Cross compliance as instrument for agri-environmental policy

被引:0
|
作者
Nitsch, H [1 ]
Osterburg, B [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Landliche Raume Bundesforsch Landwirtschaft, FAL, D-38116 Braunschweig, Germany
来源
LANDBAUFORSCHUNG VOLKENRODE | 2004年 / 54卷 / 03期
关键词
cross-compliance; sanctions; environmental standards;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Cross-compliance means to make the reception of public support payments contingent upon compliance with environmental and other requirements. After having introduced first options for cross-compliance in the "Agenda 2000", the EU prescribes more than ever the framework for definition and control of standards with the planned compulsory introduction of cross-compliance, based on the reforms of June 2003. The requirements include compliance with certain directives and regulations concerning environment, animal welfare and public, animal and plant health and with standards for soil conservation, maintenance of land and protection of landscape features and permanent pasture. Compliance with the relevant mandatory standards is reinforced by more systematic controls and reductions of premia, these sanctions not only depending on the severity of a breach but as well on the height of the direct payments. Farms are affected by possible sanctions on the basis of cross-compliance to a different extent. As to be able to target relevant environmental problems, risk-analysis for selection of farms to be controlled is inevitable. Sanctions have to take into account to a great extent the actual environmental impacts, especially if indirect indicators are used for control. Standards that go beyond legislation might compete with requirements for agri-environmental measures, which can be an incentive to define low standards, thus not using the regulatory opportunities of cross-compliance. Further on, cross-compliance still doesn't ensure sufficient protection of permanent pasture. The higher control rates of 5% in connection with the control of "good farming practice" as a condition for support payments can create problems of acceptance of voluntary measures as the affected farms run a higher risk of being sanctioned through cross-compliance, as well. Besides rising control frequency and sanctions, the use of co-operative elements, such as technical assistance and audits, for the implementation of environmental standards should be promoted.
引用
收藏
页码:171 / 185
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Compliance monitoring and agri-environmental policy
    Choe, C
    Fraser, I
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1999, 50 (03) : 468 - 487
  • [2] Agri-environmental law and policy
    Hodge, I
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2000, 44 (03) : 497 - 500
  • [3] OPTIONS FOR AGRI-ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY
    HUGHES, GO
    RUSSELL, NP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1994, 45 (01) : 163 - 165
  • [4] Moral hazard, risk aversion and compliance monitoring in agri-environmental policy
    Ozanne, A
    Hogan, T
    Colman, D
    [J]. EUROPEAN REVIEW OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2001, 28 (03) : 329 - 347
  • [5] Agri-Environmental Program Compliance in a Heterogeneous Landscape
    Lankoski, Jussi
    Lichtenberg, Erik
    Ollikainen, Markku
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2010, 47 (01): : 1 - 22
  • [6] Heterogeneity in compliance costs of agri-environmental measures
    Huber, Robert
    Flury, Christian
    [J]. AGRARFORSCHUNG SCHWEIZ, 2017, 8 (01): : 12 - 17
  • [7] Use of Compliance Rewards in Agri-environmental Schemes
    Yano, Yuki
    Blandford, David
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 60 (03) : 530 - 545
  • [8] Agri-Environmental Program Compliance in a Heterogeneous Landscape
    Jussi Lankoski
    Erik Lichtenberg
    Markku Ollikainen
    [J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2010, 47 : 1 - 22
  • [9] Decentralisation of agri-environmental policy design
    Bareille, Francois
    Zavalloni, Matteo
    [J]. EUROPEAN REVIEW OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2020, 47 (04) : 1502 - 1530
  • [10] Agri-environmental policy in the European Union
    Ilbery, B
    [J]. GEOGRAPHY, 2001, 86 : 95 - 95