Cost-benefit analysis of Gencos market trading with carbon-tax and cap-and-trade policies

被引:7
|
作者
Guo, Jingrong [1 ]
Xiang, Yue [1 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, Coll Elect Engn, Chengdu 610065, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Cost-benefit analysis; Carbon-tax; Cap-and-trade; Market trading;
D O I
10.1016/j.egyr.2022.05.260
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Environmental issues have made reducing carbon emissions a consensus among all countries. The electricity market provides a competitive environment and at the same time makes it possible to reduce the carbon emissions of the electricity system through market-oriented means. Firstly, this paper focuses on carbon-tax and cap-and-trade market policies and introduces the quotation models of power generation companies with the two market policies. Then, in a specific market scenario, the bidding strategies, cost-benefit changes, and the carbon emission changes of the power system are analyzed when the Gencos are affected by carbon-tax policies with different tax rates or cap-and-trade policies with different carbon quota allocation methods. The results show that with the increase of the carbon-tax rate, the market-clearing price rises; except for the coal-fired power plants with high carbon emissions, the profits of other Gencos increase, and the carbon emissions in the system decrease significantly. Using the baseline method, historical emission method, and carbon emission reduction intensity method to allocate carbon allowances among Gencos can all achieve carbon emission reduction effects, and the carbon emission reduction intensity method has the best effect. Finally, the trading strategy of coal-fired Gencos with the cap-and-trade policy is proposed to increase their profits. (C) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:900 / 907
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Carbon: Tax Not Cap-and-Trade
    Rosenblum, Dan
    Komanoff, Charles
    [J]. TIKKUN, 2007, 22 (04) : 52 - 55
  • [2] The choice of cap-and-trade and carbon tax regulations in a cap-dependent carbon trading price setting
    Xu, Xiaoping
    Yu, Yugang
    Dou, Guowei
    Ruan, Xiaomei
    [J]. KYBERNETES, 2022, 51 (08) : 2554 - 2577
  • [3] Sustainable Trade Credit and Replenishment Policies under the Cap-And-Trade and Carbon Tax Regulations
    Qin, Juanjuan
    Bai, Xiaojian
    Xia, Liangjie
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2015, 7 (12) : 16340 - 16361
  • [4] Ineffectiveness of carbon cap-and-trade market
    Yan, Yu
    Lei, Yiming
    Tang, Yuyang
    Zhao, Xufeng
    [J]. ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 34 (07) : 2317 - 2342
  • [5] Finding common ground in the debate between carbon tax and cap-and-trade policies
    Cleetus, Rachel
    [J]. BULLETIN OF THE ATOMIC SCIENTISTS, 2011, 67 (01) : 19 - 27
  • [6] Optimal decisions for competitive manufacturers under carbon tax and cap-and-trade policies
    Sun, Hongxia
    Yang, Jie
    [J]. COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2021, 156
  • [7] Carbon tax vs. cap-and-trade
    Schimmoller, Brian
    [J]. POWER ENGINEERING, 2007, 111 (05) : 8 - 8
  • [8] Implement Green Improvement or Buy Emission Permit? A Cost-benefit Analysis under Cap-and-Trade Environment
    Chen, Zhimin
    Zhang, Qiang
    Pan, Yanchun
    Zhou, Ming
    [J]. 2013 10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SERVICE SYSTEMS AND SERVICE MANAGEMENT (ICSSSM), 2013, : 309 - 313
  • [9] Optimal strategies for carbon emissions policies in competitive closed-loop supply chains: A comparative analysis of carbon tax and cap-and-trade policies
    Huang, Yuxin
    He, Pengfei
    Cheng, T. C. E.
    Xu, Senyu
    Pang, Chuan
    Tang, Huajun
    [J]. COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2024, 195
  • [10] On Emissions Trading and Market Structure: Cap-and-Trade versus Intensity Standards
    de Vries, Frans P.
    Dijkstra, Bouwe R.
    McGinty, Matthew
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2014, 58 (04): : 665 - 682