Conservative treatment for closed fifth (small finger) metacarpal neck fractures

被引:53
|
作者
Poolman, RW [1 ]
Goslings, JC [1 ]
Lee, JB [1 ]
Muller, MS [1 ]
Steller, EP [1 ]
Struijs, PAA [1 ]
机构
[1] Acad Med Ctr, Orthopaed Res Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg, NL-1100 DD Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1002/14651858.CD003210.pub3
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Subcapital fractures of the fifth metacarpal bone, meaning fractures just below the knuckle of the little finger, account for approximately 20% of all hand fractures. Currently, there is no consensus concerning the optimal management of these fractures. Traditionally, treatment consists of closed reduction and external splinting in a neutral position using plaster of Paris ( POP), involving the metacarpal joint, the proximal interphalangeal joint and the carpo-metacarpal joint. An alternative treatment strategy is functional treatment using taping or bracing that does not restrict movement. Objectives To compare functional treatment with immobilization, and to compare different periods and types of immobilization, for the treatment of closed fifth metacarpal neck fractures in adults. Search strategy We searched the Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group Specialized Register ( July 2004), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library Issue 3, 2004), OVID OldMEDLINE (1951 to 1965), OVID MEDLINE (1966 to July 2004), OVID MEDLINE In-Process (July 2004), EMBASE (1988 to 2004, week 29), the Internet, and reference lists of articles. No language restrictions were applied. Selection criteria All randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials which compare functional treatment with immobilization or different types of immobilization for closed fifth metacarpal neck fractures. Data collection and analysis Two review authors assessed abstracts of all studies identified by the initial search, identified studies meeting the selection criteria, independently assessed the quality of the trial reports, and extracted and analysed the data. Main results Five studies met the inclusion criteria including a total of 252 participants. Most studies were of poor quality. The primary outcome measure, function of the hand, was not used in any studies. There was no evidence that any of the treatment modalities was statistically significantly superior. Authors' conclusions No included studies reported our primary outcome measure of interest, validated hand function. There was heterogeneity between the studies, which were of limited quality and size. No single non-operative treatment regimen for fracture of the neck of the fifth metacarpal can be recommended as superior to another in result. Further research is definitely warranted. Synopsis Not enough evidence to confirm which is the best amongst a number of commonly-used non-operative methods for managing fractures of the fifth metacarpal in the hand Fractures through the fifth metacarpal bone in the hand are common, particularly associated with punching a hard object. Methods used to treat the fracture include resting the hand in a splint until the fracture is healed, and various forms of partial splinting which allow the joints to be moved and the hand to be used. This review identified five studies which had compared one of these methods with another and found no evidence that any was superior to another.
引用
收藏
页数:36
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Conservative treatment for closed fifth metacarpal(small finger)fractures——Early versus delayed mobilization
    James F Kellam
    Branko Kopjar
    [J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志, 2007, (10)
  • [2] Small Finger Metacarpal Neck Fractures
    Beredjiklian, Pedro K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2009, 34A (08): : 1524 - 1526
  • [3] Small Finger Metacarpal Neck Fractures
    Budoff, Jeffrey E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2010, 35A (03): : 512 - 512
  • [4] The Treatment of Closed Finger and Metacarpal Fractures
    Kussmaul, Adrian Cavalcanti
    Kuehlein, Titus
    Langer, Martin F.
    Ayache, Ali
    Unglaub, Frank
    [J]. DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL, 2023, 120 (50): : 855 - 862
  • [5] Small Finger Metacarpal Neck Fractures Reply
    Beredjiklian, Pedro K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2010, 35A (03): : 513 - 513
  • [6] Outcomes of four distinct fixation methods in the conservative treatment of fifth metacarpal neck fractures
    Kilic, Ayhan
    Sokucu, Sami
    Basilgan, Seckin
    Yeniocak, Sedat
    Cetinkaya, Engin
    Parmaksizoglu, Atilla Sancar
    Kabukcuoglu, Yavuz Selim
    [J]. ULUSAL TRAVMA VE ACIL CERRAHI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF TRAUMA & EMERGENCY SURGERY, 2012, 18 (02): : 167 - 170
  • [7] Closed Reduction and Immobilization of Pediatric Fifth Metacarpal Neck Fractures
    Lee, Stella J.
    Merrison, Hannah
    Williams, Kathryn A.
    Vuillermin, Carley B.
    Bauer, Andrea S.
    [J]. HAND-AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR HAND SURGERY, 2022, 17 (03): : 416 - 421
  • [8] The Effect of Closed Reduction of Small Finger Metacarpal Neck Fractures on the Ultimate Angular Deformity
    Pace, Gregory I.
    Gendelberg, David
    Taylor, Kenneth F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2015, 40 (08): : 1582 - 1585
  • [9] Radiographic assessment of small finger metacarpal neck fractures
    Leung, YL
    Beredjiklian, PK
    Monaghan, BA
    Bozentka, DJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2002, 27A (03): : 443 - 448
  • [10] Nonsurgical Treatment of Fifth Metacarpal Neck Fractures Reply
    Hofmeister, Eric P.
    Shin, Alexander Y.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2009, 34A (03): : 578 - 579