Uniaxial mechanical strain:: An in vitro correlate to distraction osteogenesis

被引:51
|
作者
Bhatt, Kirit A.
Chang, Eric I.
Warren, Stephen M.
Lin, Shin-e
Bastidas, Nicholas
Ghali, Shadi
Thibboneir, Aurelia
Capla, Jennifer M.
McCarthy, Joseph G.
Gurtner, Geoffrey C.
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] NYU, Sch Med, Inst Reconstruct Plast Surg, New York, NY USA
[3] Columbia Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, New York, NY USA
关键词
ostcoblast; mechanical strain; uniaxial; distraction osteogenesis;
D O I
10.1016/j.jss.2007.01.023
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. Distraction osteogenesis is a valuable clinical tool; however the molecular mechanisms governing successful distraction remain unknown. We have used a uniaxial in vitro strain device to simulate the uniaxial mechanical environment of the interfragmentary distraction gap. Materials and methods. Using the Flexcell system, normal human osteoblasts were subjected to different levels of cyclical uniaxial mechanical strain. Cellular morphology, proliferation, migration, and the expression of angiogenic (vascular endothelial growth factor [VEGF] and fibroblast growth factor-2 [FGF-2]) and osteogenic (osteonectin, osteopontin, and osteocalcin) proteins and extracellular matrix molecules (collagen I alpha II) were analyzed in response to uniaxial cyclic strain. Results. Osteoblasts exposed to strain assumed a fusiform spindle-shaped morphology aligning parallel to the axis of uniaxial strain and osteoblasts exposed to strain or conditioned media had a 3-fold increase in proliferation. Osteoblast migration was maximal (5-fold) in response to 9% strain. Angiogenic cytokine, VEGF, and FGF-2, increased 32-fold and 2.6-fold (P < 0.05), respectively. Osteoblasts expressed greater amounts of osteonectin, osteopontin, and osteocalcin (2.1-fold, 1.8-fold, 1.5-fold respectively, P < 0.01) at lower levels of strain (3%). Bone morphogenic protein-2 production increased maximally at 9% strain (1.6-fold, P < 0.01). Collagen I expression increased 13-, 66-, and 153-fold in response to 3, 6, and 9% strain, respectively. Conclusions. Uniaxial cyclic strain using the Flexcell device under appropriate strain parameters provides a novel in vitro model that induces osteoblast cellular and molecular expression patterns that simulate patterns observed in the in vivo distraction gap. (c) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:329 / 336
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Uniaxial Static Strain Promotes Osteoblast Proliferation and Bone Matrix Formation in Distraction Osteogenesis In Vitro
    Li, Zhengqiang
    Zheng, Junfa
    Wan, Di
    Yang, Xiaoqin
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 2020
  • [2] In vitro analysis of distraction osteogenesis
    Matsuno, M
    Hata, KI
    Sumi, Y
    Mizuno, H
    Ueda, M
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2000, 11 (04) : 303 - 307
  • [3] Effects of transforming growth factor-β and mechanical strain on osteoblast cell counts:: An in vitro model for distraction osteogenesis
    Gosain, AK
    Song, LS
    Santoro, T
    Weihrauch, D
    Bosi, BO
    Corrao, MA
    Chilian, WM
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2000, 105 (01) : 130 - 136
  • [4] Uniaxial static strain enhances osteogenic and angiogenic potential under hypoxic conditions in distraction osteogenesis
    Zhang, Lifang
    Peng, Yanhui
    Guo, Ting
    Fang, Wei
    Li, Zhengqiang
    Yang, Xiaoqin
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2024, 19 (01):
  • [5] An in vitro model for dissecting distraction osteogenesis
    Carinci, F
    Pezzetti, F
    Spina, AM
    Palmieri, A
    Carls, F
    Laino, G
    De Rosa, A
    Farina, E
    Illiano, F
    Stabellini, G
    LoMuzio, L
    Perrotti, V
    Piattelli, A
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2005, 16 (01) : 71 - 78
  • [6] An in vitro model for dissecting distraction osteogenesis - Discussion
    Salim, A
    Nacamuli, RP
    Lenton, KA
    Longaker, MT
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2005, 16 (01) : 78 - 79
  • [7] Evaluation of the mechanical environment during distraction osteogenesis
    Waanders, NA
    Richards, M
    Steen, H
    Kuhn, JL
    Goldstein, SA
    Goulet, JA
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 1998, (349) : 225 - 234
  • [8] Re: In vitro analysis of distraction osteogenesis. Discussion
    Spector, JA
    Longaker, MT
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2000, 11 (04) : 309 - 310
  • [9] Mechanical tension in distraction osteogenesis regulates chondrocytic differentiation
    Meyer, U
    Meyer, T
    Wiesmann, HP
    Kruse-Lösler, B
    Vollmer, D
    Stratmann, U
    Joos, U
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2001, 30 (06) : 522 - 530
  • [10] Transsutural Distraction Osteogenesis Versus Osteotemy Distraction Osteogenesis
    Liu, Chen
    Liu, Chunming
    Gao, Quanwen
    Hou, Min
    Li, Guizhen
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2012, 23 (02) : 464 - 471