How does adiabatic quantum computation fit into quantum automata theory?

被引:1
|
作者
Yamakami, Tomoyuki [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fukui, Fac Engn, 3-9-1 Bunkyo, Fukui 9108507, Japan
关键词
Adiabatic quantum computation; Quantum finite automata; Hamiltonian; Schrodinger equation; Decision problem; Promise problem; FINITE AUTOMATA;
D O I
10.1016/j.ic.2021.104694
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
Quantum computation has emerged as a powerful computational medium of our time, having demonstrated the remarkable efficiency in factoring a positive integer and searching databases faster than any currently known classical computing algorithm. Adiabatic evolution of quantum systems has been studied as a potential means that physically realizes quantum computation. Up to now, all the research on adiabatic quantum systems has dealt with polynomial time-bounded computation and little attention has been paid to, for instance, adiabatic quantum systems consuming only constant memory space. Such quantum systems can be modeled in a form similar to quantum finite automata. This exposition dares to ask a bold question of how to make adiabatic quantum computation fit into the rapidly progressing framework of quantum automata theory. As our answer to this eminent but profound question, we first lay out a fundamental platform to carry out adiabatic evolutionary quantum systems (AEQSs) with limited computational resources (in size, energy, spectral gap, etc.) and then demonstrate how to construct such AEQSs by operating suitable families of quantum finite automata. We further explore fundamental structural properties of decision problems (as well as promise problems) solved quickly by the appropriately constructed AEQSs. (c) 2021 Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] How Does Adiabatic Quantum Computation Fit into Quantum Automata Theory?
    Yamakami, Tomoyuki
    DESCRIPTIONAL COMPLEXITY OF FORMAL SYSTEMS, DCFS 2019, 2019, 11612 : 285 - 297
  • [2] How powerful is adiabatic quantum computation?
    van Dam, W
    Mosca, M
    Vazirani, U
    42ND ANNUAL SYMPOSIUM ON FOUNDATIONS OF COMPUTER SCIENCE, PROCEEDINGS, 2001, : 279 - 287
  • [3] Adiabatic quantum computation
    Albash, Tameem
    Lidar, Daniel A.
    REVIEWS OF MODERN PHYSICS, 2018, 90 (01)
  • [4] Adiabatic quantum computation is equivalent to standard quantum computation
    Aharonov, D
    van Dam, W
    Kempe, J
    Landau, Z
    Lloyd, S
    Regev, O
    45TH ANNUAL IEEE SYMPOSIUM ON FOUNDATIONS OF COMPUTER SCIENCE, PROCEEDINGS, 2004, : 42 - 51
  • [5] Adiabatic Quantum Computation Is Equivalent to Standard Quantum Computation
    Aharonov, Dorit
    van Dam, Wim
    Kempe, Julia
    Landau, Zeph
    Lloyd, Seth
    Regev, Oded
    SIAM REVIEW, 2008, 50 (04) : 755 - 787
  • [6] Adiabatic quantum computation is equivalent to standard quantum computation
    Aharonov, Dorit
    Van Dam, Wim
    Kempe, Julia
    Landau, Zeph
    Lloyd, Seth
    Regev, Oded
    SIAM JOURNAL ON COMPUTING, 2007, 37 (01) : 166 - 194
  • [7] Quantum adiabatic computation and adiabatic conditions
    Wei, Zhaohui
    Ying, Mingsheng
    PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2007, 76 (02)
  • [8] LEARNING QUANTUM OPERATOR BY QUANTUM ADIABATIC COMPUTATION
    Liu, Ding
    Jiang, Minghu
    2014 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SIGNAL PROCESSING (ICSP), 2014, : 63 - 67
  • [9] Robust quantum control for adiabatic quantum computation
    Quiroz, Gregory
    PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2019, 99 (06)
  • [10] An overview of quantum computation models: Quantum automata
    Qiu D.
    Li L.
    Frontiers of Computer Science in China, 2008, 2 (2): : 193 - 207