Changes in antagonist muscles' coactivation in response to strength training in older women

被引:28
|
作者
de Boer, Maarten D. [1 ,2 ]
Morse, Christopher I. [1 ]
Thom, Jeanette M. [1 ]
de Haan, Arnold [1 ,2 ]
Narici, Marco V. [1 ]
机构
[1] Manchester Metropolitan Univ, Inst Biophys & Clin Res Human Movement IRM, Alsager ST7 2HL, England
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Inst Fundamental & Clin Human Movement Sci IFKB, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1093/gerona/62.9.1022
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Background. The purpose of this study was to assess changes in neuromuscular function of the plantarflexor and dorsiflexor muscles after I year of strength training of these muscles in elderly women. Twelve participants were assigned to a training (74.2 +/- 3.1 years) group and eight to a nontraining group (73.6 +/- 4.3 years). Methods. Isometric maximum voluntary contractions (MVC) and muscle activation based on surface electromyography (EMG) were recorded before and after the 12-month training program at six different joint angles. Results. After training (in the training group), (a) plantarflexion (PF) MVC increased on average by 14.4% (p <.05) across ankle joint angles from -20 degrees dorsiflexion (DF) to +30 degrees PF, (b) DF MVC decreased by 5.7% (p <.05), (c) PF EMG root mean square increased on average by 22.3% (p <.05), and (d) PF antagonists' coactivation increased on average by 7.5% across the tested joint angles. No changes were observed in the nontraining group. Conclusions. The present results show a significant increase in antagonist muscle coactivation with strength training in older women. The hypothesis is put forward that with a training-induced gain in agonist muscles' torque, stabilization of the ankle joint by increasing antagonist coactivation is needed because of a changed ratio of maximal PF torque to maximal DF torque.
引用
收藏
页码:1022 / 1027
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Elderly women have blunted response to resistance training despite reduced antagonist coactivation
    Laroche, Dain P.
    Roy, Steven J.
    Knight, Christopher A.
    Dickie, Jennifer L.
    [J]. MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2008, 40 (09): : 1660 - 1668
  • [2] Strength and muscle coactivation in older adults after lower limb strength training
    Kuruganti, Usha
    Parker, Philip
    Rickards, Jeremy
    Tingley, Maureen
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ERGONOMICS, 2006, 36 (09) : 761 - 766
  • [3] ANTICIPATORY AND REFLEX COACTIVATION OF ANTAGONIST MUSCLES IN CATCHING
    LACQUANITI, F
    MAIOLI, C
    [J]. BRAIN RESEARCH, 1987, 406 (1-2) : 373 - 378
  • [4] Antagonist coactivation of trunk stabilizer muscles during Pilates exercises
    Rossi, Denise Martineli
    Morcelli, Mary Hellen
    Marques, Nise Ribeiro
    Hallal, Camilla Zamfolini
    Goncalves, Mauro
    LaRoche, Dain P.
    Navega, Marcelo Tavella
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES, 2014, 18 (01) : 34 - 41
  • [6] Evaluation of isometric antagonist coactivation strategies of electrically stimulated muscles
    Zhou, BH
    Baratta, RV
    Solomonow, M
    Olivier, LJ
    Nguyen, GT
    DAmbrosia, RD
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 1996, 43 (02) : 150 - 160
  • [7] Changes in Phase Angle and Handgrip Strength Induced by Suspension Training in Older Women
    Campa, Francesco
    Silva, Analiza Monica
    Toselli, Stefania
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2018, 39 (06) : 442 - 449
  • [8] Strength training in old age: Adaptation of antagonist muscles at the ankle joint
    Simoneau, E
    Martin, A
    Porter, MM
    Van Hoecke, J
    [J]. MUSCLE & NERVE, 2006, 33 (04) : 546 - 555
  • [9] CONDITIONS UNDER WHICH OPTIMIZATION MODELS WILL NOT PREDICT COACTIVATION OF ANTAGONIST MUSCLES
    HUGHES, RE
    CHAFFIN, DB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1988, 21 (10) : 862 - 862
  • [10] Coactivation of the elbow antagonist muscles is not affected by the speed of movement in isokinetic exercise
    Bazzucchi, I
    Sbriccoli, P
    Marzattinocci, G
    Felici, F
    [J]. MUSCLE & NERVE, 2006, 33 (02) : 191 - 199