Neuroecology, chemical defense, and the keystone species concept

被引:57
|
作者
Zimmer, Richard K. [1 ,2 ]
Ferrer, Ryan P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Inst Brain Res, Program Neurosci, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
来源
BIOLOGICAL BULLETIN | 2007年 / 213卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
10.2307/25066641
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Neuroecology unifies principles from diverse disciplines, scaling from biophysical properties of nerve and muscle cells to community-wide impacts of trophic interactions. Here, these principles are used as a common fabric, woven from threads of chemosensory physiology, behavior, and population and community ecology. The "keystone species" concept, for example, is seminal in ecological theory. It defines a species whose impacts on communities are far greater than would be predicted from its relative abundance and biomass. Similarly, neurotoxins could function in keystone roles. They are rare within natural habitats but exert strong effects on species interactions at multiple trophic levels. Effects of two guanidine alkaloids, tetrodotoxin (TTX) and saxitoxin (STX), coalesce neurobiological and ecological perspectives. These molecules compose some of the most potent natural poisons ever described, and they are introduced into communities by one, or only a few, host species. Functioning as voltage-gated sodium channel blockers for nerve and muscle cells, TTX and STX serve in chemical defense. When borrowed by resistant consumer species, however, they are used either in chemical defense against higher order predators or for chemical communication as chemosensory excitants. Cascading effects of the compounds profoundly impact community-wide attributes, including species compositions and rates of material exchange. Thus, a diverse array of physiological traits, expressed differentially across many species, renders TTX and STX fully functional as keystone molecules, with vast ecological consequences at multiple trophic levels.
引用
收藏
页码:208 / 225
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Neuroecology, Chemical Defense, and the Keystone Concept
    Ferrer, Ryan P.
    Zimmer, Richard K.
    [J]. CHEMICAL SENSES, 2008, 33 (08) : S33 - S33
  • [2] THE KEYSTONE SPECIES CONCEPT
    YOUNG, DD
    [J]. AMERICAN BIOLOGY TEACHER, 1980, 42 (05): : 312 - &
  • [3] Biological Bulletin virtual symposium:: The neuroecology of chemical defense
    Zimmer, Richard K.
    Derby, Charles D.
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2007, 213 (03): : 205 - 207
  • [4] Invasive species and the cultural keystone species concept
    Nuñez, MA
    Simberloff, D
    [J]. ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2005, 10 (01):
  • [5] A CONVERSATION ON REFINING THE CONCEPT OF KEYSTONE SPECIES
    PAINE, RT
    [J]. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 1995, 9 (04) : 962 - 964
  • [6] A CRITICAL NOTE ON THE KEYSTONE SPECIES CONCEPT
    NICKOLAS, J
    [J]. AMERICAN BIOLOGY TEACHER, 1981, 43 (03): : 176 - 176
  • [7] The Neuroecology of Chemical Defenses
    Derby, Charles D.
    Aggio, Juan F.
    [J]. INTEGRATIVE AND COMPARATIVE BIOLOGY, 2011, 51 (05) : 771 - 780
  • [8] THE KEYSTONE-SPECIES CONCEPT IN ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION
    MILLS, LS
    SOULE, ME
    DOAK, DF
    [J]. BIOSCIENCE, 1993, 43 (04) : 219 - 224
  • [9] Linking keystone species and functional groups: A new operational definition of the keystone species concept - Response
    Davic, RD
    [J]. CONSERVATION ECOLOGY, 2003, 7 (01):
  • [10] Extending the concept of keystone species to communities and ecosystems
    Mouquet, Nicolas
    Gravel, Dominique
    Massol, Francois
    Calcagno, Vincent
    [J]. ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2013, 16 (01) : 1 - 8