Comparison of Statistical and Dynamic Downscaling Techniques in Generating High-Resolution Temperatures in China from CMIP5 GCMs

被引:45
|
作者
Zhang, Lei [1 ]
Xu, Yinlong [1 ]
Meng, Chunchun [1 ]
Li, Xinhua [1 ]
Liu, Huan [1 ]
Wang, Changgui [2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Agr Sci, Inst Environm & Sustainable Dev Agr, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Met Off Hadley Ctr, Exeter, Devon, England
关键词
Temperature; Model evaluation; performance; Model output statistics; REGIONAL CLIMATE MODEL; EXTREME PRECIPITATION INDEXES; BIAS CORRECTION; POPULATION EXPOSURE; PROJECTED CHANGES; ZHUJIANG RIVER; CHANGE IMPACT; BASIN; HEAT; UNCERTAINTIES;
D O I
10.1175/JAMC-D-19-0048.1
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
In aiming for better access to climate change information and for providing climate service, it is important to obtain reliable high-resolution temperature simulations. Systematic comparisons are still deficient between statistical and dynamic downscaling techniques because of their inherent unavoidable uncertainties. In this paper, 20 global climate models (GCMs) and one regional climate model [Providing Regional Climates to Impact Studies (PRECIS)] are employed to evaluate their capabilities in reproducing average trends of mean temperature (Tm), maximum temperature (Tmax), minimum temperature (Tmin), diurnal temperature range (DTR), and extreme events represented by frost days (FD) and heat-wave days (HD) across China. It is shown generally that bias of temperatures from GCMs relative to observations is over +/- 1 degrees C across more than one-half of mainland China. PRECIS demonstrates better representation of temperatures (except for HD) relative to GCMs. There is relatively better performance in Huanghuai, Jianghuai, Jianghan, south Yangzi River, and South China, whereas estimation is not as good in Xinjiang, the eastern part of northwest China, and the Tibetan Plateau. Bias-correction spatial disaggregation is used to downscale GCMs outputs, and bias correction is applied for PRECIS outputs, which demonstrate better improvement to a bias within +/- 0.2 degrees C for Tm, Tmax, Tmin, and DTR and +/- 2 days for FD and HD. Furthermore, such improvement is also verified by the evidence of increased spatial correlation coefficient and symmetrical uncertainty, decreased root-mean-square error, and lower standard deviation for reproductions. It is seen from comprehensive ranking metrics that different downscaled models show the most improvement across different climatic regions, implying that optional ensembles of models should be adopted to provide sufficient high-quality climate information.
引用
收藏
页码:207 / 235
页数:29
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of empirical statistical methods for downscaling daily climate projections from CMIP5 GCMs: a case study of the Huai River Basin, China
    Wang, L.
    Ranasinghe, R.
    Maskey, S.
    van Gelder, P. H. A. J. M.
    Vrijling, J. K.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY, 2016, 36 (01) : 145 - 164
  • [2] Comparison of dynamical and statistical rainfall downscaling of CMIP5 ensembles at a small urban catchment scale
    Akhter, Muhammad Saleem
    Shamseldin, Asaad Yahia
    Melville, Bruce William
    [J]. STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND RISK ASSESSMENT, 2019, 33 (4-6) : 989 - 1012
  • [3] Comparison of dynamical and statistical rainfall downscaling of CMIP5 ensembles at a small urban catchment scale
    Muhammad Saleem Akhter
    Asaad Yahia Shamseldin
    Bruce William Melville
    [J]. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 2019, 33 : 989 - 1012
  • [4] Regional climate projections of daily extreme temperatures in Argentina applying statistical downscaling to CMIP5 and CMIP6 models
    Balmaceda-Huarte, Rocio
    Olmo, Matias Ezequiel
    Bettolli, Maria Laura
    [J]. CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2024, 62 (06) : 4997 - 5018
  • [5] Uncertainty of global summer precipitation in the CMIP5 models: a comparison between high-resolution and low-resolution models
    Danqing Huang
    Peiwen Yan
    Jian Zhu
    Yaocun Zhang
    Xueyuan Kuang
    Jing Cheng
    [J]. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 2018, 132 : 55 - 69
  • [6] Uncertainty of global summer precipitation in the CMIP5 models: a comparison between high-resolution and low-resolution models
    Huang, Danqing
    Yan, Peiwen
    Zhu, Jian
    Zhang, Yaocun
    Kuang, Xueyuan
    Cheng, Jing
    [J]. THEORETICAL AND APPLIED CLIMATOLOGY, 2018, 132 (1-2) : 55 - 69
  • [7] High-resolution boreal winter precipitation projections over tropical America from CMIP5 models
    Palomino-Lemus, Reiner
    Cordoba-Machado, Samir
    Raquel Gamiz-Fortis, Sonia
    Castro-Diez, Yolanda
    Jesus Esteban-Parra, Maria
    [J]. CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2018, 51 (5-6) : 1773 - 1792
  • [8] High-resolution boreal winter precipitation projections over tropical America from CMIP5 models
    Reiner Palomino-Lemus
    Samir Córdoba-Machado
    Sonia Raquel Gámiz-Fortis
    Yolanda Castro-Díez
    María Jesús Esteban-Parra
    [J]. Climate Dynamics, 2018, 51 : 1773 - 1792
  • [9] High-resolution CMIP6 climate projections for Ethiopia using the gridded statistical downscaling method
    Fasil M. Rettie
    Sebastian Gayler
    Tobias K. D. Weber
    Kindie Tesfaye
    Thilo Streck
    [J]. Scientific Data, 10
  • [10] High-resolution CMIP6 climate projections for Ethiopia using the gridded statistical downscaling method
    Rettie, Fasil M.
    Gayler, Sebastian
    Weber, Tobias K. D.
    Tesfaye, Kindie
    Streck, Thilo
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC DATA, 2023, 10 (01)