Effective forest-based climate change mitigation requires our best science COMMENT

被引:6
|
作者
Anderson-Teixeira, Kristina J. [1 ,2 ]
Belair, Ethan P. [3 ]
机构
[1] Smithsonian Conservat Biol Inst, Conservat Ecol Ctr, Front Royal, VA USA
[2] Smithsonian Trop Res Inst, Forest Global Earth Observ, Panama City, Panama
[3] Univ New Hampshire, Dept Nat Resources & Environm, Durham, NH 03824 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/gcb.16008
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
California's Cap-and-Trade Program sets a limit on the major sources of greenhouse gas emissions and allows a portion of excess emissions to be offset through purchase of credits for climate benefits accrued elsewhere. Badgley et al. (2021, Global Change Biology, ) describe how the use of mean forest carbon stocks from ecological supersections can create perverse incentives for project developers, potentially leading to over-crediting and nonadditional offsets. Carbon markets remain a valuable tool in combating climate change, but ensuring projects' additionality is of critical importance to effective carbon mitigation. Badgley's article should serve as a call to action to redouble efforts at integrating the latest carbon science into effective and timely policy solutions.
引用
收藏
页码:1200 / 1203
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Compensating for opportunity costs in forest-based global climate change mitigation
    Grainger, A
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1997, 27 : S163 - S176
  • [2] Extent and costs of forest-based climate change mitigation in Germany: accounting for substitution
    Boesch, Matthias
    Elsasser, Peter
    Rock, Joachim
    Weimar, Holger
    Dieter, Matthias
    CARBON MANAGEMENT, 2019, 10 (02) : 127 - 134
  • [3] Incorrect data sustain the claim of forest-based bioenergy being more effective in climate change mitigation than forest conservation
    Welle, Torsten
    Ibisch, Pierre L.
    Blumroeder, Jeanette S.
    Bohr, Yvonne E. -M. B.
    Leinen, Loretta
    Wohlleben, Tobias
    Sturm, Knut
    GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY, 2021, 13 (02): : 286 - 287
  • [4] When intentions do not matter: Climate change mitigation and adaptation innovations in the Forest-based sector
    Slavec, Ana
    Hoeben, Annechien D.
    Moreno-Torres, Miguel
    Primozic, Lea
    Stern, Tobias
    FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2023, 157
  • [5] Changes in perspective needed to forge 'no-regret' forest-based climate change mitigation strategies
    Erb, Karl-Heinz
    Haberl, Helmut
    Le Noe, Julia
    Tappeiner, Ulrike
    Tasser, Erich
    Gingrich, Simone
    GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY, 2022, 14 (03): : 246 - 257
  • [6] Perceptions of climate change forest-based risk to forest ecosystems and communities
    Williamson, TB
    Parkins, JR
    McFarlane, BL
    FORESTRY CHRONICLE, 2005, 81 (05): : 710 - 716
  • [7] Pathways to a forest-based bioeconomy in 2060 within policy targets on climate change mitigation and biodiversity protection
    Luhas, Jukka
    Mikkila, Mirja
    Kylkilahti, Eliisa
    Miettinen, Jenni
    Malkamaki, Arttu
    Patari, Satu
    Korhonen, Jaana
    Pekkanen, Tiia-Lotta
    Tuppura, Anni
    Lahtinen, Katja
    Autio, Minna
    Linnanen, Lassi
    Ollikainen, Markku
    Toppinen, Anne
    FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2021, 131
  • [8] Do wood products protect the climate? Public perception of the forest-based sector's contribution to climate change mitigation
    Ranacher, L.
    Stern, T.
    Schwarzbauer, P.
    AUSTRIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST SCIENCE, 2017, 134 (03): : 281 - 298
  • [9] Climate Change Mitigation through Forest-based Carbon Sequestration Projects in China: Potential Benefits and Challenges
    Liu, En
    Liu, Shirong
    ADVANCES IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, PTS 1-6, 2011, 255-260 : 2949 - 2952
  • [10] The policy and ecology of forest-based climate mitigation: challenges, needs, and opportunities
    Courtney L. Giebink
    Grant M. Domke
    Rosie A. Fisher
    Kelly A. Heilman
    David J. P. Moore
    R. Justin DeRose
    Margaret E. K. Evans
    Plant and Soil, 2022, 479 : 25 - 52