Timing luteal support in assisted reproductive technology: a systematic review

被引:34
|
作者
Connell, Matthew T. [1 ]
Szatkowski, Jennifer M. [1 ]
Terry, Nancy [2 ]
DeCherney, Alan H. [1 ]
Propst, Anthony M. [3 ]
Hill, Micah J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Eunice Kennedy Shriver Natl Inst Child Hlth & Hum, Program Reprod & Adult Endocrinol, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[2] Natl Inst Hlth Lib, Bethesda, MD USA
[3] Texas Fertil Ctr, Austin, TX USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Progesterone; luteal support; in vitro fertilization; IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; GONADOTROPIN-RELEASING-HORMONE; RECOMBINANT LUTEINIZING-HORMONE; CIRCULATING PROGESTERONE LEVELS; FOLLICLE-STIMULATING-HORMONE; HUMAN CHORIONIC-GONADOTROPIN; FINAL OOCYTE MATURATION; CRINONE 8-PERCENT GEL; LIVE BIRTH-RATES; PHASE SUPPORT;
D O I
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.12.125
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To summarize the available published randomized controlled trial data regarding timing of P supplementation during the luteal phase of patients undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART). Design: A systematic review. Setting: Not applicable. Patient(s): Undergoing IVF. Intervention(s): Different starting times of P for luteal support. Main Outcome Measure(s): Clinical pregnancy (PR) and live birth rates. Result(s): Five randomized controlled trials were identified that met inclusion criteria with a total of 872 patients. A planned meta-analysis was not performed because of a high degree of clinical heterogeneity with regard to the timing, dose, and route of P. Two studies compared P initiated before oocyte retrieval versus the day of oocyte retrieval and PRs were 5%-12% higher when starting P on the day of oocyte retrieval. One study compared starting P on day 6 after retrieval versus day 3, reporting a 16% decrease in pregnancy in the day 6 group. Trials comparing P start times on the day of oocyte retrieval versus 2 or 3 days after retrieval showed no significant differences in pregnancy. Conclusion(s): There appears to be a window for P start time between the evening of oocyte retrieval and day 3 after oocyte retrieval. Although some studies have suggested a potential benefit in delaying vaginal P start time to 2 days after oocyte retrieval, this review could not find randomized controlled trials to adequately assess this. Further randomized clinical trials are needed to better define P start time for luteal support after ART. (C) 2015 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:939 / U112
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Luteal phase support in assisted reproductive technology
    Pabuccu, R
    Akar, ME
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 17 (03) : 277 - 281
  • [2] Luteal phase support in assisted reproductive technology
    Garg, Akanksha
    Zielinska, Agata P.
    Yeung, Arthur C.
    Abdelmalak, Rebecca
    Chen, Runzhi
    Hossain, Aleena
    Israni, Alisha
    Nelson, Scott M.
    Babwah, Andy V.
    Dhillo, Waljit S.
    Abbara, Ali
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2024, 20 (03) : 149 - 167
  • [3] Systematic review of the clinical efficacy of vaginal progesterone for luteal phase support in assisted reproductive technology cycles
    Child, Tim
    Leonard, Saoirse A.
    Evans, Jennifer S.
    Lass, Amir
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2018, 36 (06) : 630 - 645
  • [4] Systematic review of the clinical efficacy of vaginal progesterone for luteal phase support in assisted reproductive technology cycles
    Child, T.
    Leonard, S.
    Evans, J. S.
    Lass, A.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2017, 32 : 490 - 490
  • [5] What is the optimal luteal support in assisted reproductive technology?
    Wang, Nathalie F.
    Bungum, Leif
    Skouby, Sven O.
    [J]. HORMONE MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, 2022, 43 (02) : 225 - 233
  • [6] The efficacy of luteal phase support in women with polycystic ovary syndrome following assisted reproductive technology: a systematic review
    Harzif, Achmad Kemal
    Pratamasari, Sarah Miriam Ratna
    Rumapea, Costan Tryono Parulian
    Ummah, Nafi'atul
    Mutia, Heidi Dewi
    Nurbaeti, Putri
    Puspawardani, Aisyah Retno
    Wiweko, Budi
    [J]. MIDDLE EAST FERTILITY SOCIETY JOURNAL, 2024, 29 (01)
  • [7] Vaginal versus intramuscular progesterone for luteal phase support in assisted reproductive technology: A systematic review with meta-analysis.
    Olivier, FL
    Sanchez-Ramos, L
    Kaunitz, A
    Fox, MD
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2003, 80 : S66 - S67
  • [8] Systematic Review of the Clinical Efficacy of Vaginal Progesterone for Luteal Phase Support in Assisted Reproductive Technology Cycles EDITORIAL COMMENT
    Child, Tim
    Leonard, Saoirse A.
    Evans, Jennifer S.
    Lass, Amir
    [J]. OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2018, 73 (10) : 581 - 581
  • [9] Luteal phase support in assisted reproductive technology centers: Italian survey
    la Marca, Antonio
    Anserini, Paola
    Borini, Andrea
    D'amato, Giuseppe
    Greco, Ermanno
    Livi, Claudia
    Papaleo, Enrico
    Rago, Rocco
    [J]. MINERVA OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2024, 76 (02) : 109 - 117
  • [10] Luteal-phase support in assisted reproductive technology: An ongoing challenge
    Dashti, Saeideh
    Eftekhar, Maryam
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE, 2021, 19 (09) : 761 - 772