Association between a 17-gene genomic prostate score and multi-parametric prostate MRI in men with low and intermediate risk prostate cancer (PCa)

被引:20
|
作者
Leapman, Michael S. [1 ,2 ]
Westphalen, Antonio C. [3 ]
Ameli, Niloufar [2 ]
Lawrence, H. Jeffrey [4 ]
Febbo, Phillip G. [4 ]
Cooperberg, Matthew R. [1 ,5 ]
Carroll, Peter R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Urol, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Urol, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Radiol, San Francisco, CA USA
[4] Genom Hlth Inc, Redwood City, CA USA
[5] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
来源
PLOS ONE | 2017年 / 12卷 / 10期
关键词
ULTRASOUND-GUIDED BIOPSY; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE; OUTCOMES; AGGRESSIVENESS; RECURRENCE;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0185535
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background We aimed to directly compare results from multi-parametric prostate MRI (mpMRI) and a biopsy-based 17-gene RT-PCR assay providing a Genomic Prostate Score (GPS) among individuals who were candidates for active surveillance with low and intermediate risk prostate cancer (PCa). Patients and methods We evaluated the association between GPS results (scale 0-100) and endorectal mpMRI findings in men with clinically localized PCa. MR studies were reviewed to a five-tier scale of increasing suspicion of malignancy. Mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) was calculated from a single dominant lesion. Mean rank of the GPS (0-100) among MRI strata was compared with the Kruskal-Wallis test and Dunn's multiple comparison test. Spearman's correlation was performed to examine the association between mean ADC and scaled GPS. Results Of 186 patients who received GPS testing, 100 were identified who received mpMRI. Mean GPS results differed between mpMRI categories (p = 0.001); however a broad range was observed in all mpMRI categories. Among men with biopsy Gleason pattern 3+3, mean GPS results were not significantly different among MRI groups (p = 0.179), but GPS differences were seen among MRI categories for patients with pattern 3+4 (p = 0.010). Mean ADC was weakly associated with GPS (sigma = -0.151). Stromal response (p = 0.015) and cellular organization (p = 0.045) gene group scores differed significantly by MRI findings, but no differences were seen among androgen signaling or proliferation genes. Conclusions Although a statistically significant association was observed between GPS results and MRI scores, a wide range of GPS values were observed across imaging categories suggesting that mpMRI and genomic profiling may offer non-overlapping clinical insights.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] ASSOCIATION BETWEEN A 17-GENE GENOMIC PROSTATE SCORE AND MULTI-PARAMETRIC PROSTATE MRI IN MEN WITH LOW AND INTERMEDIATE RISK PROSTATE CANCER (PCA)
    Leapman, Michael
    Westphalen, Antonio
    Ameli, Niloufar
    Lawrence, Jeffrey
    Febbo, Phillip
    Cooperberg, Matthew
    Carroll, Peter
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 193 (04): : E642 - E643
  • [2] Association between a 17-gene genomic prostate score and multiparametric prostate MRI in men with low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PCa).
    Leapman, Michael S.
    Westphalen, Antonio C.
    Ameli, Niloufar
    Lawrence, H. Jeffrey
    Febbo, Phillip G.
    Cooperberg, Matthew R.
    Carroll, Peter
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 33 (07)
  • [3] The 17-Gene Genomic Prostate Score Test as a Predictor of Outcomes in Men with Unfavorable Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer
    Cullen, Jennifer
    Kuo, Huai-Ching
    Shan, Jun
    Lu, Ruixiao
    Aboushwareb, Tamer
    Eeden, Stephen K. Van Den
    UROLOGY, 2020, 143 : 103 - 111
  • [4] The 17-gene Genomic Prostate Score assay as a predictor of biochemical recurrence in men with intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer
    Helfand, Brian T.
    Paterakos, Michael
    Wang, Chi-Hsiung
    Talaty, Pooja
    Abranid, John
    Bennett, John
    Hallid, David W.
    Lehman, Amy
    Aboushwareb, Tamer
    PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (09):
  • [5] The 17-gene Genomic Prostate Score test as a predictor of treatment selection in men with favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer
    Margolis, E.
    Lowentritt, B. H.
    Pieczonka, C. M.
    Bennett, J. P.
    Pavlova, M.
    Zambon, J. P.
    Groskopf, J.
    Uchio, E.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2024, 85 : S1461 - S1462
  • [6] The 17-gene Genomic Prostate Score® assay as a predictor of biochemical recurrence in men with intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer
    Helfand, B. T.
    Paterakos, M.
    Wang, C-H.
    Talaty, P.
    Abran, J.
    Bennett, J. P.
    Hall, D. W.
    Aboushwareb, T.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2021, 79 : S1709 - S1710
  • [7] Clinical utility of a 17-gene genomic prostate score (GPS) for treatment selection in men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer (PCa).
    Dall'Era, Marc A.
    Denes, Bela
    Lawrence, H. Jeffrey
    Tsiatis, Athanasios C.
    Rothney, Megan
    Maddala, Tara
    Febbo, Phillip G.
    Badani, Ketan
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 33 (15)
  • [8] Change in a 17-gene genomic prostate score over time in men with low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer managed with active surveillance.
    Leapman, Michael S.
    Cowan, Janet E.
    Nguyen, Hao Gia
    Cooperberg, Matthew R.
    Carroll, Peter
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 34 (02)
  • [9] A 17-gene genomic prostate score (GPS) as a predictor of biochemical (BCR) and clinical recurrence (CR) in men with surgically treated intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer (PCa).
    Klein, Eric A.
    Zhang, Nan
    Crager, Michael
    Maddala, Tara
    Febbo, Phillip G.
    Thomas, Shibu
    Gormley, Michael
    Ricci, Deborah Sokol
    Falzarano, Sara Moscovita
    Magi-Galluzzi, Cristina
    Lawrence, H. Jeffrey
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 34 (02)
  • [10] A 17-gene genomic prostate score (GPS) as a predictor of biochemical (BCR) and clinical recurrence (CR) in men with surgically treated intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer (PCa).
    Klein, Eric A.
    Brand, Timothy
    Rosner, Inger L.
    Zhang, Nan
    Crager, Michael
    Maddala, Tara
    Febbo, Phillip G.
    Thomas, Shibu
    Gormley, Michael
    Ricci, Deborah S.
    Falzarano, Sara Moscovita
    Magi-Galluzzi, Cristina
    Cullen, Jennifer
    Sesterhenn, Isabel
    Lawrence, H. Jeffrey
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 34 (15)