共 50 条
Tools for Edible Cities: A Review of Tools for Planning and Assessing Edible Nature-Based Solutions
被引:8
|作者:
Mino, Eric
[1
]
Pueyo-Ros, Josep
[2
,3
]
Skerjanec, Mateja
[4
]
Castellar, Joana A. C.
[2
,3
]
Viljoen, Andre
[5
]
Istenic, Darja
[4
]
Atanasova, Natasa
[4
]
Bohn, Katrin
[5
]
Comas, Joaquim
[2
,3
,6
]
机构:
[1] Euromediterranean Water Informat Syst, Tech Unit, SEMIDE EMWIS, BP23,Pl Sophie Laffitte,Sophia Antipolis, F-06560 Valbonne, France
[2] Catalan Inst Water Res ICRA, Carrer Emili Grahit 101, Girona 17003, Spain
[3] Univ Girona, Placa St Domenec 3, Girona 17004, Spain
[4] Univ Ljubljana, Fac Civil & Geodet Engn, Jamova 2, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia
[5] Univ Brighton, Sch Architecture Technol & Engn, Lewes Rd,Mithras House, Brighton BN2 4AT, E Sussex, England
[6] Univ Girona, Inst Environm, LEQUIA, C Maria Aurelia Capmany 69, Girona 17003, Spain
来源:
基金:
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词:
nature-based solutions;
productive urban landscapes;
decision support systems;
edible cities;
urban agriculture;
circular economy;
OPEN SCIENCE;
URBAN;
D O I:
10.3390/w13172366
中图分类号:
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号:
08 ;
0830 ;
摘要:
In the last five years, European research and innovation programmes have prioritised the development of online catalogues and tools (handbooks, models, etc.) to facilitate the implementation and monitoring of Nature-Based Solutions (NBS). However, only a few catalogues and toolkits within European programmes are directly related to mainstreaming of NBS for food production (i.e., edible NBS). Therefore, the main aim of this paper is to present existing NBS tools through the eyes of productive urban landscapes. We reviewed 32 projects related to NBS and 50 tools were identified and characterised. Then, the six tools already available and provided indicators were further analysed in terms of their format and knowledge domains. Our main conclusion demonstrates that there is a lack of tools capable of supporting users for planning and implementing edible NBS; calculating the food potential of a city and/or of individual edible NBS, including the needed resources for implementation and operation (water, nutrients, energy); and assessing their urban design value, environmental and socio-economic impacts. Moreover, when they do exist, there is a resistance to share the models and equations behind the tools to allow other projects to reuse or validate them, a fact which is contrary to the open science principles upheld by many public research agencies.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文