Group discussion as interactive dialogue or as serial monologue: The influence of group size

被引:101
|
作者
Fay, N
Garrod, S
Carletta, J
机构
[1] Univ Glasgow, Dept Psychol, Human Commun Res Ctr, Glasgow G12 9YR, Lanark, Scotland
[2] Univ Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9YL, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
D O I
10.1111/1467-9280.00292
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Current models draw a broad distinction between communication as dialogue and communication as monologue. The two kinds of models have different implications for who influences whom in a group discussion. If the discussion is like interactive dialogue, group members should be influenced most by those with whom they interact in the discussion; if it is like serial monologue, they should be influenced most by the dominant speaker. The experiments reported here show that in small, 5-person groups, the communication is like dialogue and members are influenced most by; those with whom they interact in the discussion. However in large,10-person groups, the communication is like monologue and members are influenced most by the dominant speaker The difference in mode of communication is explained in terms of how speakers in the two sizes of groups design their utterances for different audiences.
引用
收藏
页码:481 / 486
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Guide to Setting Up a College Bereavement Group: Using Monologue, Soliloquy, and Dialogue
    Prior, Alexandra
    JOURNAL OF COLLEGE STUDENT PSYCHOTHERAPY, 2015, 29 (02) : 111 - 119
  • [2] Influence of group size on students' participation in online discussion forums
    Kim, Jungjoo
    COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2013, 62 : 123 - 129
  • [3] Interactive group journals: Learning as a dialogue among learners
    Cole, R
    Raffier, LM
    Rogan, P
    Schleicher, L
    TESOL QUARTERLY, 1998, 32 (03) : 556 - 568
  • [4] INFORMATIONAL INFLUENCE IN GROUP DISCUSSION
    BISHOP, GD
    MYERS, DG
    ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN PERFORMANCE, 1974, 12 (01): : 92 - 104
  • [5] The fifth Holocaust Dialogue interactive group session: Lessons to be learned
    Kaslow, FW
    JOURNAL OF MARITAL AND FAMILY THERAPY, 2000, 26 (02) : 253 - 259
  • [6] Investigating the combined effects of group size and group composition in online discussion
    Yang, Tingting
    Luo, Heng
    Sun, Di
    ACTIVE LEARNING IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2022, 23 (02) : 115 - 128
  • [7] Group discussion based on the model of interactive genetic algorithms
    Song, Dongming
    Zhu, Yaoqin
    Wu, Huizhong
    2008 PROCEEDINGS OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEM SCIENCES: ITESS 2008, VOL 4, 2008, : 283 - 287
  • [8] ASYNCHRONOUS DISCUSSION: A Comparison Of Larger and Smaller Discussion Group Size
    Bristol, Tim J.
    Kyarsgaard, Victoria
    NURSING EDUCATION PERSPECTIVES, 2012, 33 (06) : 386 - 390
  • [9] Egalitarian Interactive Group Dialogue for children in at-risk school contexts
    Nunez Solis, Marcela
    Murillo Estepa, Paulino
    LEARNING CULTURE AND SOCIAL INTERACTION, 2021, 28
  • [10] Influence of Group Size and Group Composition on the adhered Distance Headway
    Duives, Dorine
    Daamen, Winnie
    Hoogendoorn, Serge
    CONFERENCE ON PEDESTRIAN AND EVACUATION DYNAMICS 2014 (PED 2014), 2014, 2 : 183 - 188