Endangered Nectar-Feeding Bat Detected by Environmental DNA on Flowers

Simple Summary Nectar-feeding bats may leave DNA behind on flowers and this DNA may be detectible with genetic tools. Determining whether this is the case is important because some of these bat species follow "nectar corridors" during their migrations, and these corridors should be located for conservation and management. We collected flower samples from agaves that were visited by the Mexican long-nosed bat and developed two eDNA detection methods (DNA metabarcoding and qPCR) to assess whether bat DNA could be detected. We found that both methods were highly successful in detecting this bat species and other mammals and arthropods that may interact with agaves. We suggest that, together with a further proof of concept, these detection methods can be used for identifying nectar corridors and foraging grounds for the Mexican long-nosed bat. Leptonycteris nivalis (the Mexican long-nosed bat) is an endangered nectar-feeding bat species that follows "nectar corridors" as it migrates from Mexico to the southwestern United States. Locating these nectar corridors is key to their conservation and may be possible using environmental DNA (eDNA) from these bats. Hence, we developed and tested DNA metabarcoding and qPCR eDNA assays to determine whether L. nivalis could be detected by sampling the agave flowers on which it feeds. We sampled plants with known bat visitations in the Sierra Madre Oriental in Laguna de Sanchez (LS), Nuevo Leon, Mexico, and in the Chisos Mountains in Big Bend National Park, TX, USA (CB). A total of 13 samples included both swabs of agave umbels and cuttings of individual flowers. DNA metabarcoding was performed as a PCR multiplex that targeted bats (SFF-COI), arthropods (ANML-COI), and plants (ITS2 and rbcL). We targeted arthropods and plants in parallel with bats because future metabarcoding studies may wish to examine all the pollinators and plants within the nectar corridor. We developed and tested the sensitivity and specificity of two qPCR assays. We found that both DNA metabarcoding and qPCR were highly successful at detecting L. nivalis (11 of 13 for DNA metabarcoding and 12 of 13 for qPCR). Swabs and flower cuttings and both qPCR assays detected the species over four replicates. We suggest that L. nivalis leaves substantial DNA behind as it forages for nectar. We also suggest that future studies examine the time since sampling to determine its effect on detection success. The DNA metabarcoding multiplex will be useful for parallel questions regarding pollination ecology, while, with further testing, the qPCR assays will be effective for large-scale sampling for the detection of migration corridors and foraging areas. This work may be relevant to other nectar-feeding bat species, which can likely be detected with similar methodologies.