Methodology for the evaluation of engineered in situ bioremediation:: lessons from a case study

被引:26
|
作者
Höhener, P [1 ]
Hunkeler, D [1 ]
Hess, A [1 ]
Bregnard, T [1 ]
Zeyer, J [1 ]
机构
[1] ETH Zurich, Inst Terr Ecol Soil Biol, CH-8952 Schlieren, Switzerland
关键词
bioremediation; groundwater; in situ hybridization; microcosms; laboratory aquifer columns; petroleum hydrocarbons;
D O I
10.1016/S0167-7012(98)00022-0
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Engineered in situ bioremediation is an economically and ecologically sound technology for the clean-up of contaminated soils and aquifers. However, a successful bioremediation requires solid evidence for the detoxification of the contaminants, preferably proven by complete mineralization. This paper discusses a stepwise evaluation leading to the demonstration of successful engineered in situ bioremediation. Five major evaluation steps assess whether: (1) the contaminants can be mineralized by the indigenous microbial population (2) the mineralization rates can be increased (3) the remediation concept can be simulated under continuous flow conditions (4) the increase of mineralization rates can be achieved at the field site (scale-up), and (5) complete mineralization to harmless end products is achieved at the field site. For these evaluations, the applicability of four experimental approaches (field investigations, laboratory aquifer columns, microcosms and microbial cultures) and the relevance of various microbiological or chemical monitoring parameters are discussed. The evaluations are illustrated using a specific engineered in situ bioremediation of a diesel fuel-contaminated aquifer in Menziken, Switzerland. The case study demonstrates that microbiological and chemical monitoring parameters as well as field tracer studies and stable carbon isotopes should be combined for the unequivocal evaluation of engineered in situ bioremediation. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:179 / 192
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] In situ bioremediation of MTBE: Lessons from laboratory experiments.
    Deshusses, MA
    Morales, M
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2000, 219 : U637 - U637
  • [2] Evaluation use and the CEFP -: Lessons from a case study
    Mattessich, PW
    Compton, DW
    Baizerman, M
    CANCER PRACTICE, 2001, 9 : S85 - S91
  • [3] In situ bioremediation of a soil contaminated by mineral oil: A case study
    Pinelli, D
    Nocentini, M
    Fava, F
    IN SITU BIOREMEDIATION OF PETROLEUM HYDROCARBON AND OTHER ORGANIC COMPOUNDS, 1999, : 313 - 318
  • [4] Engineered in situ bioremediation of soil and groundwater polluted with weathered hydrocarbons
    Menendez-Vega, Demelza
    Gallego, Jose Luis R.
    Isabel Pelaez, Ana
    de Cordoba, Gonzalo Fernandez
    Moreno, Javier
    Munoz, Daniel
    Sanchez, Jesus
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOIL BIOLOGY, 2007, 43 (5-6) : 310 - 321
  • [5] Mobilising Q methodology within a realist evaluation: Lessons from an empirical study
    Harris, Kevin
    Henderson, Steven
    Wink, Brian
    EVALUATION, 2019, 25 (04) : 430 - 448
  • [6] Field application of genetically engineered microorganisms for PAH bioremediation: Lessons learned
    Burlage, RS
    Palumbo, A
    Matrubutham, U
    Sayler, GS
    IN SITU AND ON-SITE BIOREMEDIATION, VOL 4, 1997, 4(4) (04): : 77 - 77
  • [7] Engineered and subsequent intrinsic in situ bioremediation of a diesel fuel contaminated aquifer
    Hunkeler, D
    Höhener, P
    Zeyer, J
    JOURNAL OF CONTAMINANT HYDROLOGY, 2002, 59 (3-4) : 231 - 245
  • [8] Feasibility study of thermal in situ bioremediation
    Kosegi, JM
    Minsker, BS
    Dougherty, DE
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 2000, 126 (07): : 601 - 610
  • [9] Engineered and subsequent intrinsic in situ bioremediation of a diesel fuel-contaminated aquifer
    Höhener, P
    Hunkeler, D
    Zeyer, J
    GROUNDWATER 2000, 2000, : 387 - 388
  • [10] Web site evaluation: Methodology and case study
    Atzeni, P
    Merialdo, P
    Sindoni, G
    CONCEPTUAL MODELING FOR NEW INFORMATION SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGIES, 2002, 2465 : 253 - 263