Three-dimensional in vivo comparative analysis of the kinematics of normal shoulders and shoulders with massive rotator cuff tears with successful conservative treatment

被引:4
|
作者
Kim, Doosup [1 ]
Lee, Bonggun [2 ]
Yeom, Junseop [1 ]
Cha, Jaehack [1 ]
Han, Jinyoung [1 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Wonju Severance Christian Hosp, Wonju Coll Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Hanyang Univ, Dept Orthoped Surg, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Shoulder; Scapular kinematics; Three-dimensional kinematics; Fluoroscopy; Three-dimensional registration technique; Two-dimensional registration technique; Massive rotator cuff tear; MOTION; PAIN; SIZE;
D O I
10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2020.104990
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Background: This study used in vivo three-dimensional to two-dimensional image registration techniques to compare the glenohumeral kinematics of shoulders with massive rotator cuff tears that were successfully treated conservatively and those of normal shoulders. Methods: Ten patients (age, 67.4 +/- 3.63 years) with massive rotator cuff tears on one side and without contralateral tears were enrolled. We performed computed tomography and fluoroscopy on both shoulder joints and created three-dimensional bone models of the humerus and scapula using image registration techniques. We measured the humeral superoinferior translation, angle of humeral external rotation, scapular upward rotation, scapular anteroposterior tilt, and scapular external rotation of the torn shoulders with good range of motion after effective conservative treatment and compared these measurements to those of the contralateral normal shoulders. Findings: There was a significant difference in the initial position of the humeral head relative to the glenoid in the tear group; it was 2.0 mm higher than that in the normal group (p < .05). This difference disappeared in the range from 40 degrees to full elevation. The scapular motion of the tear group was significantly more upwardly rotated than that of the normal group: by 9.9 degrees at rest (p < .05) and by 11.6 degrees at terminal elevation (p < .05). No significant differences were detected for humeral head external rotation, scapular anteroposterior tilt, and scapular external rotation between the two groups. Interpretation: Kinematics of shoulders with massive cuff tears could not be recovered completely even though the patients had no significant symptoms after successful conservative treatment.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Three-dimensional ultrasonography of shoulders with rotator cuff tears
    Kijima, Hiroaki
    Minagawa, Hiroshi
    Yamamoto, Nobuyuki
    Tomioka, Tatsuru
    Abe, Hidekazu
    Kikuchi, Kazuma
    Shimada, Yoichi
    Okada, Kyoji
    Abe, Hiroshi
    Itoi, Eiji
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SCIENCE, 2008, 13 (06) : 510 - 513
  • [2] In vivo 3-dimensional analysis of scapular and glenohumeral kinematics: comparison of symptomatic or asymptomatic shoulders with rotator cuff tears and healthy shoulders
    Kijima, Takehiro
    Matsuki, Keisuke
    Ochiai, Nobuyasu
    Yamaguchi, Takeshi
    Sasaki, Yu
    Hashimoto, Eiko
    Sasaki, Yasuhito
    Yamazaki, Hironori
    Kenmoku, Tomonori
    Yamaguchi, Satoshi
    Masuda, Yoshitada
    Umekita, Hideo
    Banks, Scott A.
    Takahashi, Kazuhisa
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2015, 24 (11) : 1817 - 1826
  • [3] Dynamic kinematics of the glenohumeral joint in shoulders with rotator cuff tears
    Kozono, Naoya
    Okada, Takamitsu
    Takeuchi, Naohide
    Hamai, Satoshi
    Higaki, Hidehiko
    Shimoto, Takeshi
    Ikebe, Satoru
    Gondo, Hirotaka
    Nakanishi, Yoshitaka
    Senju, Takahiro
    Nakashima, Yasuharu
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2018, 13
  • [4] Dynamic kinematics of the glenohumeral joint in shoulders with rotator cuff tears
    Naoya Kozono
    Takamitsu Okada
    Naohide Takeuchi
    Satoshi Hamai
    Hidehiko Higaki
    Takeshi Shimoto
    Satoru Ikebe
    Hirotaka Gondo
    Yoshitaka Nakanishi
    Takahiro Senju
    Yasuharu Nakashima
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 13
  • [5] In vivo dynamic acromiohumeral distance in shoulders with rotator cuff tears
    Kozono, Naoya
    Okada, Takamitsu
    Takeuchi, Naohide
    Hamai, Satoshi
    Higaki, Hidehiko
    Shimoto, Takeshi
    Ikebe, Satoru
    Gondo, Hirotaka
    Nakanishi, Yoshitaka
    Senju, Takahiro
    Nakashima, Yasuharu
    CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2018, 60 : 95 - 99
  • [6] Fluoroscopic, MRI and Electrophysiologic Assessment of Shoulders with Massive Tears of the Rotator Cuff
    Wieser, Karl
    Rahm, Stefan
    Martin, Schubert
    Fischer, Michael A.
    Farshad, Mazda
    Gerber, Christian
    Meyer, Dominik C.
    SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2013, 143 : 11S - 11S
  • [7] Location and Initiation of Degenerative Rotator Cuff Tears An Analysis of Three Hundred and Sixty Shoulders
    Kim, H. Mike
    Dahiya, Nirvikar
    Teefey, Sharlene A.
    Middleton, William D.
    Stobbs, Georgia
    Steger-May, Karen
    Yamaguchi, Ken
    Keener, Jay D.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2010, 92A (05): : 1088 - 1096
  • [8] Decreasing glenoid inclination improves function in shoulders with simulated, massive rotator cuff tears
    Konrad, Gerhard G.
    Markmiller, Max
    Jolly, John T.
    Ruter, Axel E.
    Sudkarnp, Norbert P.
    McMahon, Patrick J.
    Debski, Richard E.
    CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2006, 21 (09) : 942 - 949
  • [9] Fluoroscopic, magnetic resonance imaging, and electrophysiologic assessment of shoulders with massive tears of the rotator cuff
    Wieser, Karl
    Rahm, Stefan
    Schubert, Martin
    Fischer, Michael A.
    Farshad, Mazda
    Gerber, Christian
    Meyer, Dominik C.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2015, 24 (02) : 288 - 294
  • [10] Dynamic three-dimensional shoulder kinematics in patients with massive rotator cuff tears: a comparison of patients with and without subscapularis tears
    Yamada, Yuji
    Kai, Yoshihiro
    Kida, Noriyuki
    Koda, Hitoshi
    Takeshima, Minoru
    Hoshi, Kenji
    Gamada, Kazuyoshi
    Morihara, Toru
    CLINICS IN SHOULDER AND ELBOW, 2022, 25 (04): : 265 - 273