were statistically significant. The RDT value of outbreaks involving pre-Delta strains was smallest (median: 91.4%; [IQR]: 87.30-94.27%), and the differences were statistically significant. The D-ID and D-IR for all strains was mostly in a range of 0-2 days, with more than 75%. The range of duration for outbreaks of pre-Delta strains was the largest (median: 20 days, ranging from 1 to 61 days), and the differences were statistically significant. ConclusionWith the evolution of the virus, the transmissibility of the variants has increased. The transmissibility of the Omicron variant is higher than that of both the pre-Delta strains and the Delta variant, and is more difficult to suppress. These findings provide us with get a more clear and precise picture of the transmissibility of the different variants in the real world, in accordance with the findings of previous studies. R-eff is more suitable than R-t for assessing the transmissibility of the disease during an epidemic outbreak.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A comparative study on epidemiological characteristics, transmissibility, and pathogenicity of three COVID-19 outbreaks caused by different variants
    Liu, Chan
    Lu, Jianhua
    Li, Peihua
    Feng, Siyang
    Guo, Yichao
    Li, Kangguo
    Zhao, Benhua
    Su, Yanhua
    Chen, Tianmu
    Zou, Xuan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2023, 134 : 78 - 87
  • [2] Epidemiological Analysis of COVID-19 Outbreaks in Wuhu, China, from January to March 2020
    Liu, Nicole Y.
    Xiao, Minmin
    Zhao, Jinhong
    Zhong, Shuzhi
    Wang, Ximei
    Nie, Lina
    Ma, Yanni
    Liu, Yujun
    Yang, Zhu
    [J]. JUNDISHAPUR JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY, 2022, 15 (08)
  • [3] Epidemiological characteristics of COVID-19 in Shenzhen, China: comparison between imported and local cases
    Li, Zhihui
    Wang, Jin
    Huang, Jingyi
    Lu, Jiahai
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFECTION IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES, 2020, 14 (08): : 853 - 860
  • [4] Comparison of spatiotemporal characteristics of the COVID-19 and SARS outbreaks in mainland China
    Xi Zhang
    Huaxiang Rao
    Yuwan Wu
    Yubei Huang
    Hongji Dai
    [J]. BMC Infectious Diseases, 20
  • [5] Comparison of spatiotemporal characteristics of the COVID-19 and SARS outbreaks in mainland China
    Zhang, Xi
    Rao, Huaxiang
    Wu, Yuwan
    Huang, Yubei
    Dai, Hongji
    [J]. BMC INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [6] Recollections of the COVID-19 Epidemiological Intelligence Task Force in China CDC, July 2021 to March 2022
    Zhou, Lei
    Shi, Guoqing
    Li, Hao
    Zhang, Yanping
    Li, Qun
    [J]. CHINA CDC WEEKLY, 2022, 4 (37): : 835 - 840
  • [7] Epidemiological characteristics of the three waves of COVID-19 epidemic in Taiwan during April 2022 to March 2023
    Chen, Yi-Hsuan
    Cheuh, Yu-Neng
    Chen, Chiu-Mei
    Kuo, Hung-Wei
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE FORMOSAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2023, 122 (11) : 1174 - 1182
  • [8] Epidemiological Comparison of Four COVID-19 Waves in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, March 2020–January 2022
    John Otokoye Otshudiema
    Gervais Léon T. Folefack
    Justus M. Nsio
    Placide Mbala-Kingebeni
    Cathy H. Kakema
    Joel B. Kosianza
    Antoine K. Mfumu
    Guy N. Saidi
    Patrice M. Kabongo
    Raphael Okum
    Tshibambe N. Tshimbombu
    Steve Ahuka-Mundeke
    Humphrey Cyprian Karamagi
    Jean-Jacques T. Muyembe
    Amédée Prosper Djiguimde
    [J]. Journal of Epidemiology and Global Health, 2022, 12 : 316 - 327
  • [9] Epidemiological features, genomic characteristics, and origin tracing of the COVID-19 outbreaks in Beijing from January to September 2022
    Feng, Zhaomin
    Huo, Da
    Cui, Shujuan
    Lyu, Bing
    Liang, Zhichao
    Li, Fu
    Yang, Peng
    Wang, Quanyi
    Zhang, Daitao
    Pan, Yang
    Duan, Wei
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY, 2023, 95 (03)
  • [10] Epidemiological Comparison of Four COVID-19 Waves in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, March 2020-January 2022
    Otshudiema, John Otokoye
    Folefack, Gervais Leon T.
    Nsio, Justus M.
    Mbala-Kingebeni, Placide
    Kakema, Cathy H.
    Kosianza, Joel B.
    Mfumu, Antoine K.
    Saidi, Guy N.
    Kabongo, Patrice M.
    Okum, Raphael
    Tshimbombu, Tshibambe N.
    Ahuka-Mundeke, Steve
    Karamagi, Humphrey Cyprian
    Muyembe, Jean-Jacques T.
    Djiguimde, Amedee Prosper
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GLOBAL HEALTH, 2022, 12 (03) : 316 - 327