Development and Validation of the User Version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale (uMARS)

被引：392
|
作者：
Stoyanov, Stoyan R. [1 ,2 ]
Hides, Leanne [1 ,2 ]
Kavanagh, David J. [1 ,2 ]
Wilson, Hollie [1 ,2 ]
机构：
[1] Queensland Univ Technol, Sch Psychol & Counselling, Ctr Childrens Hlth Res, Inst Hlth & Biomed Innovat, 62 Graham St, Brisbane, Qld 4101, Australia
[2] Young & Well Cooperat Res Ctr, Abbotsford, Vic, Australia
来源：
JMIR MHEALTH AND UHEALTH | 2016年 / 4卷 / 02期
基金：
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词：
MARS; mHealth; eHealth; app evaluation; end user; app trial; mhealth trial; user testing; mobile application; app rating; reliability; mobile health; well being; mental health; smartphone; cellphone; telemedicine; ehealth; emental health; e-therapy; Internet; online; cognitive behavioral therapy; anxiety; anxiety disorders; depression; depressive disorder; Australia; research translation; evidence-informed; mHealth implementation; mHealth evaluation; randomized controlled trial; RCT; HEALTH; APPS; METAANALYSIS; RELIABILITY;
D O I：
10.2196/mhealth.5849
中图分类号：
R19 [保健组织与事业（卫生事业管理）];
学科分类号：
摘要：
Background: The Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS) provides a reliable method to assess the quality of mobile health (mHealth) apps. However, training and expertise in mHealth and the relevant health field is required to administer it. Objective: This study describes the development and reliability testing of an end-user version of the MARS (uMARS). Methods: The MARS was simplified and piloted with 13 young people to create the uMARS. The internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the uMARS was then examined in a second sample of 164 young people participating in a randomized controlled trial of a mHealth app. App ratings were collected using the uMARS at 1-, 3,- and 6-month follow up. Results: The uMARS had excellent internal consistency (alpha = .90), with high individual alphas for all subscales. The total score and subscales had good test-retest reliability over both 1-2 months and 3 months. Conclusions: The uMARS is a simple tool that can be reliably used by end-users to assess the quality of mHealth apps.
引用
收藏
页码：589 / 593
页数：5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Response to "Development and Validation of the User Version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale (uMARS)"
    Baptista, Shaira
    Oldenburg, Brian
    O'Neil, Adrienne
    [J]. JMIR MHEALTH AND UHEALTH, 2017, 5 (06): : 51 - 53
  • [2] Greek validation of the user version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale (uMARS)
    Chasiotis, Georgios
    Stoyanov, Stoyan R.
    Karatzas, Anastasios
    Gravas, Stavros
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2023, 51 (03)
  • [3] Spanish adaptation and validation of the User Version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale (uMARS)
    Martin-Payo, Ruben
    Carrasco-Santos, Sergio
    Cuesta, Marcelino
    Stoyan, Stoyan
    Gonzalez-Mendez, Xana
    del Mar Fernandez-Alvarez, Maria
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2021, 28 (12) : 2681 - 2686
  • [4] Development and validation of the Japanese version of the uMARS (user version of the mobile app rating system)
    Shinohara, Yoshikazu
    Yamamoto, Kazumichi
    Ito, Masami
    Sakata, Masatsugu
    Koizumi, Shiho
    Hashisako, Mizuho
    Sato, Masaaki
    Wannous, Muhammad
    Stoyanov, Stoyan R.
    Nakajima, Jun
    Furukawa, Toshiaki A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2022, 165
  • [5] Turkish Validation of the User Version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale
    Calik, Gokhan
    Kartal, Betul Bersan
    Stoyanov, Stoyan
    Gravas, Stavros
    Othman, Lavin
    de la Rosette, Jean
    Albayrak, Selami
    Laguna, Pilar
    [J]. TURKISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 48 (03): : 236 - 242
  • [6] 'Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator' mobile applications (Apps): a systematic review and scoring using the validated user version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale (uMARS)
    Adam, Ahmed
    Hellig, Julian C.
    Perera, Marlon
    Bolton, Damien
    Lawrentschuk, Nathan
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 36 (04) : 565 - 573
  • [7] ‘Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator’ mobile applications (Apps): a systematic review and scoring using the validated user version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale (uMARS)
    Ahmed Adam
    Julian C. Hellig
    Marlon Perera
    Damien Bolton
    Nathan Lawrentschuk
    [J]. World Journal of Urology, 2018, 36 : 565 - 573
  • [8] Japanese Version of the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS): Development and Validation
    Yamamoto, Kazumichi
    Ito, Masami
    Sakata, Masatsugu
    Koizumi, Shiho
    Hashisako, Mizuho
    Sato, Masaaki
    Stoyanov, Stoyan R.
    Furukawa, Toshi A.
    Yamamoto, Kazumichi
    [J]. JMIR MHEALTH AND UHEALTH, 2022, 10 (04):
  • [9] The Arabic Version of the Mobile App Rating Scale: Development and Validation Study
    Bardus, Marco
    Awada, Nathalie
    Ghandour, Lilian A.
    Fares, Elie-Jacques
    Gherbal, Tarek
    Al-Zanati, Tasnim
    Stoyanov, Stoyan R.
    [J]. JMIR MHEALTH AND UHEALTH, 2020, 8 (03):
  • [10] Quality of a Supporting Mobile App for Rheumatic Patients: Patient-Based Assessment Using the User Version of the Mobile Application Scale (uMARS)
    Lambrecht, Antonia
    Vuillerme, Nicolas
    Raab, Christina
    Simon, David
    Messner, Eva-Maria
    Hagen, Melanie
    Bayat, Sara
    Kleyer, Arnd
    Aubourg, Timothee
    Schett, Georg
    Hueber, Axel
    Knitza, Johannes
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2021, 8
12345