The Utility of Short-Interval Follow-Up for Baseline High-Risk Screening Breast MRI

被引:1
|
作者
Shergill, Ravi [1 ]
Osman, Heba [2 ]
Al-Douri, Faten [3 ]
Ramonas, Milita [4 ]
Al Duwaiki, Suad [3 ]
Alabousi, Abdullah [3 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Dept Radiol, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Ottawa, Dept Radiol, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[3] McMaster Univ, St Josephs Healthcare, Dept Radiol, 50 Charlton Ave East, Hamilton, ON L8N 4A6, Canada
[4] McMaster Univ, Juravinski Hosp, Dept Radiol, Hamilton, ON, Canada
关键词
breast MRI; high risk; screening; breast cancer; BI-RADS; BACKGROUND PARENCHYMAL ENHANCEMENT; 3; LESIONS; WOMEN; CANCER; MAMMOGRAPHY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1177/0846537119895752
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective: Patients with a high lifetime risk of developing breast cancer undergo annual screening magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) starting at age 30. A proportion of these patients are subsequently required to undergo short-interval follow-up MRI 6 months after their baseline examination. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the utility and outcome of these short-interval follow-up examinations in this population. Methods: A retrospective review was performed of 523 patients who received their baseline high-risk breast screening MRI at our institution between 2013 and 2017. The proportion of patients who received a short-interval follow-up MRI at 6 months was recorded. The findings at baseline and follow-up MRI were recorded, as well as the outcomes and results of any interventions performed. Results: Ninety-six (17.6%) patients (age range: 25-67, mean age: 41) received a short-interval follow-up MRI following their baseline screening examination. Indications for follow-up included moderate to marked background parenchymal enhancement, nonmass enhancement, and likely benign enhancing mass. Of the 92 patients, 5 (5.4%) went on to have a biopsy, with none revealing a malignant pathology. The remainder either returned to routine screening (91.3%) or received further imaging in the form of ultrasound or additional follow-up MRI (3.3%). Conclusion: Short-interval follow-up breast MRI in high-risk patients after a baseline screening study with likely benign findings is unlikely to yield clinically significant findings. This retrospective study can be considered a starting point for additional future work looking at the rate, indications, and yield of short-interval follow-up following baseline high-risk screening breast MRI studies.
引用
收藏
页码:226 / 230
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Background Parenchymal Enhancement on Baseline Screening Breast MRI: Impact on Biopsy Rate and Short-Interval Follow-Up
    Hambly, Niamh M.
    Liberman, Laura
    Dershaw, D. David
    Brennan, Sandra
    Morris, Elizabeth A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2011, 196 (01) : 218 - 224
  • [2] Short-interval follow-up in screening mammography - Reply
    Sickles, EA
    Lehman, C
    Smith-Bindman, R
    Yankaskas, BC
    Geller, BM
    Carney, PA
    Kerlikowske, K
    RADIOLOGY, 2005, 237 (01) : 371 - 373
  • [3] Breast cancer yield for screening mammographic examinations with recommendation for short-interval follow-up
    Kerlikowske, K
    Smith-Bindman, R
    Abraham, LA
    Lehman, CD
    Yankaskas, BC
    Ballard-Barbash, R
    Barlow, WE
    Voeks, JH
    Geller, BM
    Carney, PA
    Sickles, EA
    RADIOLOGY, 2005, 234 (03) : 684 - 692
  • [4] Association of Telehealth with Short-Interval Follow-Up
    Chavez, Augustine
    Pullins, Christopher
    Yennie, Julia
    Singh, Charanjit
    Kosiorek, Heidi
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN BOARD OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2022, 35 (03) : 485 - 490
  • [5] Compliance with Short-Interval Follow-up MRI after Benign Concordant MRI-guided Breast Biopsy
    Ram, Shruthi
    Regen-Tuero, Helaina
    Baird, Grayson L.
    Lourenco, Ana P.
    JOURNAL OF BREAST IMAGING, 2021, 3 (01) : 64 - 71
  • [6] Utility of short-interval follow-up mammography after a benign-concordant stereotactic breast biopsy result
    Maldonado, Sean
    Gandhi, Nishant
    Ha, Tony
    Choi, Patrick
    Khalkhali, Iraj
    Kalantari, Babak N.
    Dauphine, Christine
    BREAST, 2018, 42 : 50 - 53
  • [7] Frequency and Determinants of a Short-Interval Follow-up Recommendation After an Abnormal Screening Mammogram
    Pelletier, Eric
    Daigle, Jean-Marc
    Defay, Fannie
    Major, Diane
    Guertin, Marie-Helene
    Brisson, Jacques
    CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF RADIOLOGISTS JOURNAL-JOURNAL DE L ASSOCIATION CANADIENNE DES RADIOLOGISTES, 2016, 67 (04): : 322 - 329
  • [8] BI-RADS∼ 3 lesions at contrast-enhanced breast MRI: is an initial short-interval follow-up necessary?
    Bahrs, Sonja D.
    Baur, Astrid
    Hattermann, Valerie
    Hahn, Markus
    Vogel, Ulrich
    Claussen, Claus D.
    Siegmann-Luz, Katja C.
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2014, 55 (03) : 260 - 265
  • [9] Accuracy of short-interval follow-up mammograms by patient and radiologist characteristics
    Bowles, Erin J. Aiello
    Miglioretti, Diana L.
    Sickles, Edward A.
    Abraham, Linn
    Carney, Patricia A.
    Yankaskas, Bonnie C.
    Elmore, Joann G.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2008, 190 (05) : 1200 - 1208
  • [10] Frequency and predictive value of a mammographic recommendation for short-interval follow-up
    Yasmeen, S
    Romano, PS
    Pettinger, M
    Chlebowski, RT
    Robbins, JA
    Lane, DS
    Hendrix, SL
    JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2003, 95 (06): : 429 - 436