Failure parameter identification and validation for a dual-phase 780 steel sheet

被引:55
|
作者
Anderson, D. [1 ,2 ]
Butcher, C. [1 ]
Pathak, N. [1 ]
Worswick, M. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Waterloo, Mech & Mechatron Engn, 200 Univ Ave W, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
[2] Novelis Inc, 1950 Vaughn Rd, Kennesaw, GA 30144 USA
关键词
Damage; Fracture; Dual-phase; 780; steel; Butterfly specimen; Sheet metal forming; GISSMO; Failure prediction; HIGH-STRENGTH STEEL; DUCTILE FRACTURE; STRESS-TRIAXIALITY; STRAIN-RATE; PREDICTION; CRITERION; CALIBRATION; PRESSURE; BEHAVIOR; DAMAGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.06.018
中图分类号
O3 [力学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0801 ;
摘要
A hybrid experimental-numerical procedure was implemented to determine the failure surface of a dual phase 780 steel sheet as a function of the effective plastic strain, triaxiality, and Lode parameter using butterfly specimens with in situ digital image correlation strain measurement and supporting finite element calculations. A butterfly-type test specimen was employed to experimentally obtain stress states ranging from simple shear to plane strain tension including mixed tensile and shear loading. The numerically-derived failure surface was implemented into the phenomenological GISSMO damage model in the commercial finite element code LS-DYNA and the accuracy of the failure surface was determined using finite element predictions of the characterization experiments. A series of independent validation experiments related to sheet metal forming were performed including a hole tension test, a conical and flat punch hole expansion test, and a hemispherical punch test. The finite element models utilizing the damage model were able to accurately reproduce the load-displacement and surface strains of the sheet material for both the characterization and validation experiments. Prediction of the failure orientation and location compared favorably to each of the validation tests. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:89 / 107
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Failure characteristics of a dual-phase steel sheet
    Bjorklund, Oscar
    Nilsson, Larsgunnar
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATERIALS PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 214 (06) : 1190 - 1204
  • [2] VALIDATION OF THE DUAL-PHASE STEEL FAILURE MODEL AT THE MICROSCALE
    Perzynski, Konrad
    Ososkov, Yuriy
    Wilkinson, David S.
    Jain, Mukesh
    Wang, Jiangting
    Madej, Lukasz
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR MULTISCALE COMPUTATIONAL ENGINEERING, 2017, 15 (05) : 443 - 458
  • [3] MECHANICAL ANISOTROPY OF A DUAL-PHASE STEEL SHEET
    SUGIMOTO, K
    [J]. TETSU TO HAGANE-JOURNAL OF THE IRON AND STEEL INSTITUTE OF JAPAN, 1985, 71 : 1291 - 1291
  • [4] Nitrogen Effects in Dual-Phase Sheet Steel
    Tyson W. Brown
    John G. Speer
    David K. Matlock
    Dennis M. Haezebrouck
    [J]. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, 2011, 42 : 3611 - 3619
  • [5] Nitrogen Effects in Dual-Phase Sheet Steel
    Brown, Tyson W.
    Speer, John G.
    Matlock, David K.
    Haezebrouck, Dennis M.
    [J]. METALLURGICAL AND MATERIALS TRANSACTIONS A-PHYSICAL METALLURGY AND MATERIALS SCIENCE, 2011, 42A (12): : 3611 - 3619
  • [6] DAMAGE IN SHEET FORMING OF A DUAL-PHASE STEEL
    ZHANG, YZ
    HU, XY
    HUANG, JQ
    [J]. RES MECHANICA, 1990, 31 (01): : 35 - 48
  • [7] Failure Initiation in Dual-Phase Steel
    Ramazani, A.
    Schwedt, A.
    Aretz, A.
    Prahl, U.
    [J]. LOCAL MECHANICAL PROPERTIES IX, 2014, 586 : 67 - +
  • [8] FATIGUE OF A HIGHLY PRESTRAINED DUAL-PHASE SHEET STEEL
    GUSTAVSSON, A
    MELANDER, A
    [J]. FATIGUE & FRACTURE OF ENGINEERING MATERIALS & STRUCTURES, 1995, 18 (02) : 201 - 210
  • [9] Uniaxial Ratcheting Behavior of Dual-Phase Steel Sheet
    Partha Sarathi De
    Jayanta Kumar Mahato
    Amrita Kundu
    P. C. Chakraborti
    M. Shome
    [J]. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, 2018, 27 : 3688 - 3698
  • [10] Uniaxial Ratcheting Behavior of Dual-Phase Steel Sheet
    Sarathi, De Partha
    Mahato, Jayanta Kumar
    Kundu, Amrita
    Chakraborti, P. C.
    Shome, M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATERIALS ENGINEERING AND PERFORMANCE, 2018, 27 (07) : 3688 - 3698