Normal blindness: when we Look But Fail To See br

被引:24
|
作者
Wolfe, Jeremy M. [1 ,2 ]
Kosovicheva, Anna [3 ]
Wolfe, Benjamin [3 ]
机构
[1] Brigham & Womens Hosp, 900 Commonwealth Ave, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[2] Harvard Med Sch, 25 Shattuck St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Univ Toronto Mississauga, Dept Psychol, 3359 Mississauga Rd, Mississauga, ON L5L 1C6, Canada
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
SUSTAINED INATTENTIONAL BLINDNESS; VISUAL-SEARCH; TARGET PREVALENCE; INVISIBLE GORILLA; PERCEPTION; ATTENTION; TIME; REPRESENTATION; SENSITIVITY; VIGILANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.tics.2022.06.006
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Humans routinely miss important information that is 'right in front of our eyes', from overlooking typos in a paper to failing to see a cyclist in an intersection. Recent studies on these 'Looked But Failed To See' (LBFTS) errors point to a common mechanism underlying these failures, whether the missed item was an unexpected gorilla, the clearly defined target of a visual search, or that simple typo. We argue that normal blindness is the by-product of the limited-capacity prediction engine that is our visual system. The processes that evolved to allow us to move through the world with ease are virtually guaranteed to cause us to miss some significant stimuli, especially in important tasks like driving and medical image perception.
引用
收藏
页码:809 / 819
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条