Using an alternatives assessment framework to evaluate waterborne versus solventborne basecoats used in automotive refinishing

被引:3
|
作者
Brown, Lawrence A. [1 ]
Fisk, Grace [2 ]
Cohen, Martin A. [3 ]
Crollard, Allison [3 ]
Whittaker, Stephen G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Publ Hlth Seattle & King Cty, Hazardous Waste Management Program King Cty, Seattle, WA 98104 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Dept Environm & Occupat Hlth Sci, Water & Land Resources Div, Hazardous Waste Management Program King Cty, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] Univ Washington, Dept Environm & Occupat Hlth Sci, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
Alternatives assessment; Automotive refinishing; Safer alternative; Solventborne basecoats; Waterborne basecoats;
D O I
10.1002/ieam.4543
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
We evaluated two types of automotive basecoats used in automotive refinishing (i.e., in auto body shops): waterborne and solventborne. The primary tool we used for this evaluation was the Alternatives Assessment Guide (version 1.0) developed by the Interstate Chemicals Clearinghouse (IC2). The term "solventborne," as used in this article, refers to products that contain relatively high concentrations of volatile organic compounds (referred to as "high-volatile organic compound [VOC] base-coats" in the industry). These products are distinct from the "low-VOC" solventborne products used widely in California and elsewhere. From a health and environmental hazard perspective, our evaluation found that waterborne basecoats contained fewer hazardous ingredients and at lower concentrations than their solventborne counterparts. Automotive painters who spray-painted vehicles with waterborne products experienced significantly lower exposures to several harmful solvents. Waterborne products are readily available and offer advantages with regard to social impacts. Some of these advantages include lower worker and community exposure to VOCs, reduced VOC release and smog formation, and reduced potential for generation of and exposure to hazardous waste. Based on our assessment in auto body shops, we consider waterborne basecoats to be safer alternatives from both a human health and environmental perspective.
引用
收藏
页码:1101 / 1113
页数:13
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] Assessment of Healthcare Waste Treatment Alternatives Using an Integrated Decision Support Framework
    Hinduja, Akshay
    Pandey, Manju
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS, 2019, 12 (01) : 318 - 333
  • [2] Assessment of Healthcare Waste Treatment Alternatives Using an Integrated Decision Support Framework
    Akshay Hinduja
    Manju Pandey
    International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 2018, 12 : 318 - 333
  • [3] Analysis of the recycling potential of used automotive oil filters using the Life Cycle Assessment approach
    Gaidajis, Georgios
    Angelakoglou, Komninos
    Botsaris, Pantelis N.
    Filippidou, Faidra
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2011, 55 (11) : 986 - 994
  • [4] Management Assessment of used Oil, Filters, and containers in the Canadian automotive sector using resource recovery metrics
    Tasnim, Anica
    Abha, Anika Tahsin
    Naghibalsadati, Farzin
    Tam, Edwin
    Ng, Kelvin Tsun Wai
    WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2025, 191 : 284 - 293
  • [5] USING QUALITATIVE BEHAVIOURAL ASSESSMENT TO EVALUATE MOUSE BEHAVIOUR AS AN INDICATOR OF CHRONIC VERSUS ACUTE PAIN
    Marin, F.
    Martin, M.
    Mehigan, S.
    d'Alton, M.
    Reynolds, A. L.
    IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 192 (SUPPL 1) : S38 - S38
  • [6] Early Safety Assessment of Automotive Systems Using Sabotage Simulation-Based Fault Injection Framework
    Juez, Garazi
    Amparan, Estibaliz
    Lattarulo, Ray
    Ruiz, Alejandra
    Perez, Joshue
    Espinoza, Huascar
    COMPUTER SAFETY, RELIABILITY, AND SECURITY, SAFECOMP 2017, 2017, 10488 : 255 - 269
  • [7] Framework to Evaluate Exposure Relevance and Data Needs for Risk Assessment of Nanomaterials using in Vitro Testing Strategies
    Sharma, Monita
    Shatkin, Jo Anne
    Cairns, Carolyn
    Canady, Richard
    Clippinger, Amy J.
    RISK ANALYSIS, 2016, 36 (08) : 1551 - 1563
  • [8] Using the Bayesian Network Relative Risk Model Risk Assessment Process to Evaluate Management Alternatives for the South River and Upper Shenandoah River, Virginia
    Johns, Annie F.
    Graham, Scarlett E.
    Harris, Meagan J.
    Markiewicz, April J.
    Stinson, Jonah M.
    Landis, Wayne G.
    INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, 13 (01) : 100 - 114
  • [9] Evaluate user satisfaction for urban design of railway station areas: An assessment framework using agent-based simulation
    Enshan, Chen
    van de Spek, Stefan
    van der Hoeven, Frank
    Triggianese, Manuela
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2025, 110
  • [10] Using a novel assessment framework to evaluate protective functions and timber production in Austrian mountain forests under climate change
    Maroschek, Michael
    Rammer, Werner
    Lexer, Manfred J.
    REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE, 2015, 15 (08) : 1543 - 1555