Tool steel material selection using PROMETHEE II method

被引:43
|
作者
Maity, Saikat Ranjan [1 ]
Chakraborty, Shankar [2 ]
机构
[1] Haldia Inst Technol, Dept Prod Engn, Haldia 721657, W Bengal, India
[2] Jadavpur Univ, Dept Prod Engn, Kolkata 700032, W Bengal, India
关键词
Tool steel material; PROMETHEE; Outranking flow; Rank; DECISION-MAKING; DESIGN; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1007/s00170-014-6760-0
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
In the recent century, tools for machining, forming, or other types of metalworking industries have consumed several tons of steel materials. Although the earliest tool steels were plain carbon steels, the modern tools contain different alloying elements, like tungsten, vanadium, molybdenum, manganese, and chromium, to provide the properties desired for their wide applications. The presence of a large number of such tool steel materials is a result of the fact that no single material combines the maximum wear resistance, toughness, machinability, safety in hardening, and non-deformability properties. Each tool steel material has its own mechanical and physical characteristics that help it to be suited for a particular application. Also for a specific application, more than one alternative tool steel material may exist, which makes it essential to select the most appropriate tool steel material with the desired properties to meet the manufacturer's requirements. This paper considers a list of ten tool steel materials whose performances are evaluated based on nine selection criteria. Preference ranking organization method for enrichment evaluation (PROMETHEE II) is then applied to solve this tool steel material selection problem to obtain the full ranking of the considered material alternatives. Molybdenum-type high-speed steel (AISI M2) and tungsten base high-speed tool steel (AISI T1) are the two best choices. Alloy steel (AISI 4140) is the worst preferred tool steel material.
引用
收藏
页码:1537 / 1547
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Tool steel material selection using PROMETHEE II method
    Saikat Ranjan Maity
    Shankar Chakraborty
    The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2015, 78 : 1537 - 1547
  • [2] Selection of the Best Method for Underpinning Foundations Using the PROMETHEE II Method
    Dachowski, Ryszard
    Galek, Katarzyna
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (13)
  • [3] A Novel Contractor Selection Technique Using the Extended PROMETHEE II Method
    Chang, Kuei-Hu
    MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING, 2021, 2021
  • [4] Material Selection for Turbine Seal Strips using PROMETHEE-GAIA Method
    Zindani, Divya
    Kumar, Kaushik
    MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS, 2018, 5 (09) : 17533 - 17539
  • [5] Material Selection for Artificial Femur Bone Using PROMETHEE-GAIA Method
    Kocak, Muhammed Tayyip
    Bayrakl, Mehmet Said
    Kuncan, Melih
    JOURNAL OF TESTING AND EVALUATION, 2024, 52 (02) : 1051 - 1063
  • [6] Selection of Material for Wind Turbine Blade using PROMETHEE-GAIA Method
    Zindani, Divya
    Maity, Saikat Ranjan
    Bhowmik, Sumit
    RENEWABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGY: ISSUES AND PERSPECTIVES (RETIP-2017), 2018, 1998
  • [7] Best criteria selection based PROMETHEE II method
    Anjali Singh
    Anjana Gupta
    Aparna Mehra
    OPSEARCH, 2021, 58 : 160 - 180
  • [8] Best criteria selection based PROMETHEE II method
    Singh, Anjali
    Gupta, Anjana
    Mehra, Aparna
    OPSEARCH, 2021, 58 (01) : 160 - 180
  • [9] Advanced Material Selection for Semiconductor Switching Devices in Electric Vehicles using PROMETHEE Method
    Shimin, V. V.
    Shah, Varsha A.
    Lokhande, Makarand M.
    2016 IEEE VEHICLE POWER AND PROPULSION CONFERENCE (VPPC), 2016,
  • [10] SUPPLIER SELECTION USING PROMETHEE SEQUENCING METHOD
    Dagdeviren, Metin
    Eraslan, Erguen
    JOURNAL OF THE FACULTY OF ENGINEERING AND ARCHITECTURE OF GAZI UNIVERSITY, 2008, 23 (01): : 69 - 75